Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital Basel, University Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 8046 Basel, Switzerland.
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Dec;103:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
Sedation is a core concept in the intensive care setting, however, the impact of sedation on delirium has not yet been studied to date.
In this prospective cohort study, 225 patients with Richmond Agitation and Sedation (RASS) scores of -1 - drowsiness and 0 - alert- and calmness were assessed with the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised 1998 (DRS-R-98) and DSM-IV-TR-determined diagnosis of delirium assessing drowsiness versus alertness.
By itself, drowsiness increased the odds for developing delirium eightfold (OR 7.88 p<0.001) and rates of delirium were 68.2 and 21.4%, respectively. Further, in the drowsy patient, delirium was more severe. In the presence of drowsiness, delirium was characterized by sleep-wake cycle disturbances and language abnormalities. These two features, in addition to psychomotor retardation, allowed the correct classification of delirium at RASS-1. The same features, in addition to thought abnormalities and the impairment in the cognitive domain, orientation, attention, short- and long-term memory representing the core domains of delirium, or the temporal onset were very sensitive towards delirium, however lacked specificity. Conversely, delusions, perceptual abnormalities and lability of affect representing the non-core domain were very specific for delirium in the drowsy, however, not very sensitive. In the absence of delirium, drowsiness caused attentional impairment and language abnormalities.
Drowsiness increased the odds for developing delirium eightfold and caused more severe delirium, which was characterized by sleep-wake cycle and language abnormalities. Further, drowsiness by itself caused attentional impairment and language abnormalities, thus, with its disturbance in consciousness was subthreshold for delirium.
镇静是重症监护环境中的核心概念,然而,镇静对谵妄的影响尚未得到研究。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,对 225 名 Richmond 镇静躁动评分(RASS)为-1 (嗜睡)和 0 (警觉和镇静)的患者进行了评估,使用谵妄评定量表修订版 1998 版(DRS-R-98)和 DSM-IV-TR 确定的谵妄诊断评估嗜睡与警觉。
单独的嗜睡使发生谵妄的几率增加了八倍(OR 7.88,p<0.001),谵妄发生率分别为 68.2%和 21.4%。此外,在嗜睡患者中,谵妄更为严重。在存在嗜睡的情况下,谵妄表现为睡眠-觉醒周期紊乱和语言异常。这两个特征,加上运动迟缓,使得在 RASS-1 时能够正确分类谵妄。同样的特征,加上思维异常和认知域、定向、注意力、短期和长期记忆的损害,代表谵妄的核心域,或时间发作,对谵妄非常敏感,但缺乏特异性。相反,妄想、知觉异常和情感不稳定,代表非核心域,在嗜睡患者中对谵妄非常特异,但不敏感。在没有谵妄的情况下,嗜睡导致注意力损害和语言异常。
嗜睡使发生谵妄的几率增加了八倍,并导致更为严重的谵妄,其特征为睡眠-觉醒周期和语言异常。此外,嗜睡本身会导致注意力损害和语言异常,因此,其意识障碍程度低于谵妄。