• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试确定阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度时手动分析与自动分析的差异。

Differences between manual and automatic analysis in determining the severity of obstructive sleep apnea using home sleep apnea testing.

机构信息

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Sebastián, Concepción, Chile; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Complejo Asistencial Dr. Víctor Ríos Ruiz, Los Ángeles, Chile; Evidence Based Medicine in Pulmonology (EBMIP) Working Group, Los Angeles, Chile.

Centro de Pacientes Críticos, Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile; Grupo de estudio trastornos respiratorios del sueño (GETRS), Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Sleep Med. 2018 Jul;47:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2018.03.015
PMID:29772418
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) is a diagnostic measure for obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) in moderate/high risk patients. Some HSAT companies contain automatic analysis (AA). However, guidelines recommend manual analysis (MA) despite the weak evidence for this recommendation.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the concordance between AA and MA of HSAT to make either a diagnosis and severity classification.

METHODS

We evaluated AA and MA of HSAT between 2015 and 2016. The study was a blind analysis reviewed by two physicians using currents recommendations. The differences between AA and MA were compared with single variable T analysis, inter-scorer agreement for diagnosis was evaluated with Cohen Kappa coefficient, correlation was examined using Tau-b Kendall, and Bland-Altman plot was constructed to analyze differences between AA and MA.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-eight patients were included. In our study, the mean age was 50 ± 15 years, 83% male, BMI 30 ± 5 and neck circumference 41 ± 4 cm. Eighty-two percent of subjects showed an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 5 ev/h. Thirty-five percent of patients with OSAHS were mild (AHI: 5-15 ev/h), 34% moderate and 31% severe (>30 ev/h). The kappa coefficient between physicians was 1.0 (high), between AA and MA was 0.58 (moderate) for the diagnosis of OSAHS and 0.33 (weak) for severity with 0.70 Tau-b. The AA underestimates the IAH -8 ev/h, (95% CI -9 to -7 ev/h, p < 0.001) and delivers a misclassification of severity by 47%.

CONCLUSIONS

AA underestimates the rate of respiratory events and alters the classification of the severity of the disease and may modify the therapeutic approach.

摘要

介绍

家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试(HSAT)是中/高危患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)的诊断方法。一些 HSAT 公司包含自动分析(AA)。然而,尽管对这一建议的证据较弱,但指南仍推荐手动分析(MA)。

目的

评估 HSAT 的 AA 与 MA 的一致性,以做出诊断和严重程度分类。

方法

我们评估了 2015 年至 2016 年期间的 HSAT 的 AA 和 MA。该研究是一项盲法分析,由两名医生使用当前建议进行审查。使用单变量 T 分析比较 AA 和 MA 之间的差异,使用 Cohen Kappa 系数评估诊断的评分者间一致性,使用 Tau-b Kendall 检验评估相关性,并用 Bland-Altman 图分析 AA 和 MA 之间的差异。

结果

共纳入 198 例患者。在我们的研究中,平均年龄为 50±15 岁,83%为男性,BMI 为 30±5,颈围为 41±4cm。82%的受试者出现呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)>5 次/小时。35%的 OSAHS 患者为轻度(AHI:5-15 次/小时),34%为中度,31%为重度(>30 次/小时)。两位医生之间的 Kappa 系数为 1.0(高),AA 与 MA 之间的 Kappa 系数为 0.58(中度),用于 OSAHS 的诊断,0.33(弱)用于严重程度,Tau-b 为 0.70。AA 低估了呼吸暂停低通气指数(IAH)-8 次/小时(95%置信区间为-9 至-7 次/小时,p<0.001),并导致严重程度的分类错误 47%。

结论

AA 低估了呼吸事件的发生率,并改变了疾病严重程度的分类,可能会改变治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Differences between manual and automatic analysis in determining the severity of obstructive sleep apnea using home sleep apnea testing.使用家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试确定阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度时手动分析与自动分析的差异。
Sleep Med. 2018 Jul;47:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
2
Home Sleep Apnea Testing is a Feasible and Accurate Method to Diagnose Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Stroke Patients During In-Hospital Rehabilitation.家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试是一种在住院康复期间诊断中风患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的可行且准确的方法。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Sep 15;14(9):1495-1501. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7322.
3
Validation of the Nox-T3 Portable Monitor for Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Chinese Adults.诺克斯-T3便携式监测仪用于中国成年人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断的验证
J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 May 15;13(5):675-683. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6582.
4
Is the Nox-T3 device scoring algorithm accurate enough for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea?Nox-T3 设备评分算法对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的诊断足够准确吗?
Adv Respir Med. 2021;89(3):262-267. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2021.0053.
5
Reliability and validity testing of automated scoring in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis with the Embletta X100.采用 Embletta X100 对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停进行自动评分的可靠性和有效性测试。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Feb;125(2):493-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.24878. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
6
Validation of the Nox-T3 Portable Monitor for Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.用于诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的Nox-T3便携式监测仪的验证
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Apr 15;15(4):587-596. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7720.
7
Misclassification of OSA severity with automated scoring of home sleep recordings.家庭睡眠记录自动评分对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度的错误分类。
Chest. 2015 Mar;147(3):719-727. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0929.
8
Performance comparison of peripheral arterial tonometry-based testing and polysomnography to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea in military personnel.基于外周动脉张力测定的检测与多导睡眠图在军事人员中诊断阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的性能比较。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Jun 1;18(6):1523-1530. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9894.
9
Utility of home sleep apnea testing in high-risk veterans.家庭睡眠呼吸暂停检测在高危退伍军人中的效用。
Sleep Breath. 2017 Sep;21(3):647-655. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1467-8. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
[Utility of the type 3 portable monitor for the diagnosis of patients with obstructive sleep apnea].[3型便携式监测仪在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者诊断中的应用]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 15;99(38):2994-2999. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.38.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of automatic polygraphy analysis versus manual analysis in obstructive sleep apnea.自动多导睡眠图分析与手动分析在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断准确性方面的评估。
Sleep Breath. 2025 Jun 20;29(4):218. doi: 10.1007/s11325-025-03374-4.
2
Two-stage screening for obstructive sleep apnea in the primary practice setting.初级医疗机构中阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的两阶段筛查。
Sleep Breath. 2024 Dec;28(6):2531-2538. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03142-w. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
3
Clinical Application of the Multicomponent Grading System for Sleep Apnea Classification and Incident Cardiovascular Mortality.
睡眠呼吸暂停分类及心血管事件死亡率多组分分级系统的临床应用
Sleep Sci. 2023 Nov 22;16(4):e446-e453. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776770. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Is the time below 90% of SpO during sleep (T90%) a metric of good health? A longitudinal analysis of two cohorts.睡眠时间内 SpO2 低于 90%的时间(T90%)是否是健康的指标?两个队列的纵向分析。
Sleep Breath. 2024 Mar;28(1):281-289. doi: 10.1007/s11325-023-02909-x. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
5
Brazilian Thoracic Association Consensus on Sleep-disordered Breathing.巴西胸科协会睡眠呼吸障碍共识。
J Bras Pneumol. 2022 Jul 8;48(4):e20220106. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20220106. eCollection 2022.
6
Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in COVID-19 Survivors, Symptoms Changes Between 4-Months and 1 Year After the COVID-19 Infection.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)对新冠病毒病康复者的影响:新冠病毒感染后4个月至1年期间的症状变化
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 14;9:884218. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.884218. eCollection 2022.