Suppr超能文献

患有心血管疾病或疾病风险高的人群比健康同龄人久坐不动的时间更长,活动更少。

Subjects with cardiovascular disease or high disease risk are more sedentary and less active than their healthy peers.

作者信息

Vasankari Ville, Husu Pauliina, Vähä-Ypyä Henri, Suni Jaana Helena, Tokola Kari, Borodulin Katja, Wennman Heini, Halonen Jari, Hartikainen Juha, Sievänen Harri, Vasankari Tommi

机构信息

The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.

Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH), Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 May 2;4(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000363. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We investigated differences in objectively measured sedentary behaviour (SB) and physical activity (PA) levels in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) diagnosis or high CVD risk compared with healthy controls.

METHODS

The present study includes a subsample (n=1398, Health 2011 Study) of participants, who attended health examinations and wore a triaxial accelerometer (≥4 days). Patients with CVD were identified and CVD risk was calculated for others using Framingham Risk Score (FRS). Participants were categorised into groups: FRS<10%; FRS=10%-30%; FRS>30%/CVD. Raw acceleration data were analysed with mean amplitude deviation (MAD) and angle for posture estimation (APE). MAD corresponding to intensity of PA was converted to metabolic equivalents (MET) and categorised to light (1.5-2.9 METs) and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA≥3.0 METs). APE recognises SB and standing.

RESULTS

Daily accumulated time of >30 s MVPA bouts was higher in FRS<10% group (46 min) than in FRS>30%/CVD group (29 min) (p<0.001). FRS>30%/CVD group were more sedentary, their mean daily number of >10 min SB bouts (13.2) was higher than in FRS <10% group (11.5) (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Number and accumulated times of SB and PA bouts differed between the CVD risk groups. Causative research is required to assess the importance of SB and PA in prevention and rehabilitation of CVDs.

摘要

目的

我们调查了患有心血管疾病(CVD)或心血管疾病高风险的受试者与健康对照者在客观测量的久坐行为(SB)和身体活动(PA)水平上的差异。

方法

本研究纳入了一个子样本(n = 1398,2011年健康研究),这些参与者参加了健康检查并佩戴了三轴加速度计(≥4天)。确定患有CVD的患者,并使用弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)计算其他人的心血管疾病风险。参与者被分为以下几组:FRS<10%;FRS = 10% - 30%;FRS>30%/CVD。原始加速度数据采用平均幅度偏差(MAD)和姿势估计角度(APE)进行分析。将与身体活动强度相对应的MAD转换为代谢当量(MET),并分为轻度(1.5 - 2.9 METs)和中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA≥3.0 METs)。APE可识别久坐行为和站立状态。

结果

FRS<10%组中,每日累计超过30秒的MVPA发作时间(46分钟)高于FRS>30%/CVD组(29分钟)(p<0.001)。FRS>30%/CVD组久坐时间更长,他们每天超过10分钟的久坐发作平均次数(13.2次)高于FRS<10%组(11.5次)(p = 0.002)。

结论

心血管疾病风险组之间的久坐行为和身体活动发作次数及累计时间存在差异。需要进行因果关系研究以评估久坐行为和身体活动在心血管疾病预防和康复中的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0266/5950643/7f936848feff/bmjsem-2018-000363f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验