• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单吻合口十二指肠空肠旁路术(SADI-S)与袖状胃切除术(SADI-S)的对比分析:单美国中心 2 年术后数据评估减肥、2 型糖尿病和营养状况的既定减重手术 请注意,由于这是一段医学学术文献,因此翻译可能会受到具体医学术语和上下文的影响。如果你需要更准确的翻译,请提供更多的背景信息和上下文。

Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and nutritional status in a single US center.

机构信息

WakeMed Bariatric Specialists of NC, Cary, North Carolina.

Bariatric Medicine Institute, South Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Jan;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.008
PMID:31753795
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with SG (SADI-S) are recognized bariatric procedures. A comparison has never been made between these 3 procedures and especially in different body mass index (BMI) categories.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to analyze a large cohort of patients undergoing either laparoscopic (L) SG, LRYGB, or LSADI-S to evaluate and compare weight loss and glycosylated hemoglobin level. The secondary aim was to compare the nutritional outcomes between LRYGB and LSADI-S.

SETTING

Private practice, United States.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 878 patients who underwent LSG, LRYGB, or LSADI-S from April 2014 through October 2015 by 5 surgeons in a single institution. For weight loss analysis, the patients were categorized into 4 different categories as follows: patients regardless of their preoperative BMI, patients with preoperative BMI <45 kg/m, patients with preoperative BMI 45 to 55 kg/m, and patients with preoperative BMI >55 kg/m.

RESULTS

A total of 878 patients were identified for analysis. Of 878 patients, 448 patients, 270 patients, and 160 patients underwent LSG, LRYGB, and LSADI-S, respectively. Overall, at 12 and 24 months, the weight loss was highest with LSADI-S, followed by LRYGB and LSG in all 4 categories. At 2 years, the patients lost 19.5, 16.1, and 11.3 BMI points after LSADI-S, LRYGB, and LSG, respectively. In addition, the weight loss was highest in patients with preoperative BMI <45 kg/m and lowest in patients with preoperative BMI >55 kg/m at 12 and 24 months. Also, there were no statistically significant differences between the nutritional outcomes between LRYGB and LSADI-S. The LSADI-S had significantly lower rates of abnormal glycosylated hemoglobin than LRYGB and LSG at 12 months (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The weight loss outcomes and glycosylated hemoglobin rates were better with LSADI-S than LRYGB or LSG. The nutritional outcomes between LRYGB and LSADI-S were similar.

摘要

背景

袖状胃切除术(SG)、Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)和单吻合口十二指肠-空肠旁路术联合 SG(SADI-S)是公认的减重手术。这 3 种手术之间从未进行过比较,尤其是在不同的体重指数(BMI)类别中。

目的

本研究旨在分析一组接受腹腔镜(L)SG、LRYGB 或 LSADI-S 的患者,以评估和比较减重和糖化血红蛋白水平。次要目的是比较 LRYGB 和 LSADI-S 的营养结局。

设置

美国私人诊所。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,共纳入 2014 年 4 月至 2015 年 10 月期间由 5 名外科医生在一家机构中进行的 878 例 LSG、LRYGB 或 LSADI-S 患者。为了进行减重分析,患者被分为以下 4 个不同类别:无论术前 BMI 如何的患者、术前 BMI<45kg/m 的患者、术前 BMI 为 45 至 55kg/m 的患者和术前 BMI>55kg/m 的患者。

结果

共纳入 878 例患者进行分析。878 例患者中,448 例、270 例和 160 例分别接受了 LSG、LRYGB 和 LSADI-S。总体而言,在所有 4 个类别中,LSADI-S 在 12 个月和 24 个月时的减重效果最高,其次是 LRYGB 和 LSG。2 年后,LSADI-S、LRYGB 和 LSG 组患者分别减重 19.5、16.1 和 11.3 BMI 点。此外,术前 BMI<45kg/m 的患者在 12 个月和 24 个月时减重效果最高,而术前 BMI>55kg/m 的患者减重效果最低。此外,LRYGB 和 LSADI-S 之间的营养结局无统计学差异。LSADI-S 在 12 个月时的糖化血红蛋白异常率明显低于 LRYGB 和 LSG(P<0.001)。

结论

LSADI-S 的减重效果和糖化血红蛋白水平优于 LRYGB 或 LSG。LRYGB 和 LSADI-S 的营养结局相似。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and nutritional status in a single US center.单吻合口十二指肠空肠旁路术(SADI-S)与袖状胃切除术(SADI-S)的对比分析:单美国中心 2 年术后数据评估减肥、2 型糖尿病和营养状况的既定减重手术 请注意,由于这是一段医学学术文献,因此翻译可能会受到具体医学术语和上下文的影响。如果你需要更准确的翻译,请提供更多的背景信息和上下文。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Jan;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
2
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
3
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Diabetes and Obesity: a Prospective Randomised Double-Blind Trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与带环 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗糖尿病和肥胖症:一项前瞻性随机双盲试验
Obes Surg. 2018 Feb;28(2):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2872-6.
4
Population Diversity Challenge the External Validity of the European Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.人群多样性对比较腹腔镜胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的欧洲随机对照试验的外部有效性提出挑战。
Obes Surg. 2020 Mar;30(3):992-1000. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04247-y.
5
Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.胃束带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比转换为袖状胃切除术能获得更大的减重效果:5 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
6
Comparison of results after one year between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m².体重指数(BMI)≥50kg/m²的患者中,袖状胃切除术与胃旁路手术一年后结果的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.022. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
Comparison of Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Lebanese Bariatric Surgical Practice.黎巴嫩减重手术实践中腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的疗效比较。
Obes Surg. 2018 Feb;28(2):396-404. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2849-5.
8
[Analysis of the 1-year curative efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in patients with super obesity].[袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术联合单吻合十二指肠-回肠旁路术以及胆胰转流十二指肠转位术治疗超级肥胖患者的1年疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 25;26(9):859-865. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20221025-00431.
9
Conversions After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Regain: to Single and Double Anastomosis Duodenal Switch and Gastric Bypass at a Single Institution.袖状胃切除术后体重反弹的再次手术:单吻合口十二指肠转位和胃旁路术在单机构中的应用。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):48-53. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3514-3.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity in a military institution.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗军队机构中病态肥胖的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A Ring-Augmented Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with MiniMizer Ring is Effective and Safe in Patients with a BMI >50 kg/m.使用MiniMizer环的环形增强Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对BMI>50kg/m²的患者有效且安全。
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07988-1.
2
One-Year Outcomes of SADI-S in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.中国2型糖尿病且体重指数(BMI)< 35kg/m²患者接受SADI-S手术的一年结局:一项单中心回顾性研究
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07872-y.
3
Comparison of SADI-S Versus SG in Chinese with Diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m2:a Retrospective Study with Medium-Term Outcomes.
在中国糖尿病患者且体重指数(BMI)< 35kg/m² 的人群中,SADI-S 与 SG 的比较:一项中期结果的回顾性研究
Obes Surg. 2025 May;35(5):1660-1671. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07809-5. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
4
Early results of laparoscopic single‑anastomosis duodeno‑ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: a case series from a single Polish bariatric center.腹腔镜下单吻合十二指肠-回肠旁路术联合袖状胃切除术的早期结果:来自波兰一家减肥中心的病例系列研究
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Nov 19;19(4):460-464. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17912. eCollection 2024 Dec 27.
5
Based on Propensity Matching Scores: Comparison of the Mid-term Outcomes of Two Bariatric Surgeries for the Treatment of Obesity and its Complications.基于倾向匹配评分:两种减肥手术治疗肥胖症及其并发症的中期结果比较
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07642-2. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
6
Comparative effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries: a network meta-analysis.代谢与减重手术的比较效果:一项网状荟萃分析。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Jan;49(1):54-62. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01648-7. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
7
Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy/Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/SADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2023.胃旁路手术联合单吻合口十二指肠空肠旁路术(SADI-S/SADS)IFSO 立场声明-2023 更新
Obes Surg. 2024 Oct;34(10):3639-3685. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07490-0. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
8
Perioperative Safety and 1-Year Outcomes of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI) vs. Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS): A Randomized Clinical Trial.单吻合口十二指肠空肠旁路术(SADI)与胆胰分流十二指肠转位术(BPD/DS)的围手术期安全性和 1 年结局:一项随机临床试验。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3382-3389. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07421-z. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Analysis of the 1-year efficacy of four different surgical methods for treating Chinese super obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m) patients.分析四种不同手术方法治疗中国超肥胖(BMI≥50kg/m)患者的 1 年疗效。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 7;14(1):10451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60983-x.
10
Evaluation study of single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of Chinese obese patients based on efficacy and nutrition.基于疗效和营养评估的单吻合口十二指肠-空肠旁路袖状胃切除术治疗中国肥胖患者的研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6522. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57289-3.