Suppr超能文献

使用集中式交付策略的新型结直肠癌决策辅助工具的实施与评估

Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Colorectal Cancer Decision Aid Using a Centralized Delivery Strategy.

作者信息

Tate Channing E, Matlock Daniel D, Dalton Alexandra F, Schilling Lisa M, Marcus Alexandra, Schommer Tiffany, Lyon Corey, Lewis Carmen L

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jun;44(6):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.11.009. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States; however, CRC screening reduces both incidence and mortality rates. Patient decision aids (DAs) are an evidence-based strategy to support patients making health-related decisions. CRC screening DAs can be unsuccessful due to provider preferences for colonoscopy and lack of effective DA implementation strategies within clinical settings.

METHODS

A hybrid implementation-effectiveness study was conducted testing the feasibility of using an existing centralized preventive health screening outreach infrastructure to implement a novel CRC DA across a health care system. Participants included primary care patients at one of three study clinics. Implementation was assessed by determining whether patients remembered receiving the DA and were aware of CRC screening options. Effectiveness was measured by comparing overall screening rates between the control and intervention groups.

RESULTS

Using a centralized delivery system was a feasible and efficient method for implementing DAs to a large academic health system. More than 90% of the intervention group remembered receiving the DA, and 80% found it helpful in their decision-making process. The DA was successful in improving CRC screening knowledge; however, overall CRC screening rates significantly decreased between the control and intervention periods (50.8% vs. 39.2%, respectively; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Centralized delivery is a feasible method for DA implementation. Although DAs increase knowledge, the true effectiveness of CRC DAs in clinical settings is unknown, as a result of the number in screening tests, diversity in DA format, and the variability in dissemination and implementation practices.

摘要

背景

在美国,结直肠癌(CRC)是癌症相关死亡的第二大主要原因;然而,CRC筛查可降低发病率和死亡率。患者决策辅助工具(DAs)是一种基于证据的策略,用于支持患者做出与健康相关的决策。由于临床医生对结肠镜检查的偏好以及临床环境中缺乏有效的DA实施策略,CRC筛查DAs可能并不成功。

方法

开展了一项混合实施-效果研究,测试利用现有的集中式预防性健康筛查推广基础设施在整个医疗系统中实施一种新型CRC DA的可行性。参与者包括三个研究诊所之一的初级保健患者。通过确定患者是否记得收到DA并了解CRC筛查选项来评估实施情况。通过比较对照组和干预组的总体筛查率来衡量效果。

结果

使用集中式交付系统是向大型学术医疗系统实施DAs的一种可行且有效的方法。超过90%的干预组患者记得收到了DA,80%的患者认为它对其决策过程有帮助。该DA成功提高了CRC筛查知识;然而,对照组和干预期之间的总体CRC筛查率显著下降(分别为50.8%和39.2%;p = 0.03)。

结论

集中式交付是实施DA的一种可行方法。尽管DAs增加了知识,但由于筛查测试的数量、DA格式的多样性以及传播和实施实践的变异性,CRC DAs在临床环境中的真正效果尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Colorectal Cancer Decision Aid Using a Centralized Delivery Strategy.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Jun;44(6):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.11.009. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
5
Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 10;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6.
9
Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys.
Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Sep;23(9):1541-8. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0031-x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
2
Adherence to Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 3 Years.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):105-14. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.367. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
4
Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar;29(3):507-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2701-0. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
5
Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use--United States, 2012.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Nov 8;62(44):881-8.
6
Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
8
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 9;172(7):575-82. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332.
9
Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jun;21(6):895-904. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0192. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验