Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Leuven Kanker Instituut, UZ Gasthuisberg, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversitary Center Leuven (PartICLe), Belgium.
Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands; Proton Therapy Department South-East Netherlands (ZON-PTC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jul;128(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 17.
For unbiased comparison of different radiation modalities and techniques, consensus on delineation of radiation sensitive organs at risk (OARs) and on their dose constraints is warranted. Following the publication of a digital, online atlas for OAR delineation in neuro-oncology by the same group, we assessed the brain OAR-dose constraints in a follow-up study.
We performed a comprehensive search to identify the current papers on OAR dose constraints for normofractionated photon and particle therapy in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science. Moreover, the included articles' reference lists were cross-checked for potential studies that met the inclusion criteria. Consensus was reached among 20 radiation oncology experts in the field of neuro-oncology.
For the OARs published in the neuro-oncology literature, we summarized the available literature and recommended dose constraints associated with certain levels of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) according to the recent ICRU recommendations. For those OARs with lacking or insufficient NTCP data, a proposal for effective and efficient data collection is given.
The use of the European Particle Therapy Network-consensus OAR dose constraints summarized in this article is recommended for the model-based approach comparing photon and proton beam irradiation as well as for prospective clinical trials including novel radiation techniques and/or modalities.
为了公正比较不同的放射治疗方式和技术,有必要就勾画危及器官(OARs)以及剂量限制达成共识。在同一组发表了用于神经肿瘤学 OAR 勾画的数字化在线图谱之后,我们在一项后续研究中评估了脑 OAR 剂量限制。
我们在 PubMed、Ovid Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 Web of Science 中进行了全面检索,以确定目前关于常规定分次光子和粒子治疗的 OAR 剂量限制的论文。此外,还交叉检查了纳入文章的参考文献列表,以寻找符合纳入标准的潜在研究。20 位神经肿瘤学领域的放射肿瘤学专家达成了共识。
对于神经肿瘤学文献中发表的 OAR,我们根据最近的 ICRU 建议,总结了可用的文献,并推荐了与特定正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)水平相关的剂量限制。对于那些缺乏或 NTCP 数据不足的 OAR,我们提出了有效的数据收集建议。
建议在基于模型的方法中使用本文总结的欧洲粒子治疗网络共识 OAR 剂量限制,以比较光子和质子束照射,以及包括新型放射治疗技术和/或方式的前瞻性临床试验。