Division of Environmental Health and Risk Management, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Assiut University, 71526 Assiut, Egypt.
Division of Environmental Health and Risk Management, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Environ Int. 2018 Sep;118:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.027. Epub 2018 May 26.
Despite extensive application in consumer products and concerns over their adverse health effects, how external exposure to brominated flame retardants (BFRs) contributes to their human body burdens is not yet fully understood. While recent studies focused on inadvertent indoor dust ingestion and diet as potential major pathways of exposure, dermal uptake has been largely overlooked. We provide the first experimentally-based assessment of dermal uptake of BFRs via contact with indoor dust and flame-retarded furniture fabrics. Results reveal substantial uptake from furniture fabrics (e.g. 8.1 ng pentaBDE/kg bw/day for adults in summer), exceeding the overall adult intake of pentaBDE estimated previously via other exposure pathways. For HBCDs, despite the low absorption fraction (<2.5%) from the studied fabrics, the estimated dermal uptake of UK adults and toddlers (101 and 76.9 ng/kg bw/day) exceed the reported average daily intakes of 7.9 and 43.0 ng/kg bw/day for these UK age groups. Conversely, uptake from dust was low (0.05 and 0.19 ng pentaBDE/kg bw/day for adults and toddlers, respectively), indicating previous pharmacokinetic approaches may have overestimated the significance of this route. Future exposure and risk assessment studies should consider dermal contact with treated products as a significant pathway of human exposure to BFRs and related chemicals.
尽管溴系阻燃剂(BFRs)在消费品中得到了广泛应用,并且人们对其对健康的不良影响也存在担忧,但人们对其人体负荷的形成机制仍不完全了解。虽然最近的研究集中在无意间摄入室内灰尘和饮食作为潜在的主要暴露途径,但皮肤吸收在很大程度上被忽视了。我们首次基于实验评估了通过接触室内灰尘和阻燃家具织物对 BFRs 的皮肤吸收。结果表明,从家具织物中(例如,夏季成年人每公斤体重每天吸收五溴二苯醚 8.1ng)吸收了大量 BFRs,超过了之前通过其他暴露途径估计的成年人对五溴二苯醚的总摄入量。对于六溴环十二烷,尽管从研究织物中吸收的分数较低(<2.5%),但估计英国成年人和幼儿的皮肤吸收量(101 和 76.9ng/kg bw/day)超过了报告的这两个英国年龄组的平均每日摄入量 7.9 和 43.0ng/kg bw/day。相反,从灰尘中吸收的量很低(成年人和幼儿分别为每公斤体重每天 0.05 和 0.19ng 五溴二苯醚),表明之前的药代动力学方法可能高估了这种途径的重要性。未来的暴露和风险评估研究应考虑到与处理过的产品的皮肤接触是人体暴露于 BFRs 和相关化学物质的重要途径。