• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护环境中的谵妄和 Richmond 躁动-镇静量表 (RASS):嗜睡增加了谵妄的风险,且处于亚阈值状态。

Delirium in the intensive care setting and the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS): Drowsiness increases the risk and is subthreshold for delirium.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

University Hospital Basel, University Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 8046 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2017 Dec;103:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.011
PMID:29167040
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sedation is a core concept in the intensive care setting, however, the impact of sedation on delirium has not yet been studied to date.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 225 patients with Richmond Agitation and Sedation (RASS) scores of -1 - drowsiness and 0 - alert- and calmness were assessed with the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised 1998 (DRS-R-98) and DSM-IV-TR-determined diagnosis of delirium assessing drowsiness versus alertness.

RESULTS

By itself, drowsiness increased the odds for developing delirium eightfold (OR 7.88 p<0.001) and rates of delirium were 68.2 and 21.4%, respectively. Further, in the drowsy patient, delirium was more severe. In the presence of drowsiness, delirium was characterized by sleep-wake cycle disturbances and language abnormalities. These two features, in addition to psychomotor retardation, allowed the correct classification of delirium at RASS-1. The same features, in addition to thought abnormalities and the impairment in the cognitive domain, orientation, attention, short- and long-term memory representing the core domains of delirium, or the temporal onset were very sensitive towards delirium, however lacked specificity. Conversely, delusions, perceptual abnormalities and lability of affect representing the non-core domain were very specific for delirium in the drowsy, however, not very sensitive. In the absence of delirium, drowsiness caused attentional impairment and language abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Drowsiness increased the odds for developing delirium eightfold and caused more severe delirium, which was characterized by sleep-wake cycle and language abnormalities. Further, drowsiness by itself caused attentional impairment and language abnormalities, thus, with its disturbance in consciousness was subthreshold for delirium.

摘要

引言

镇静是重症监护环境中的核心概念,然而,镇静对谵妄的影响尚未得到研究。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,对 225 名 Richmond 镇静躁动评分(RASS)为-1 (嗜睡)和 0 (警觉和镇静)的患者进行了评估,使用谵妄评定量表修订版 1998 版(DRS-R-98)和 DSM-IV-TR 确定的谵妄诊断评估嗜睡与警觉。

结果

单独的嗜睡使发生谵妄的几率增加了八倍(OR 7.88,p<0.001),谵妄发生率分别为 68.2%和 21.4%。此外,在嗜睡患者中,谵妄更为严重。在存在嗜睡的情况下,谵妄表现为睡眠-觉醒周期紊乱和语言异常。这两个特征,加上运动迟缓,使得在 RASS-1 时能够正确分类谵妄。同样的特征,加上思维异常和认知域、定向、注意力、短期和长期记忆的损害,代表谵妄的核心域,或时间发作,对谵妄非常敏感,但缺乏特异性。相反,妄想、知觉异常和情感不稳定,代表非核心域,在嗜睡患者中对谵妄非常特异,但不敏感。在没有谵妄的情况下,嗜睡导致注意力损害和语言异常。

结论

嗜睡使发生谵妄的几率增加了八倍,并导致更为严重的谵妄,其特征为睡眠-觉醒周期和语言异常。此外,嗜睡本身会导致注意力损害和语言异常,因此,其意识障碍程度低于谵妄。

相似文献

1
Delirium in the intensive care setting and the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS): Drowsiness increases the risk and is subthreshold for delirium.重症监护环境中的谵妄和 Richmond 躁动-镇静量表 (RASS):嗜睡增加了谵妄的风险,且处于亚阈值状态。
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Dec;103:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
2
Delirium in the intensive care setting dependent on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS): Inattention and visuo-spatial impairment as potential screening domains.重症监护环境下基于 Richmond 意识-镇静量表(RASS)的谵妄:注意力不集中和视空间障碍作为潜在的筛查领域。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Apr;18(2):148-157. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000683.
3
Screening for delirium with the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC): Symptom profile and utility of individual items in the identification of delirium dependent on the level of sedation.使用《重症监护谵妄筛查清单》(ICDSC)筛查谵妄:根据镇静水平,对谵妄相关症状和单个项目在识别谵妄中的作用进行评估。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Feb;17(1):74-81. doi: 10.1017/S1478951518000202. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
Comparison and agreement between the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale in evaluating patients' eligibility for delirium assessment in the ICU.比较 Richmond 躁动-镇静量表和 Riker 镇静-躁动量表在评估 ICU 患者谵妄评估资格方面的一致性。
Chest. 2012 Jul;142(1):48-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2100.
5
Detecting Delirium Superimposed on Dementia: Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale.检测叠加于痴呆症之上的谵妄:里士满躁动与镇静量表诊断性能评估
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):828-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
6
Dispersion in Scores on the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale as a Measure of Delirium in Patients with Subdural Hematomas.《作为硬膜下血肿患者谵妄评估指标的 Richmond 躁动-镇静量表评分的离散性》。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Jun;30(3):626-634. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0649-y.
7
Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).对重症监护病房患者的镇静状态进行长期监测:里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)的可靠性和有效性。
JAMA. 2003 Jun 11;289(22):2983-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2983.
8
Symptom profile as assessed on delirium rating scale-revised-98 of delirium in respiratory intensive care unit: A study from India.基于《谵妄评定量表修订版98》对呼吸重症监护病房谵妄症状的评估:一项来自印度的研究。
Lung India. 2017 Sep-Oct;34(5):434-440. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_416_14.
9
The minimal clinically important difference of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in patients with cancer with agitated delirium.癌症伴有激越性谵妄患者的 Richmond 躁动-镇静量表的最小临床重要差异。
Cancer. 2018 May 15;124(10):2246-2252. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31312. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
Informed consent in the critically ill: a two-step approach incorporating delirium screening.重症患者的知情同意:一种纳入谵妄筛查的两步法。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):94-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295308.29870.4F.

引用本文的文献

1
The Challenges of Diagnosing, Managing, and Preventing Pediatric Delirium.诊断、管理和预防儿童谵妄的挑战
Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;12(7):918. doi: 10.3390/children12070918.
2
The Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium Sedation Agitation Score in cardiac surgery.术中右美托咪定对心脏手术患者术后谵妄镇静躁动评分的影响
Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Mar 11;15(2):e156544. doi: 10.5812/aapm-156544. eCollection 2025 Apr 30.
3
Pain management of nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients admitted intensive care unit of different ages.
不同年龄段患者入住重症监护病房时纳布啡和舒芬太尼的疼痛管理。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00592-x.
4
Outcome, demography and resource utilization in ICU Patients with delirium and malignancy.ICU 中合并谵妄和恶性肿瘤的患者的结局、人口统计学特征和资源利用情况。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98200-8.
5
Delirium Screening in Neurocritical Care and Stroke Unit Patients: A Pilot Study on the Influence of Neurological Deficits on CAM-ICU and ICDSC Outcome.神经危重症和卒中单元患者的谵妄筛查:神经功能缺损对 CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 结局影响的初步研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Dec;33(3):708-717. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00938-y.
6
A hospital-wide evaluation of delirium prevalence and outcomes in acute care patients - a cohort study.医院范围内急性护理患者谵妄患病率和结局的评估-一项队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 13;18(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3345-x.
7
Rate and risk factors for a hyperactivity delirium in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者发生多动性谵妄的发生率及危险因素。
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Jun;42(2):481-488. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0990-9. Epub 2018 Jun 9.