• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高校校园突发事件应急准备干预评估

An evaluation of a college campus emergency preparedness intervention.

机构信息

Cornell University, United States.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2018 Jun;65:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.003
PMID:29776531
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Given the range of emergencies that beset postsecondary institutions, university administrators must take a multimodal approach to prepare campus stakeholders for safety threats. One such strategy is emergency preparedness communication.

METHODS

In the present investigation, we tested the efficacy of a professionally produced video that uses the federally endorsed slogan, Run-Hide-Fight(r). Undergraduate students participated in a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest-delayed posttest control group design.

RESULTS

Using the theory of planned behavior as our guiding framework, we found that video exposure increased attitudes, perceived norms, perceived behavioral control, intentions, as well as knowledge of recommended behavioral responses. Favorable attitudes and injunctive norms positively predicted intentions at the initial and delayed posttests. Importantly, the video's effects on most of the outcomes endured two weeks after video exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief emergency preparedness video using the Run-Hide-Fight(r) theme can have immediate and lingering effects on psychosocial predictors of appropriate emergency response behaviors.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Administrators at higher education institutions should consider showing emergency preparedness messages to increase the likelihood that stakeholders will take appropriate action in case of a campus threat. In particular, these messages should aim to promote favorable attitudes toward appropriate response behaviors and instill beliefs that appropriate responses ought to be performed.

摘要

简介

鉴于高等教育机构面临的各种紧急情况,高校管理人员必须采取多模式方法,让校园利益相关者为安全威胁做好准备。其中一种策略是应急准备沟通。

方法

在本研究中,我们测试了一个使用联邦认可的口号“Run-Hide-Fight(r)”的专业制作的视频的功效。本科生参与了一项具有前测-后测-延迟后测对照组设计的准实验。

结果

以计划行为理论为指导框架,我们发现,视频曝光增加了态度、感知规范、感知行为控制、意图以及对推荐行为反应的知识。在初始和延迟后测中,有利的态度和约束性规范积极预测了意图。重要的是,视频对大多数结果的影响在视频曝光两周后仍在持续。

结论

使用“Run-Hide-Fight(r)”主题的简短应急准备视频可以对适当应急反应行为的社会心理预测因素产生即时和持久的影响。

实用应用

高等教育机构的管理人员应考虑播放应急准备信息,以增加利益相关者在校园威胁情况下采取适当行动的可能性。特别是,这些信息应该旨在促进对适当反应行为的有利态度,并灌输应该采取适当反应的信念。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of a college campus emergency preparedness intervention.高校校园突发事件应急准备干预评估
J Safety Res. 2018 Jun;65:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
2
What's at Stake: Evaluating a Run-Hide-Fight® Intervention Video through the Lens of Vested Interest Theory.利害关系所在:从既得利益理论的角度评估“跑-躲-打”干预视频。
J Health Commun. 2020 Dec 1;25(12):982-989. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1885084. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
3
"Saving Students' Lives": Instructor Sharing of Run-Hide-Fight® Emergency Preparedness Materials.“拯救学生生命”:教师分享“跑、躲、防”应急准备材料。
J Prev (2022). 2024 Apr;45(2):213-225. doi: 10.1007/s10935-023-00764-w. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
4
The relationship of perceived campus culture to mental health help-seeking intentions.感知到的校园文化与心理健康求助意愿之间的关系。
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Nov;63(6):677-684. doi: 10.1037/cou0000095. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
5
Separating subjective norms, university descriptive and injunctive norms, and U.S. descriptive and injunctive norms for drinking behavior intentions. 将主观规范、大学描述性和规定性规范以及美国描述性和规定性规范分离出来,用于预测饮酒行为意向。
Health Commun. 2009 Dec;24(8):746-51. doi: 10.1080/10410230903265912.
6
After Virginia Tech: an analysis of Internet and social media use in campus emergency preparedness.
J Emerg Manag. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):303-12. doi: 10.5055/jem.2013.0146.
7
Disaster Preparedness Among University Students in Guangzhou, China: Assessment of Status and Demand for Disaster Education.中国广州大学生的灾害准备情况:灾害教育现状与需求评估
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017 Jun;11(3):310-317. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2016.124. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
8
The effect of coping knowledge on emergency preparedness in elementary school students.应对知识对小学生应急准备的影响。
J Sch Nurs. 2014 Oct;30(5):349-57. doi: 10.1177/1059840513508325. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
9
Pandemic flu knowledge among dormitory housed university students: a need for informal social support and social networking strategies.宿舍居住的大学生对大流行性流感的认知:对非正式社会支持和社交网络策略的需求
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;10(4):1526. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
10
Student intentions to engage instructors in mental health-related conversations: An application of the theory of planned behavior.学生参与心理健康相关对话的意愿:计划行为理论的应用。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Apr;72(3):914-922. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2060710. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Willingness to reduce alcohol consumption predicted by short-form video exposure, media involvement, psychological bias, and cognitive factor.短视频曝光、媒体参与度、心理偏差和认知因素对减少酒精消费意愿的预测作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;15:1213539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1213539. eCollection 2024.
2
Framing Slogans for Responsible Gambling Campaigns: A Tale of Two Models.为负责任赌博活动拟定标语:两种模式的故事
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;11(20):2754. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202754.
3
Characteristics and statistical analysis of university accidents in China from 2017 to 2021.
2017年至2021年中国高校事故的特征及统计分析
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 11;9(10):e20616. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20616. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Evaluation and Obstacle Analysis of Emergency Response Capability in China.中国应急响应能力的评估与障碍分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10200. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610200.
5
Data of risk analysis management in university campuses.大学校园风险分析管理数据。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Dec 9;13(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05397-4.
6
Applying health, safety, and environmental risk assessment at academic settings.在学术环境中应用健康、安全和环境风险评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):1328. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09419-5.