• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品安全信托、风险感知与消费者对食品召回危机中公司信任修复行为的反应

Food Safety Trust, Risk Perception, and Consumers' Response to Company Trust Repair Actions in Food Recall Crises.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China.

School of Marxism, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1270. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041270.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17041270
PMID:32079171
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068368/
Abstract

Food recalls have severe impacts on the operation, reputation, and even the survival of a recalling company involved in a crisis, with consumer trust violation being the immediate threat to the recalling firm. The involved firms adopt trust repair strategies and release messages relevant to these actions to the public. In this research, we developed a conceptual model to analyze consumers' general responses to the food recall, and we then compared the effect of two types of consumer trust repair strategies, i.e., self-sanction and information-sharing. The results show that consumer food safety trust has negative impacts on consumers' protective behavioral intention during a food recall crisis. In the scientific-evidence sharing group, consumers have a higher risk perception, coping appraisal efficacy, information-seeking tendency, and protection behavioral intention. However, consumers' food safety trust fails to predict protection behavioral intention because scientific-evidence actions can either be regarded as an explanation and self-serving, or as useful facts and solutions. Self-sanction actions overcome the disadvantages of information-sharing actions, but consumers still require information on facts of and solutions to the crisis. Therefore, it is recommended that recalling firms combine these two strategies in the case of consumer trust repair in food recall crises. Furthermore, the involved firms are encouraged to employ a third party to release the scientific evidence.

摘要

食品召回对涉及危机的召回公司的运营、声誉甚至生存都有严重影响,而消费者信任的破坏是对召回公司的直接威胁。相关公司会采取信任修复策略,并向公众发布与这些行动相关的信息。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个概念模型来分析消费者对食品召回的一般反应,然后比较了两种类型的消费者信任修复策略,即自我制裁和信息共享的效果。结果表明,消费者食品安全信任对食品召回危机期间消费者的保护行为意向有负面影响。在科学证据共享组中,消费者的风险感知、应对评估效能、信息寻求倾向和保护行为意向更高。然而,消费者的食品安全信任未能预测保护行为意向,因为科学证据的行为既可以被视为一种解释和自我服务,也可以被视为有用的事实和解决方案。自我制裁行动克服了信息共享行动的缺点,但消费者仍然需要了解危机的事实和解决方案。因此,建议召回公司在食品召回危机中结合使用这两种策略来修复消费者信任。此外,还鼓励相关公司利用第三方发布科学证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bff/7068368/037e15ecb1e0/ijerph-17-01270-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bff/7068368/78a12ff0b339/ijerph-17-01270-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bff/7068368/e3790188e4bc/ijerph-17-01270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bff/7068368/037e15ecb1e0/ijerph-17-01270-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bff/7068368/78a12ff0b339/ijerph-17-01270-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bff/7068368/e3790188e4bc/ijerph-17-01270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bff/7068368/037e15ecb1e0/ijerph-17-01270-g003a.jpg

相似文献

1
Food Safety Trust, Risk Perception, and Consumers' Response to Company Trust Repair Actions in Food Recall Crises.食品安全信托、风险感知与消费者对食品召回危机中公司信任修复行为的反应
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1270. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041270.
2
Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China.食品掺假与欧洲输华食品的可信度感知
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195817. eCollection 2018.
3
Food Safety Risk Information-Seeking Intention of WeChat Users in China.食品安全风险信息搜索意愿——中国微信用户。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2376. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072376.
4
Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.消费者安全消费非理性行为及其影响因素研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;15(12):2764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122764.
5
Seeking and using intention of health information from doctors in social media: The effect of doctor-consumer interaction.从社交媒体中的医生处寻求和使用健康信息的意图:医患互动的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
6
When food governance matters to consumer food choice: Consumer perception of and preference for food quality certifications.当食品安全治理影响消费者的食物选择时:消费者对食品质量认证的认知和偏好。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105688. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105688. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
The impact of transaction trust on consumers' intentions to adopt m-commerce: a cross-cultural investigation.交易信任对消费者采用移动商务意愿的影响:一项跨文化调查。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Apr;12(2):225-9. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0212.
8
Consumers' Awareness and Trust Toward Food Safety News on Social Media in Malaysia.马来西亚消费者对社交媒体食品安全新闻的认知和信任。
J Food Prot. 2020 Mar 1;83(3):452-459. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-415.
9
Consumer-perceived risks of genetically modified food in China.中国消费者对转基因食品的认知风险。
Appetite. 2020 Apr 1;147:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104520. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Should I stay, or should I go? Consumers' perceived risk and intention to visit restaurants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.我是去还是留?巴西消费者对 COVID-19 大流行期间访问餐厅的感知风险和意愿。
Food Res Int. 2021 Mar;141:110152. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110152. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Food Safety Policies in Portugal: A Stakeholder-Based Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities for Food Safety Governance.评估葡萄牙食品安全政策的有效性:基于利益相关者的食品安全治理挑战与机遇分析
Foods. 2025 Apr 27;14(9):1534. doi: 10.3390/foods14091534.
2
Consumer behavior and its role in E. coli outbreaks: the impact of fast-food preparation practices and hygiene awareness.消费者行为及其在大肠杆菌疫情中的作用:快餐制备做法和卫生意识的影响。
Trop Med Health. 2025 Feb 24;53(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00710-y.
3
Exploring Risk Factors of Recall-Associated Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in the United States, 2009-2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Food Safety Incident, Public Health Concern, and Risk Spillover Heterogeneity: Avian Influenza Shocks as Natural Experiments in China's Consumer Markets.食品安全事件、公共卫生关注和风险溢出异质性:中国消费者市场中的禽流感冲击作为自然实验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;16(21):4182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214182.
2
Association of Internet Use with Attitudes Toward Food Safety in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.互联网使用与中国食品安全态度的关联:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 28;16(21):4162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214162.
3
Cognitive Biases of Consumers' Risk Perception of Foodborne Diseases in China: Examining Anchoring Effect.
探究 2009-2019 年美国与召回相关的食源性疾病暴发的危险因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;19(9):4947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094947.
4
Spillover effects of food recalls: A milk recall scenario experiment in China.食品召回的溢出效应:中国的一个牛奶召回情景实验
NPJ Sci Food. 2022 Apr 22;6(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41538-022-00139-1.
5
Public Awareness of Consumer Products Containing Radioactive Materials: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia.公众对含有放射性材料的消费品的认知:来自马来西亚的实证证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042326.
6
What Motivates Consumer Food Safety Perceptions and Beliefs? A Scoping Review in BRICS Countries.是什么影响了消费者对食品安全的认知和信念?金砖国家的一项范围综述。
Foods. 2022 Feb 1;11(3):432. doi: 10.3390/foods11030432.
7
Food packaging during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consumer perceptions.新冠疫情期间的食品包装:消费者认知
Int J Consum Stud. 2022 Mar;46(2):434-448. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12691. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Does Government Intervention Ensure Food Safety? Evidence from China.政府干预能否确保食品安全?来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;18(7):3645. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073645.
9
The Influence Mechanism of Reputation Information on the Formation of Safety Trust in Chinese Infant Milk Powder.中国婴幼儿奶粉声誉信息对安全信任形成的影响机制
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 May 20;8(2):138. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020138.
消费者对中国食源性疾病风险感知的认知偏差:锚定效应的检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(13):2268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132268.
4
Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public's Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China.食品安全风险感知是否会影响公众对政府的信任?基于全国性调查的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 28;16(11):1874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111874.
5
An Augmented Risk Information Seeking Model: Perceived Food Safety Risk Related to Food Recalls.增强型风险信息搜索模型:与食品召回相关的感知食品安全风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 21;15(9):1800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091800.
6
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1.恐惧诉求与态度改变的保护动机理论1。
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803.
7
An empirical study of the toxic capsule crisis in China: risk perceptions and behavioral responses.中国毒胶囊危机的实证研究:风险认知与行为反应
Risk Anal. 2014 Apr;34(4):698-710. doi: 10.1111/risa.12099. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
8
Public risk perception of food additives and food scares. The case in Suzhou, China.公众对食品添加剂和食品安全问题的风险感知。以中国苏州为例。
Appetite. 2013 Nov;70:90-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.06.091. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
9
The risk perception paradox--implications for governance and communication of natural hazards.风险感知悖论——对自然灾害治理和沟通的启示。
Risk Anal. 2013 Jun;33(6):1049-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
10
Multiple health risk perception and information processing among African Americans and whites living in poverty.生活贫困的非裔美国人和白人的多重健康风险感知和信息处理。
Risk Anal. 2011 Nov;31(11):1789-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01621.x. Epub 2011 May 2.