Torres Fernanda Ferrari Esteves, Guerreiro-Tanomaru Juliane Maria, Bosso-Martelo Roberta, Chavez-Andrade Gisselle Moraima, Tanomaru Filho Mario
Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brasil.
Departamento de Clínica Odontologia, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brasil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20170465. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0465. Epub 2018 May 21.
To evaluate the absorption/fluid uptake, solubility and porosity of White mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Angelus, Biodentine (BIO), and zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE).
Solubility was evaluated after immersion in distilled water for 7 and 30 days. Porosity was evaluated using digital inverted microscope, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). For the fluid uptake test, specimens were immersed in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) for 1, 7, 14 and 28 days. Fluid absorption, solubility and porosity of the materials were measured after each period. Statistical evaluation was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests, with a significance level at 5%.
After 7 and 30 days, BIO showed the highest solubility (p<0.05). All methods demonstrated that MTA had total porosity higher than BIO and ZOE (p<0.05). Micro-CT analysis showed that MTA had the highest porosity at the initial period, after its setting time (p<0.05). After 7 and 30 days, ZOE had porosity lower than MTA and BIO (p<0.05). Absorption was similar among the materials (p>0.05), and higher fluid uptake and solubility were observed for MTA in the fluid uptake test (p<0.05).
BIO had the highest solubility in the conventional test and MTA had higher porosity and fluid uptake. ZOE had lower values of solubility, porosity and fluid uptake. Solubility, porosity and fluid uptake are related, and the tests used provided complementary data.
评估白色三氧化矿物凝聚体(MTA)安捷鲁斯、生物活性玻璃(BIO)和氧化锌丁香酚(ZOE)的吸收/液体摄取、溶解度和孔隙率。
将材料浸泡在蒸馏水中7天和30天后评估其溶解度。使用数字倒置显微镜、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估孔隙率。对于液体摄取测试,将标本浸泡在汉克平衡盐溶液(HBSS)中1天、7天、14天和28天。在每个时间段后测量材料的液体吸收、溶解度和孔隙率。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey检验进行统计评估,显著性水平为5%。
7天和30天后,BIO显示出最高的溶解度(p<0.05)。所有方法均表明,MTA的总孔隙率高于BIO和ZOE(p<0.05)。Micro-CT分析表明,MTA在凝固时间后的初始阶段孔隙率最高(p<0.05)。7天和30天后,ZOE的孔隙率低于MTA和BIO(p<0.05)。材料之间的吸收情况相似(p>0.05),在液体摄取测试中观察到MTA的液体摄取和溶解度更高(p<0.05)。
在传统测试中,BIO的溶解度最高,MTA的孔隙率和液体摄取率更高。ZOE的溶解度、孔隙率和液体摄取率较低。溶解度、孔隙率和液体摄取率相互关联,所使用的测试提供了补充数据。