• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农田对全球保护区的侵占及其国家级驱动因素。

Cropland encroachment on global protected areas and its national-level drivers.

作者信息

Gao Haiyang, Zhu Di

机构信息

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, 510520, China.

National Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory for Conservation Ecology in the Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2025 May 21;207(6):87. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05727-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00442-025-05727-y
PMID:40397244
Abstract

Cropland encroachment on protected areas (PAs) impedes the achievement of global biodiversity conservation goals. However, the extent and expansion of cropland in PAs as well as regional and protection level differences on timescale, and national drivers thereof remains unassessed. We analyzed the land cover composition of global PAs to identify cropland changes from 1985 to 2020 and visualized cropland encroachment degree of PA patches by calculating cropland grid density (CGD) which is defined as the amount of cropland grids per square kilometer. We further identified nations' economic and agricultural development indicators as the primary drivers of cropland encroachment through correlation analysis and GLM method. The results indicate that cropland encroachment on PAs occurs worldwide with significant different level at both regional and protection levels. In western Europe, southern Latin America, central Africa, and southern Asia, a proportion of PA patches have high CGDs. CGDs of Asia and Pacific, Europe and Latin America, and Caribbean PA patches declined, whereas the indices increased in Africa and West Asia. CGDs of PAs with high protection levels are lower than that of PAs with low protection levels. At the national scale, economic development, agricultural development level, and cropland encroachment degree show negative correlations, whereas positively correlated with poverty stress and rural population percentage. The optimal model suggests the GDP per capita, arable land and permanent cropland percentage are significant factors influencing cropland encroachment on PAs. This study highlights the challenges to balance agricultural development and ecological protection and call for a stricter protection on PAs.

摘要

农田侵占保护区阻碍了全球生物多样性保护目标的实现。然而,保护区内农田的范围和扩张情况,以及时间尺度上的区域和保护水平差异及其国家驱动因素仍未得到评估。我们分析了全球保护区的土地覆盖组成,以确定1985年至2020年期间的农田变化情况,并通过计算农田网格密度(CGD,定义为每平方公里的农田网格数量)来直观呈现保护区斑块的农田侵占程度。我们还通过相关性分析和广义线性模型方法,确定了各国的经济和农业发展指标是农田侵占的主要驱动因素。结果表明,全球范围内都存在农田侵占保护区的现象,在区域和保护水平上都有显著的差异。在西欧、拉丁美洲南部、非洲中部和亚洲南部,一定比例的保护区斑块具有较高的CGD值。亚太地区、欧洲和拉丁美洲以及加勒比地区保护区斑块的CGD值下降,而非洲和西亚的指数上升。高保护水平保护区的CGD值低于低保护水平保护区。在国家层面,经济发展、农业发展水平与农田侵占程度呈负相关,而与贫困压力和农村人口百分比呈正相关。最优模型表明,人均国内生产总值、耕地和永久作物百分比是影响保护区农田侵占的重要因素。本研究突出了平衡农业发展与生态保护的挑战,并呼吁对保护区进行更严格的保护。

相似文献

1
Cropland encroachment on global protected areas and its national-level drivers.农田对全球保护区的侵占及其国家级驱动因素。
Oecologia. 2025 May 21;207(6):87. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05727-y.
2
Coincidence Analysis of the Cropland Distribution of Multi-Sets of Global Land Cover Products.多套全球土地覆盖产品的耕地分布巧合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;17(3):707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030707.
3
One-third of cropland within protected areas could be retired in China for inferior sustainability and effects.中国三分之一的保护区耕地可能会因可持续性和效果较差而休耕。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 20;905:167084. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167084. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
4
Dramatic cropland expansion in Myanmar following political reforms threatens biodiversity.缅甸政治改革后耕地剧增,威胁生物多样性。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 8;8(1):16558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34974-8.
5
Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security.保护区内广泛存在的耕地突出了保护与粮食安全之间的权衡取舍。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010121118.
6
Up to the mountains and down to the wetlands: Thirty years' migration of cropland in China since 1990.上山下乡:1990年以来中国耕地的三十年变迁
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123949. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123949. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
7
Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity.未来耕地扩张和集约化对农业市场和生物多样性的全球影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jun 28;10(1):2844. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10775-z.
8
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Pasture intensification is insufficient to relieve pressure on conservation priority areas in open agricultural markets.在开放的农产品市场中,加强牧场管理不足以缓解对保护优先地区的压力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3199-3213. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14272. Epub 2018 May 4.
10
Global cropland could be almost halved: Assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets.全球耕地面积可能减少近一半:不同策略下的耕地节约潜力评估及其对农业市场的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 22;17(2):e0263063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263063. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing spatial patterns and driving factors of cropland change in China's National Protected Areas for sustainable management.分析中国国家保护区农田变化的空间格局及驱动因素以实现可持续管理。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169102. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169102. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
2
Accelerated cropland expansion into high integrity forests and protected areas globally in the 21st century.21世纪全球范围内农田加速扩张至高度完整的森林和保护区。
iScience. 2023 Mar 20;26(4):106450. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106450. eCollection 2023 Apr 21.
3
Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security.
保护区内广泛存在的耕地突出了保护与粮食安全之间的权衡取舍。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010121118.
4
Built-up areas within and around protected areas: Global patterns and 40-year trends.保护区内部及周边的建成区:全球格局与40年趋势
Glob Ecol Conserv. 2020 Dec;24:e01291. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01291.
5
What is Threatening Forests in Protected Areas? A Global Assessment of Deforestation in Protected Areas, 2001-2018.保护区内的森林面临哪些威胁?2001 - 2018年保护区森林砍伐情况的全球评估
Forests. 2020;11(5):539. doi: 10.3390/f11050539.
6
Animal invaders threaten protected areas worldwide.动物入侵威胁着全世界的保护区。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 8;11(1):2892. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16719-2.
7
Cross-boundary human impacts compromise the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem.跨界人类活动影响了塞伦盖蒂-马赛马拉生态系统。
Science. 2019 Mar 29;363(6434):1424-1428. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0564. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity.生物能源耕地扩张可能会抵消气候变化缓解对全球脊椎动物多样性的积极影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 26;115(52):13294-13299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807745115. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
9
Drivers of woody plant encroachment over Africa.非洲木本植物蔓延的驱动因素。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 11;9(1):2272. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04616-8.
10
One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure.全球三分之一的受保护土地承受着巨大的人类压力。
Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):788-791. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9565.