Shah Dhvani, Driessen Maurice, Risebrough Nancy, Baker Timothy, Naya Ian, Briggs Andrew, Ismaila Afisi S
ICON Health Economics, ICON, New York, NY USA.
2Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 May 10;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0101-3. eCollection 2018.
Cost-effectiveness of once-daily umeclidinium bromide (UMEC) was compared with once-daily tiotropium (TIO) and once-daily glycopyrronium (GLY) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective.
A linked-equation model was implemented to estimate COPD progression, associated healthcare costs, exacerbations rates, life years (LY) and quality-adjusted LY (QALYs). Statistical risk equations for endpoints and resource use were derived from the ECLIPSE and TORCH studies, respectively. Treatment effects [mean (standard error)] at 12 weeks on forced expiratory volume in 1 s and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score were obtained from the intention-to-treat populations of two head-to-head studies [GSK study identifiers 201316 (NCT02207829) and 201315 (NCT02236611)] which compared UMEC 62.5 mcg with TIO 18 mcg and UMEC 62.5 mcg with GLY 50 mcg, respectively. Treatment costs reflect UK list prices (2016) and NHS unit costs; UMEC and GLY prices being equal and less than TIO. A lifetime horizon, discounted costs and effects at 3.5% were used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of variations in input parameters and assumptions in the model.
Over a lifetime horizon, UMEC was predicted to increase LYs (+ 0.195; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.069, 0.356) and QALYs (+ 0.118; 95% CI: 0.055, 0.191) and reduce the number of annual exacerbations (- 0.053; 95% CI: - 0.171, 0.028) compared with TIO, with incremental cost savings of £460/patient (95% CI: - £645, - £240). Compared with GLY, UMEC increased LYs (+ 0.124; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.281) and QALYs (+ 0.101; 95% CI: 0.043, 0.179) and reduced annual exacerbation (- 0.033; 95% CI: - 0.135, 0.017) at an additional cost of £132/patient (95% CI: £12, £330), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £1310/QALY (95% CI: £284, £2060). Similar results were observed in alternative time horizons and additional sensitivity analyses.
For treatment of patients with COPD in the UK over a lifetime horizon, treatment with UMEC dominates treatment with TIO, providing both improved health outcomes and cost savings. In comparison with GLY, treatment with UMEC achieved improved health outcomes but was associated with a higher cost. 201316, NCT02207829; 201315, NCT02236611.
从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度,比较了每日一次的乌美溴铵(UMEC)与每日一次的噻托溴铵(TIO)和每日一次的格隆溴铵(GLY)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的成本效益。
采用关联方程模型来估计COPD的进展、相关医疗费用、急性加重率、生命年(LY)和质量调整生命年(QALY)。终点和资源使用的统计风险方程分别来自ECLIPSE和TORCH研究。12周时一秒用力呼气容积和圣乔治呼吸问卷评分的治疗效果[均值(标准误)]来自两项头对头研究[葛兰素史克研究标识符201316(NCT02207829)和201315(NCT02236611)]的意向性治疗人群,这两项研究分别比较了62.5微克UMEC与18微克TIO以及62.5微克UMEC与50微克GLY。治疗成本反映英国标价(2016年)和NHS单位成本;UMEC和GLY价格相等且低于TIO。采用终身视角,成本和效果按3.5%进行贴现。进行敏感性分析以评估模型中输入参数和假设变化的稳健性。
在终身视角下,预计与TIO相比,UMEC可增加LY(+0.195;95%置信区间[CI]:0.069,0.356)和QALY(+0.118;95%CI:0.055,0.191),并减少年度急性加重次数(-0.053;95%CI:-0.171,0.028),每位患者可额外节省成本460英镑(95%CI:-645英镑,-240英镑)。与GLY相比,UMEC增加了LY(+0.124;95%CI:0.015,0.281)和QALY(+0.101;95%CI:0.043,0.179),并减少了年度急性加重(-0.033;95%CI:-0.135,0.017),但每位患者需额外花费132英镑(95%CI:12英镑,330英镑),增量成本效益比为1310英镑/QALY(95%CI:284英镑,2060英镑)。在其他时间视角和额外的敏感性分析中也观察到了类似结果。
对于英国COPD患者的终身治疗,UMEC治疗优于TIO治疗,既能改善健康结局又能节省成本。与GLY相比,UMEC治疗改善了健康结局,但成本较高。201316,NCT02207829;201315,NCT02236611。