• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃十二指肠保留幽门手术(SIPS)与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)中期并发症、体重减轻及2型糖尿病缓解情况的分析:三年随访

An Analysis of Mid-Term Complications, Weight Loss, and Type 2 Diabetes Resolution of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus-Sparing Surgery (SIPS) Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with Three-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Cottam Austin, Cottam Daniel, Zaveri Hinali, Cottam Samuel, Surve Amit, Medlin Walter, Richards Christina

机构信息

Bariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2894-2902. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3309-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-3309-6
PMID:29790130
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For many years, the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) was considered a good balance of complications and weight loss. According to several short-term studies, single anastomosis duodenal switch or stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery (SIPS) offers similar weight loss to RYGB with fewer complications and better diabetes resolution. No one has substantiated mid-term complication and nutritional differences between these two procedures. This paper seeks to compare complication and nutritional outcomes between RYGB and SIPS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 798 patients who either had SIPS or RYGB from 2010 to 2016. Complications were gathered for each patient. Nutritional outcomes were measured for each group at 1, 2, and 3 years. Regression analysis was applied to interpolate each patient's weight at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. These were then compared with t tests, Fisher's exact tests, and chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

RYGB and SIPS have statistically similar weight loss at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 36 months. They statistically differ at 18 and 24 months. At 36 months, there is a trend for weight loss difference. There were only statistical differences in nutritional outcomes between the two procedures with calcium at 1 and 3 years and vitamin D at 1 year. There were statistically significantly more long-term class IIIb-V complications, class I-IIIa complications, reoperations, ulcers, small bowel obstructions, nausea, and vomiting with the RYGB than the SIPS.

CONCLUSION

With comparable weight loss and nutritional outcomes, SIPS has fewer short- and long-term complications than RYGB and better type 2 diabetes resolution rates.

摘要

背景

多年来,Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)被认为是并发症与体重减轻之间的良好平衡。根据多项短期研究,单吻合口十二指肠转位术或保留胃幽门的胃小肠吻合术(SIPS)与RYGB相比,体重减轻效果相似,但并发症更少,糖尿病缓解情况更好。尚无研究证实这两种手术在中期并发症和营养方面的差异。本文旨在比较RYGB和SIPS在并发症和营养方面的结果。

方法

对2010年至2016年期间接受SIPS或RYGB手术的798例患者进行回顾性分析。收集每位患者的并发症情况。在术后1年、2年和3年测量每组的营养指标。应用回归分析来推算每位患者在术后3个月、6个月、9个月、12个月、18个月、24个月和36个月时的体重。然后将这些体重与t检验、Fisher精确检验和卡方检验进行比较。

结果

RYGB和SIPS在术后3个月、6个月、9个月、12个月和36个月时的体重减轻情况在统计学上相似。在术后18个月和24个月时,二者在统计学上存在差异。在术后36个月时,体重减轻差异存在一种趋势。两种手术在营养指标方面仅在术后1年和3年的钙以及术后1年的维生素D上存在统计学差异。与SIPS相比,RYGB在长期的IIIb-V级并发症、I-IIIa级并发症、再次手术、溃疡、小肠梗阻、恶心和呕吐方面在统计学上显著更多。

结论

在体重减轻和营养指标相当的情况下,SIPS比RYGB的短期和长期并发症更少,2型糖尿病缓解率更高。

相似文献

1
An Analysis of Mid-Term Complications, Weight Loss, and Type 2 Diabetes Resolution of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus-Sparing Surgery (SIPS) Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with Three-Year Follow-Up.胃十二指肠保留幽门手术(SIPS)与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)中期并发症、体重减轻及2型糖尿病缓解情况的分析:三年随访
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2894-2902. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3309-6.
2
A retrospective comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two year follow-up.在单一机构对胆胰转流十二指肠转位术与单吻合口十二指肠转位术(SIPS-保留胃十二指肠幽门手术)进行回顾性比较,并进行两年随访。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Mar;13(3):415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
3
Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and nutritional status in a single US center.单吻合口十二指肠空肠旁路术(SADI-S)与袖状胃切除术(SADI-S)的对比分析:单美国中心 2 年术后数据评估减肥、2 型糖尿病和营养状况的既定减重手术 请注意,由于这是一段医学学术文献,因此翻译可能会受到具体医学术语和上下文的影响。如果你需要更准确的翻译,请提供更多的背景信息和上下文。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Jan;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
Single anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m: a multi-centered comparative analysis.BMI≥50kg/m²患者行单吻合口十二指肠转流术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的对比:一项多中心对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2657-2665. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10765-3. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
5
[Comparison of 1-year outcomes between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y duodenojejunal bypass in the patients of obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus].[肥胖合并2型糖尿病患者中Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术加Roux-en-Y十二指肠空肠旁路术1年结局的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 25;26(11):1051-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230817-00056.
6
Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities.袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术的长期随访:减肥和缓解合并症的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
A Matched Cohort Analysis of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus Saving (SIPS) Surgery Versus Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch with Two-Year Follow-up.保留胃十二指肠幽门(SIPS)手术与胆胰转流十二指肠转位术的匹配队列分析及两年随访
Obes Surg. 2017 Feb;27(2):454-461. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2341-7.
8
Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies.随机对照试验比较 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass 与 Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass 治疗肥胖症:YOMEGA 研究与台湾研究的比较。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3047-3053. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04065-2.
9
Single- or double-anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional procedure for sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单吻合口或双吻合口十二指肠转位术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术作为袖状胃切除术的翻修术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Apr;15(4):556-566. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
10
A prospective single-center study evaluating the efficacy of the stomach, intestinal, and pylorus-sparing procedure.一项前瞻性单中心研究,评估胃、肠和幽门保留术的疗效。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Jun;19(6):612-618. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.12.020. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
One-Year Outcomes of SADI-S in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.中国2型糖尿病且体重指数(BMI)< 35kg/m²患者接受SADI-S手术的一年结局:一项单中心回顾性研究
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07872-y.
2
Comparison of SADI-S Versus SG in Chinese with Diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m2:a Retrospective Study with Medium-Term Outcomes.在中国糖尿病患者且体重指数(BMI)< 35kg/m² 的人群中,SADI-S 与 SG 的比较:一项中期结果的回顾性研究
Obes Surg. 2025 May;35(5):1660-1671. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07809-5. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy/Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/SADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The incidence of complications associated with loop duodeno-ileostomy after single-anastomosis duodenal switch procedures among 1328 patients: a multicenter experience.1328 例患者中单一吻合口十二指肠转流术后与套入式肠吻合相关的并发症发生率:一项多中心经验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.020. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
2
Long-term success and failure with SG is predictable by 3 months: a multivariate model using simple office markers.使用简单的门诊标志物的多变量模型可预测 SG 的 3 个月长期成功和失败。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Aug;13(8):1266-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
胃旁路手术联合单吻合口十二指肠空肠旁路术(SADI-S/SADS)IFSO 立场声明-2023 更新
Obes Surg. 2024 Oct;34(10):3639-3685. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07490-0. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Cumulative Incidence of Venous Thromboembolic Events In-Hospital, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 Months After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Systematic Review of 87 Studies and Meta-analysis of 2,731,797 Patients.代谢和减重手术后住院期间、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时静脉血栓栓塞事件的累积发生率:87 项研究的系统评价和 2731797 例患者的荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jun;34(6):2154-2176. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07184-7. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
5
Evaluation study of single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of Chinese obese patients based on efficacy and nutrition.基于疗效和营养评估的单吻合口十二指肠-空肠旁路袖状胃切除术治疗中国肥胖患者的研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57289-3.
6
The impact of microbially modified metabolites associated with obesity and bariatric surgery on antitumor immunity.与肥胖和减重手术相关的微生物修饰代谢物对抗肿瘤免疫的影响。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 16;14:1156471. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1156471. eCollection 2023.
7
BASP1 promotes high glucose-induced endothelial apoptosis in diabetes via activation of EGFR signaling.BASP1 通过激活 EGFR 信号促进高糖诱导的糖尿病内皮细胞凋亡。
J Diabetes Investig. 2023 Apr;14(4):535-547. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13920. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
8
Metabolic Efficacy and Diabetes Remission Predictors Following 'Sleeve Gastrectomy with Loop Duodenojejunal Bypass' Surgery.“袖状胃切除术联合袢式十二指肠空肠旁路术”术后的代谢疗效及糖尿病缓解预测因素
J Metab Bariatr Surg. 2020 Dec;9(2):33-41. doi: 10.17476/jmbs.2020.9.2.33. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
9
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy with Sleeve: Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Outcomes Using the MBSAQIP.单吻合口胃旁路术与单吻合口空肠回肠旁路术加袖状胃切除术:使用 MBSAQIP 进行 30 天结局的对比分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Mar;33(3):720-724. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06452-2. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
10
Retrospective Comparison of SADI-S Versus RYGB in Chinese with Diabetes and BMI< 35kg/m: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis.回顾性比较 SADI-S 与 RYGB 在 BMI<35kg/m2 的中国糖尿病患者中的疗效:倾向评分调整分析。
Obes Surg. 2021 Dec;31(12):5166-5175. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05708-z. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes - 5-Year Outcomes.
减肥手术与强化药物治疗糖尿病——5年结果
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):641-651. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600869.
4
Rate of Death and Complications in Laparoscopic and Open Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis on 69,494 Patients.腹腔镜与开放Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术的死亡率和并发症发生率。对69494例患者的荟萃分析和元回归分析
Obes Surg. 2016 Aug;26(8):1956-63. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2231-z.
5
A Matched Cohort Analysis of Sleeve Gastrectomy With and Without 300 cm Loop Duodenal Switch With 18-Month Follow-Up.一项对袖状胃切除术联合或不联合300厘米十二指肠袢转位术的配对队列分析及18个月随访
Obes Surg. 2016 Oct;26(10):2363-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2133-0.
6
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass for The Aging Population.针对老年人群的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和胃旁路手术
Obes Surg. 2016 Nov;26(11):2611-2615. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2139-7.
7
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 10-year follow-up: the found population.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术10年随访:研究人群
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 May;12(4):778-782. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
8
Stomach Intestinal Pylorus Sparing (SIPS) Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Retrospective Analyses of Our Preliminary Experience.保留胃十二指肠幽门(SIPS)手术治疗病态肥胖症:我们初步经验的回顾性分析
Obes Surg. 2016 Sep;26(9):2098-2104. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2077-4.
9
Closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial.腹腔镜胃旁路术中小肠缺陷的闭合:一项多中心、随机、平行、开放标签试验。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1397-1404. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01126-5. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
10
Indications and Operative Outcomes of Gastric Bypass Reversal.胃旁路逆转术的适应症及手术结果
Obes Surg. 2016 Oct;26(10):2285-90. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2105-4.