Suppr超能文献

食品掺假与欧洲输华食品的可信度感知

Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China.

机构信息

School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.

Edinburgh Napier University, Business school, Craiglockhart Campus, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195817. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Persistent incidents of food fraud in China have resulted in low levels of consumer trust in the authenticity and safety of food that is domestically produced. We examined the relationship between the concerns of Chinese consumers regarding food fraud, and the role that demonstrating authenticity may play in relieving those concerns.

METHODS

A two-stage mixed method design research design was adopted. First, qualitative research (focus groups n = 7) was conducted in three Chinese cities, Beijing, Guangzhou and Chengdu to explore concerns held by Chinese consumers in relation to food fraud. A subsequent quantitative survey (n = 850) tested hypotheses derived from the qualitative research and theoretical literature regarding the relationship between attitudinal measures (including risk perceptions, social trust, and perceptions of benefit associated with demonstrating authenticity), and behavioral intention to purchase "authentic" European products using structural equation modelling.

RESULTS

Chinese consumers perceive food fraud to be a hazard that represents a food safety risk. Food hazard concern was identified to be geographically influenced. Consumers in Chengdu (tier 2 city) possessed higher levels of hazard concern compared to consumers in Beijing and Guangzhou (tier 1). Structural trust (i.e. trust in actors and the governance of the food supply chain) was not a significant predictor of attitude and intention to purchase authenticated food products. Consumers were shown to have developed 'risk-relieving' strategies to compensate for the lack of trust in Chinese food and the dissonance experienced as a consequence of food fraud. Indexical and iconic authenticity cues provided by food manufacturers and regulators were important elements of product evaluations, although geographical differences in their perceived importance were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted communication of authenticity assurance measures, including; regulations; enforcement; product testing; and actions taken by industry may improve Chinese consumer trust in the domestic food supply chain and reduce consumer concerns regarding the food safety risks associated with food fraud. To support product differentiation and retain prestige, European food manufactures operating within the Chinese market should recognise regional disparities in consumer risk perceptions regarding food fraud and the importance of personal risk mitigation strategies adopted by Chinese consumers to support the identification of authentic products.

摘要

背景/目的:中国持续发生的食品欺诈事件导致消费者对国产食品的真实性和安全性的信任度较低。我们研究了中国消费者对食品欺诈的担忧与证明真实性可能缓解这些担忧之间的关系。

方法

采用两阶段混合方法设计研究设计。首先,在北京、广州和成都三个中国城市进行了定性研究(焦点小组 n = 7),以探讨中国消费者对食品欺诈的关注。随后,一项定量调查(n = 850)测试了源自定性研究和理论文献的假设,这些假设涉及态度衡量标准(包括风险认知、社会信任和与证明真实性相关的利益感知)与使用结构方程模型购买“真实”欧洲产品的购买意愿之间的关系。

结果

中国消费者认为食品欺诈是一种代表食品安全风险的危害。食品危害关注被确定为具有地域影响。与北京和广州(一线城市)的消费者相比,成都(二线城市)的消费者具有更高的危害关注水平。结构信任(即对行为者和食品供应链治理的信任)不是态度和购买认证食品产品意愿的重要预测因素。消费者已经开发出“风险缓解”策略来弥补对中国食品的信任缺失和食品欺诈带来的不和谐。食品制造商和监管机构提供的索引和标志性真实性线索是产品评估的重要要素,尽管在其感知重要性方面存在地域差异。

结论

有针对性地传达真实性保证措施,包括法规、执行、产品测试和行业采取的行动,可能会提高中国消费者对国内食品供应链的信任,并降低消费者对与食品欺诈相关的食品安全风险的担忧。为了支持产品差异化并保持声望,在中国市场运营的欧洲食品制造商应认识到中国消费者对食品欺诈的风险认知以及中国消费者采用的个人风险缓解策略的重要性方面的地区差异,以支持识别真实产品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be3e/5965827/4f37f608249e/pone.0195817.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验