Korte Scott W, Franklin Craig L, Dorfmeyer Rebecca A, Ericsson Aaron C
Office of Animal Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Metagenomics Center, Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2018 May 1;57(3):229-235.
To protect the biosecurity of research rodent colonies, research institutions frequently require a quarantine period for live animals transferred into their facilities. Quarantine practices often include antibiotic and antiparasitic treatment with drugs such as fenbendazole and macrolide lactones. The influence of these compounds on the resident gut microbiota of mice is unknown, and any effects might subsequently affect model reproducibility. To test the influence of standard quarantine procedures on the composition of the microbiota, C57BL/6 mice, purchased from 2 different commercial suppliers, were randomly assigned to treatment groups (n = 12) by vendor and treated with fenbendazole-supplemented feed, topical moxidectin, both treatments, or no treatment (control), according to our institution's standard treatment regimen and duration. Feces were collected on arrival, immediately after completing the 8-wk treatment, and at 2 and 4 wk after treatment. Fecal DNA was extracted, sequenced, and analyzed to compare the changes in the microbiota of treated and control groups. Although significant main effects of time and treatment and interactions between those variables were detected in comparisons of richness, α-diversity, and β-diversity, the effect sizes associated with any particular treatment were consistently much smaller than that associated with acclimation to a new facility in the absence of any quarantine treatments. This outcome, along with the visual evaluation of principal coordinate analysis based on multiple similarity indices, suggests that time or institution plays a larger role in alterations of the murine gut microbiota than do quarantine treatments on its composition.
为保护实验啮齿动物群落的生物安全,研究机构通常要求对转入其设施的活体动物进行隔离期观察。隔离措施通常包括使用芬苯达唑和大环内酯类等药物进行抗生素和抗寄生虫治疗。这些化合物对小鼠肠道内固有微生物群的影响尚不清楚,其任何影响都可能随后影响模型的可重复性。为了测试标准隔离程序对微生物群组成的影响,从2个不同商业供应商购买的C57BL/6小鼠按供应商随机分配到治疗组(n = 12),并根据我们机构的标准治疗方案和持续时间,用添加芬苯达唑的饲料、莫昔克丁局部用药、两种治疗方法或不进行治疗(对照)。在到达时、完成8周治疗后立即以及治疗后2周和4周收集粪便。提取粪便DNA,进行测序和分析,以比较治疗组和对照组微生物群的变化。尽管在丰富度、α多样性和β多样性的比较中检测到时间和治疗的显著主效应以及这些变量之间的相互作用,但与任何特定治疗相关的效应大小始终远小于在没有任何隔离治疗的情况下适应新设施相关的效应大小。这一结果,连同基于多个相似性指数的主坐标分析的视觉评估,表明时间或机构在小鼠肠道微生物群的改变中比隔离治疗对其组成的影响发挥更大的作用。