Liu Han, Sintay Benjamin, Pearman Keith, Shang Qingyang, Hayes Lane, Maurer Jacqueline, Vanderstraeten Caroline, Wiant David
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, NC, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Jul;19(4):155-162. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12355. Epub 2018 May 20.
The photon optimization (PO) algorithm was recently released by Varian Medical Systems to improve volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) optimization within Eclipse (Version 13.5). The purpose of this study is to compare the PO algorithm with its predecessor, progressive resolution optimizer (PRO) for lung SBRT and brain SRS treatments. A total of 30 patients were selected retrospectively. Previously, all the plans were generated with the PRO algorithm within Eclipse Version 13.6. In the new version of PO algorithm (Version 15), dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) were first conformed to the target, then VMAT inverse planning was performed to achieve the desired dose distributions. PTV coverages were forced to be identical for the same patient for a fair comparison. SBRT plan quality was assessed based on selected dose-volume parameters, including the conformity index, V for lung, V for chest wall, and D for other critical organs. SRS plan quality was evaluated based on the conformity index and normal tissue volumes encompassed by the 12 and 6 Gy isodose lines (V and V ). The modulation complexity score (MCS) was used to compare plan complexity of two algorithms. No statistically significant differences between the PRO and PO algorithms were found for any of the dosimetric parameters studied, which indicates both algorithms produce comparable plan quality. Significant improvements in the gamma passing rate (increased from 97.0% to 99.2% for SBRT and 96.1% to 98.4% for SRS), MCS (average increase of 0.15 for SBRT and 0.10 for SRS), and delivery efficiency (MU reduction of 29.8% for SBRT and 28.3% for SRS) were found for the PO algorithm. MCS showed a strong correlation with the gamma passing rate, and an inverse correlation with total MUs used. The PO algorithm offers comparable plan quality to the PRO, while minimizing MLC complexity, thereby improving the delivery efficiency and accuracy.
瓦里安医疗系统公司最近发布了光子优化(PO)算法,以改进Eclipse(版本13.5)中的容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)优化。本研究的目的是比较PO算法与其前身渐进分辨率优化器(PRO)在肺部立体定向放疗(SBRT)和脑部立体定向放射治疗(SRS)中的效果。回顾性选取了30例患者。此前,所有计划均在Eclipse版本13.6中使用PRO算法生成。在新版本的PO算法(版本15)中,首先将动态适形弧(DCA)与靶区适形,然后进行VMAT逆向计划以实现所需的剂量分布。为了进行公平比较,同一患者的计划靶体积(PTV)覆盖率被强制设定为相同。基于选定的剂量体积参数评估SBRT计划质量,包括适形指数、肺V、胸壁V和其他关键器官的D。基于适形指数以及12和6 Gy等剂量线所包含的正常组织体积(V和V)评估SRS计划质量。调制复杂度评分(MCS)用于比较两种算法的计划复杂度。在所研究的任何剂量学参数方面,未发现PRO和PO算法之间存在统计学显著差异,这表明两种算法产生的计划质量相当。发现PO算法在伽马通过率(SBRT从97.0%提高到99.2%,SRS从96.1%提高到98.4%)、MCS(SBRT平均增加0.15,SRS平均增加值为0.10)和递送效率(SBRT的监测单位减少29.8%,SRS减少28.3%)方面有显著改善。MCS与伽马通过率呈强相关,与总监测单位数呈负相关。PO算法提供了与PRO相当的计划质量,同时将多叶准直器(MLC)复杂度降至最低,从而提高了递送效率和准确性。