Suppr超能文献

在全国肺癌筛查试验中,烟草依赖预示着更高的肺癌和死亡率以及更低的戒烟率。

Tobacco Dependence Predicts Higher Lung Cancer and Mortality Rates and Lower Rates of Smoking Cessation in the National Lung Screening Trial.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

出版信息

Chest. 2018 Jul;154(1):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incorporating tobacco treatment within lung cancer screening programs has the potential to influence cessation in high-risk smokers. We aimed to better understand the characteristics of smokers within a screening cohort, correlate those variables with downstream outcomes, and identify predictors of continued smoking.

METHODS

This study is a secondary analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial randomized clinical study. Tobacco dependence was evaluated by using the Fagerstrӧm Test for Nicotine Dependence, the Heaviness of Smoking Index, and time to first cigarette (TTFC); descriptive statistics were performed. Clinical outcomes (smoking cessation, lung cancer, and mortality) were assessed with descriptive statistics and χ tests stratified according to nicotine dependence. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to study the influence of dependence on smoking cessation and mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients with high dependence scores were less likely to quit smoking compared with low dependence smokers (TTFC OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.42-0.60]). Indicators of high dependence, as measured according to all three metrics, were associated with worsening clinical outcomes. TTFC showed that patients who smoked within 5 min of waking (indicating higher dependence) had higher rates of lung cancer (2.07% for > 60 min after waking vs 5.92% ≤ 5 min after waking; hazard ratio [HR], 2.56 [95% CI, 1.49-4.41]), all-cause mortality (5.38% for > 60 min vs 11.21% ≤ 5 min; HR, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.55-3.09]), and lung cancer-specific mortality (0.55% for > 60 min vs 2.92% for ≤ 5 min; HR, 4.46 [95% CI, 1.63-12.21]).

CONCLUSIONS

Using TTFC, a one-question assessment of tobacco dependence, at the time of lung cancer screening has implications for personalizing tobacco treatment and improving risk assessment.

摘要

背景

在肺癌筛查项目中纳入烟草治疗有可能影响高危吸烟者的戒烟。我们旨在更好地了解筛查队列中吸烟者的特征,将这些变量与下游结果相关联,并确定继续吸烟的预测因素。

方法

本研究是国家肺癌筛查试验随机临床试验的二次分析。使用 Fagerstrӧm 尼古丁依赖测试、吸烟严重程度指数和首次吸烟时间 (TTFC) 评估烟草依赖;进行描述性统计。根据尼古丁依赖程度进行分层,采用描述性统计和 χ 检验评估临床结局(戒烟、肺癌和死亡率)。使用逻辑和 Cox 回归模型分别研究依赖对戒烟和死亡率的影响。

结果

与低依赖吸烟者相比,高依赖评分的患者更不可能戒烟(TTFC OR,0.50 [95% CI,0.42-0.60])。根据所有三种指标测量的高依赖指标与临床结局恶化相关。TTFC 表明,醒来后 5 分钟内吸烟(表明依赖性较高)的患者肺癌发生率更高(醒来后 > 60 分钟为 2.07%,醒来后 ≤ 5 分钟为 5.92%;风险比 [HR],2.56 [95% CI,1.49-4.41]),全因死亡率(醒来后 > 60 分钟为 5.38%,醒来后 ≤ 5 分钟为 11.21%;HR,2.19 [95% CI,1.55-3.09])和肺癌特异性死亡率(醒来后 > 60 分钟为 0.55%,醒来后 ≤ 5 分钟为 2.92%;HR,4.46 [95% CI,1.63-12.21])。

结论

在肺癌筛查时使用 TTFC(一种评估烟草依赖的单问题评估)对个性化烟草治疗和改善风险评估具有重要意义。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Neighborhood-level deprivation and survival in lung cancer.社区剥夺程度与肺癌生存率。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):959. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12720-w.
10
The Impact of Older Age on Smoking Cessation Outcomes After Standard Advice to Quit.年龄对标准戒烟建议后戒烟效果的影响。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Jul;42(7):1477-1485. doi: 10.1177/07334648231158228. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验