• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球三分之一的受保护土地承受着巨大的人类压力。

One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure.

机构信息

School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.

Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):788-791. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9565.

DOI:10.1126/science.aap9565
PMID:29773750
Abstract

In an era of massive biodiversity loss, the greatest conservation success story has been the growth of protected land globally. Protected areas are the primary defense against biodiversity loss, but extensive human activity within their boundaries can undermine this. Using the most comprehensive global map of human pressure, we show that 6 million square kilometers (32.8%) of protected land is under intense human pressure. For protected areas designated before the Convention on Biological Diversity was ratified in 1992, 55% have since experienced human pressure increases. These increases were lowest in large, strict protected areas, showing that they are potentially effective, at least in some nations. Transparent reporting on human pressure within protected areas is now critical, as are global targets aimed at efforts required to halt biodiversity loss.

摘要

在生物多样性大量丧失的时代,保护地的全球增长成为了最伟大的保护成功案例。保护地是防止生物多样性丧失的主要防线,但人类在其边界内的广泛活动可能会破坏这一点。利用最全面的全球人类压力图,我们表明,有 600 万平方公里(32.8%)的保护地受到强烈的人类压力。对于在 1992 年《生物多样性公约》批准之前指定的保护区,自那时以来,有 55%的保护区经历了人类压力的增加。在大型、严格的保护区中,这种增加幅度最低,这表明它们至少在某些国家是有效的。现在,保护区内人类压力的透明报告至关重要,而旨在努力制止生物多样性丧失的全球目标也是如此。

相似文献

1
One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure.全球三分之一的受保护土地承受着巨大的人类压力。
Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):788-791. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9565.
2
Mapping change in human pressure globally on land and within protected areas.绘制全球陆地及保护区内人类压力的变化情况。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Dec;28(6):1604-16. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12332. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
3
Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism.全球保护区的扩张受到预计土地利用和地方主义的影响。
Nature. 2014 Dec 18;516(7531):383-6. doi: 10.1038/nature14032. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
4
More than two-fifths of the protected land in a global biodiversity hotspot in southwest China is under intense human pressure.中国西南部一个全球生物多样性热点地区超过五分之二的保护地面临着巨大的人类压力。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 1;906:167283. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167283. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Philippine protected areas are not meeting the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness requirements of Aichi Target 11.菲律宾的保护区未能达到爱知目标11的生物多样性覆盖范围和管理有效性要求。
Ambio. 2016 Apr;45(3):313-22. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0740-y. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
6
A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status.全球无道路区域及其保护状况地图。
Science. 2016 Dec 16;354(6318):1423-1427. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7166.
7
The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity.需要保护以维护生物多样性的最小陆地面积。
Science. 2022 Jun 3;376(6597):1094-1101. doi: 10.1126/science.abl9127. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
8
Assessing national human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation in Iran.评估伊朗的国家人类足迹及其对生物多样性保护的影响。
Ambio. 2020 Sep;49(9):1506-1518. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01305-8. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
9
Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets.衡量保护区的范围和有效性,以此作为实现全球生物多样性目标的一项指标。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):443-55. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1592.
10
Results of efforts by the Convention on Biological Diversity to describe ecologically or biologically significant marine areas.《生物多样性公约》为描述具有生态或生物重要性的海洋区域所做努力的成果。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):571-81. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12649. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of human presence and footprint on animal space use in US national parks.人类存在和足迹对美国国家公园动物空间利用的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20251013. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1013. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Global alternatives of natural vegetation cover.自然植被覆盖的全球替代物。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 16;16(1):6484. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61520-8.
3
Global scale assessment of the human-induced extinction crisis of terrestrial carnivores.全球范围内对人为导致的陆地食肉动物灭绝危机的评估。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jul 18;11(29):eadq2853. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adq2853. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
4
Evaluating conservation gaps of China's national key protected wild plants: insights from county-level distribution data.评估中国国家重点保护野生植物的保护空缺:基于县级分布数据的见解
BMC Biol. 2025 Jun 4;23(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02270-3.
5
Integrating human mobility and animal movement data reveals complex space-use between humans and white-tailed deer in urban environments.整合人类活动与动物移动数据揭示了城市环境中人类与白尾鹿之间复杂的空间利用情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 28;15(1):18588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03577-5.
6
Cropland encroachment on global protected areas and its national-level drivers.农田对全球保护区的侵占及其国家级驱动因素。
Oecologia. 2025 May 21;207(6):87. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05727-y.
7
Mammalian Community Structure Varies With Distance Between Protected Areas in the Omo Valley, Southwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部奥莫河谷哺乳动物群落结构随保护区间距离而变化。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 23;15(4):e71248. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71248. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Global impoverishment of natural vegetation revealed by dark diversity.黑暗多样性揭示的全球自然植被匮乏状况
Nature. 2025 May;641(8064):917-924. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08814-5. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
9
The spatial and temporal evolution of habitat quality and driving factors in nature reserves: a case study of 33 forest ecosystem reserves in Guizhou Province.自然保护区栖息地质量及其驱动因素的时空演变——以贵州省33个森林生态系统保护区为例
PeerJ. 2025 Mar 24;13:e19098. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19098. eCollection 2025.
10
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Wildlife in Huangshan Scenic Area, Anhui Province, China.新冠疫情对中国安徽省黄山风景区野生动物的影响
Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;15(6):857. doi: 10.3390/ani15060857.