Suppr超能文献

重症监护环境下基于 Richmond 意识-镇静量表(RASS)的谵妄:注意力不集中和视空间障碍作为潜在的筛查领域。

Delirium in the intensive care setting dependent on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS): Inattention and visuo-spatial impairment as potential screening domains.

机构信息

Department of Consultation-Psychiatry and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091Zurich, Switzerland.

Department Geronto- and Neuropsychiatry, Psychiatry Services Aargau AG (PDAG), Husmatt 1, 5405Dättwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2020 Apr;18(2):148-157. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000683.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the intensive care setting, delirium is a common occurrence; however, the impact of the level of alertness has never been evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the delirium characteristics in the drowsy, as well as the alert and calm patient.

METHOD

In this prospective cohort study, 225 intensive care patients with Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) scores of -1 - drowsy and 0 - alert and calm were evaluated with the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-1998 (DRS-R-98) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 4th edition text revision (DSM-IV-TR)-determined diagnosis of delirium.

RESULTS

In total, 85 drowsy and 140 alert and calm patients were included. Crucial items for the correct identification of delirium were sleep-wake cycle disturbances, language abnormalities, thought process alterations, psychomotor retardation, disorientation, inattention, short- and long-term memory, as well as visuo-spatial impairment, and the temporal onset. Conversely, perceptual disturbances, delusions, affective lability, psychomotor agitation, or fluctuations were items, which identified delirium less correctly. Further, the severities of inattentiveness and visuo-spatial impairment were indicative of delirium in both alert- or calmness and drowsiness.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The impairment in the cognitive domain, psychomotor retardation, and sleep-wake cycle disturbances correctly identified delirium irrespective of the level alertness. Further, inattentiveness and - to a lesser degree - visuo-spatial impairment could represent a specific marker for delirium in the intensive care setting meriting further evaluation.

摘要

目的

在重症监护环境中,谵妄很常见;然而,警觉程度的影响从未被评估过。因此,本研究旨在评估困倦、警觉和安静患者的谵妄特征。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,对 225 名重症监护患者进行评估,这些患者的 Richmond 躁动镇静量表(RASS)评分为-1(困倦)和 0(警觉和安静),使用谵妄评定量表修订版-1998 版(DRS-R-98)和诊断和统计手册第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)确定谵妄的诊断。

结果

总共纳入了 85 名困倦和 140 名警觉和安静的患者。正确识别谵妄的关键项目包括睡眠-觉醒周期紊乱、语言异常、思维过程改变、精神运动迟缓、定向障碍、注意力不集中、短期和长期记忆以及视空间障碍,以及时间发作。相反,知觉障碍、妄想、情感不稳定、精神运动激动或波动是识别谵妄不太准确的项目。此外,警觉或安静状态下的注意力不集中和视空间障碍严重程度表明存在谵妄。

结果的意义

认知领域的损害、精神运动迟缓以及睡眠-觉醒周期紊乱可以正确识别谵妄,而与警觉水平无关。此外,注意力不集中——在较小程度上——视空间障碍可能代表重症监护环境中谵妄的特定标志物,值得进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验