Nyström Markus B T, Kjellberg Emilie, Heimdahl Ulrica, Jonsson Bert
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bull Menninger Clin. 2018 Spring;82(2):137-155. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2018.82.2.137.
The present study investigated gender differences in interpersonal sensitivity and internalized shame coping strategies in 252 undergraduate students. To measure interpersonal sensitivity and shame coping strategies, the self-assessment forms Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure and Compass of Shame Scale were used. The analyses revealed that compared to men, women display interpersonal sensitivity to a higher degree, and they use internalized shame coping strategies to a greater extent. The results also showed that interpersonal sensitivity is highly correlated with shame coping strategies. However, in contrast to earlier research, no gender difference was found, and gender did not significantly mediate the association between interpersonal sensitivity and internalized shame coping. These results could aid clinicians and researchers in promoting, designing, delivering, and evaluating treatments for patients with, for example, depression, anxiety, and interpersonal and/or relational problems.
本研究调查了252名本科生在人际敏感性和内化羞耻应对策略方面的性别差异。为了测量人际敏感性和羞耻应对策略,使用了自评表格《人际敏感性量表》和《羞耻量表指南针》。分析显示,与男性相比,女性表现出更高程度的人际敏感性,并且她们在更大程度上使用内化羞耻应对策略。结果还表明,人际敏感性与羞耻应对策略高度相关。然而,与早期研究不同的是,未发现性别差异,并且性别并未显著调节人际敏感性与内化羞耻应对之间的关联。这些结果有助于临床医生和研究人员推广、设计、提供和评估针对例如抑郁症、焦虑症以及人际和/或关系问题患者的治疗方法。