Suppr超能文献

导航策略与效率中的性别差异。

Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.

作者信息

Boone Alexander P, Gong Xinyi, Hegarty Mary

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):909-922. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0811-y.

Abstract

Research on human navigation has indicated that males and females differ in self-reported navigation strategy as well as objective measures of navigation efficiency. In two experiments, we investigated sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency using an objective measure of strategy, the dual-solution paradigm (DSP; Marchette, Bakker, & Shelton, 2011). Although navigation by shortcuts and learned routes were the primary strategies used in both experiments, as in previous research on the DSP, individuals also utilized route reversals and sometimes found the goal location as a result of wandering. Importantly, sex differences were found in measures of both route selection and navigation efficiency. In particular, males were more likely to take shortcuts and reached their goal location faster than females, while females were more likely to follow learned routes and wander. Self-report measures of strategy were only weakly correlated with objective measures of strategy, casting doubt on their usefulness. This research indicates that the sex difference in navigation efficiency is large, and only partially related to an individual's navigation strategy as measured by the dual-solution paradigm.

摘要

对人类导航的研究表明,男性和女性在自我报告的导航策略以及导航效率的客观测量方面存在差异。在两项实验中,我们使用一种策略的客观测量方法——双解决方案范式(DSP;马尔切特、巴克和谢尔顿,2011年),研究了导航策略和效率方面的性别差异。尽管在两项实验中,通过捷径和记忆路线导航都是主要策略,如同之前对双解决方案范式的研究一样,个体也会采用路线折返,有时还会因徘徊而找到目标位置。重要的是,在路线选择和导航效率的测量中都发现了性别差异。具体而言,男性比女性更有可能走捷径,并且更快到达目标位置,而女性则更有可能遵循记忆路线并徘徊。策略的自我报告测量与策略的客观测量之间仅有微弱的相关性,这让人质疑其有用性。这项研究表明,导航效率方面的性别差异很大,并且仅部分与通过双解决方案范式测量的个体导航策略相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验