Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics,University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich,Zurich,Switzerland.
Pychiatric Services Aargau AG,Departement Geronto- and NeuropsychiatryDättwil,Switzerland.
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Feb;17(1):74-81. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000202. Epub 2018 May 24.
The importance of the proper identification of delirium, with its high incidence and adversities in the intensive care setting, has been widely recognized. One common screening instrument is the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC); however, the symptom profile and key features of delirium dependent on the level of sedation have not yet been evaluated.
In this prospective cohort study, the ICDSC was evaluated versus the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th edition, text revision, diagnosis of delirium set as standard with respect to the symptom profile, and correct identification of delirium. The aim of this study was to identify key features of delirium in the intensive care setting dependent on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale levels of sedation: drowsiness versus alert and calmness.ResultThe 88 delirious patients of 225 were older, had more severe disease, and prolonged hospitalization. Irrespective of the level of sedation, delirium was correctly classified by items related to inattention, disorientation, psychomotor alterations, inappropriate speech or mood, and symptom fluctuation. In the drowsy patients, inattention reached substantial sensitivity and specificity, whereas psychomotor alterations and sleep-wake cycle disturbances were sensitive lacked specificity. The positive prediction was substantial across items, whereas the negative prediction was only moderate. In the alert and calm patient, the sensitivities were substantial for psychomotor alterations, sleep-wake cycle disturbances, and symptom fluctuations; however, these fluctuations were not specific. The positive prediction was moderate and the negative prediction substantial. Between the nondelirious drowsy and alert, the symptom profile was similar; however, drowsiness was associated with alterations in consciousness.Significance of resultsIn the clinical routine, irrespective of the level of sedation, delirium was characterized by the ICDSC items for inattention, disorientation, psychomotor alterations, inappropriate speech or mood and symptom fluctuation. Further, drowsiness caused altered levels of consciousness.
人们已经广泛认识到,在重症监护环境中,正确识别谵妄的重要性,因为其发病率高,后果严重。一种常见的筛查工具是重症监护谵妄筛查检查表(ICDSC);然而,依赖镇静水平的谵妄的症状谱和关键特征尚未得到评估。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,使用 ICDSC 评估《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)诊断为谵妄的标准,评估其与症状谱和正确识别谵妄的关系。本研究的目的是确定重症监护环境中依赖镇静水平(昏睡与警觉和镇静)的谵妄的关键特征。
225 例患者中有 88 例患有谵妄,这些患者年龄较大,疾病更严重,住院时间更长。无论镇静水平如何,与注意力不集中、定向障碍、精神运动改变、不当言语或情绪以及症状波动相关的项目都正确地对谵妄进行了分类。在昏睡患者中,注意力不集中具有较高的敏感性和特异性,而精神运动改变和睡眠-觉醒周期障碍具有较高的敏感性,特异性较低。各项指标的阳性预测值均较高,而阴性预测值仅为中等。在警觉和镇静患者中,精神运动改变、睡眠-觉醒周期障碍和症状波动的敏感性较高,但这些波动特异性较低。阳性预测值为中等,阴性预测值为较高。在非谵妄的昏睡和警觉患者中,症状谱相似;然而,昏睡与意识改变有关。
在临床常规中,无论镇静水平如何,谵妄都表现为 ICDSC 的注意力不集中、定向障碍、精神运动改变、不当言语或情绪以及症状波动等项目。此外,昏睡会导致意识水平改变。