Sullivan Martin J P, Davy Anthony J, Grant Alastair, Mossman Hannah L
School of Geography University of Leeds Leeds UK.
School of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich UK.
J Appl Ecol. 2018 May;55(3):1207-1217. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13033. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Restored habitats, such as saltmarsh created through managed realignment, sometimes fail to meet targets for biological equivalence with natural reference sites. Understanding why this happens is important in order to improve restoration outcomes.Elevation in the tidal frame and sediment redox potential are major controls on the distribution of saltmarsh plants. We use niche models to characterize 10 species' responses to these, and test whether differences in species occurrence between restored and natural saltmarshes in the UK result from failure to recreate adequate environmental conditions.Six species occurred less frequently in recently restored marshes than natural marshes. Failure of restored marshes to achieve the elevation and redox conditions of natural marshes partially explained the underrepresentation of five of these species, but did not explain patterns of occurrence on older (>50 years) restored marshes.For all species, an effect of marsh age remained after controlling for differences in environmental conditions. This could be due to differences in successional mechanism between restored and natural marshes. In recently restored marshes, high-marsh species occurred lower in the tidal frame and low-marsh species occurred higher in the tidal frame than in natural marshes. This supports the hypothesis that competition is initially weaker in restored marshes, because of the availability of bare sediment across the whole tidal frame. Species that establish outside their normal realized niche, such as , may inhibit subsequent colonization of other species that occurred less frequently than expected on older restored marshes. . Niche models can be used to test whether abiotic differences between restored sites and their natural counterparts are responsible for discrepancies in species occurrence. In saltmarshes, simply replicating environmental conditions will not result in equivalent species occurrence.
恢复后的栖息地,如通过管理性海岸带调整创建的盐沼,有时无法达到与自然参考地点生物等效性的目标。了解这种情况发生的原因对于改善恢复结果很重要。潮汐框架中的高程和沉积物氧化还原电位是盐沼植物分布的主要控制因素。我们使用生态位模型来描述10个物种对这些因素的响应,并测试英国恢复的盐沼和天然盐沼之间物种出现的差异是否是由于未能重新创造足够的环境条件所致。
最近恢复的盐沼中,有6个物种的出现频率低于天然盐沼。恢复的盐沼未能达到天然盐沼的高程和氧化还原条件,部分解释了其中5个物种的代表性不足,但无法解释较老(>50年)恢复盐沼上的物种出现模式。
对于所有物种,在控制环境条件差异后,沼泽年龄的影响仍然存在。这可能是由于恢复的盐沼和天然盐沼之间演替机制的差异。在最近恢复的盐沼中,高潮带物种在潮汐框架中的位置比天然盐沼低,低潮带物种在潮汐框架中的位置比天然盐沼高。这支持了这样的假设,即由于整个潮汐框架中裸露沉积物的存在,恢复的盐沼中竞争最初较弱。在正常实现的生态位之外建立的物种,如 ,可能会抑制其他物种在较老恢复盐沼上的后续定殖,而这些物种的出现频率低于预期。 。生态位模型可用于测试恢复地点与其天然对应地点之间的非生物差异是否是物种出现差异的原因。在盐沼中,简单地复制环境条件不会导致等效的物种出现。