Suppr超能文献

基于胃左静脉的无创性食管静脉曲张检测:同一天内门静脉血流动力学评估与内镜表现的比较。

Left gastric vein-based noninvasive test for esophageal varices: a same-day comparison of portal hemodynamic assessment with endoscopic appearance.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, 260-8670, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018 May 25;9(5):154. doi: 10.1038/s41424-018-0021-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of hemodynamic assessment of the left gastric vein (LGV) as a noninvasive test to diagnose esophageal varices (EV) in cirrhosis patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study consisted of 229 cirrhosis patients (62.7 ± 11.8 years; Child-Pugh score 5-14). One hundred fifty-four patients had EV (67.2%; small, 53; medium, 71; large, 30). All patients underwent a blood test and Doppler ultrasound followed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy on the same day. The diagnostic ability for EV was compared between LGV-related findings and the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (Plt/Spl).

RESULTS

The detectability of the LGV was higher in patients with EV (129/144, 89.6%) than in those without (35/75, 46.7%; p < 0.0001), and was higher in those with large EV (30/30, 100%) than in those without (134/199, 67.3%; p = 0.0002). The positive detection of the LGV showed 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) to identify large EV in the whole cohort and compensated group (n = 127). The best cutoff value in the LGV diameter was 5.35 mm to identify large EV, showing 0.753 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 90% sensitivity and 96.5% NPV. The Plt/Spl showed 62.1% sensitivity and 87.1% NPV, and the best cutoff value was 442.9 to identify large EV with 0.658 AUROC, which was comparable to LGV-based assessment (p = 0.162).

CONCLUSIONS

This same-day comparison study demonstrated the value of LGV-based noninvasive test to identify large EV with high sensitivity and NPV in cirrhosis patients at a lower cost.

摘要

目的

研究胃左静脉(LGV)血流动力学评估作为一种非侵入性检测方法,用于诊断肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张(EV)的效果。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 229 例肝硬化患者(62.7±11.8 岁;Child-Pugh 评分 5-14 分)。其中 154 例患者存在 EV(67.2%;小 53 例,中 71 例,大 30 例)。所有患者均在同一天进行血液检查和多普勒超声检查,随后进行上消化道内镜检查。比较 LGV 相关指标与血小板计数/脾直径比(Plt/Spl)对 EV 的诊断能力。

结果

EV 患者 LGV 的检出率(129/144,89.6%)高于无 EV 患者(35/75,46.7%;p<0.0001),且 LGV 直径较大的患者(30/30,100%)高于 LGV 直径较小的患者(134/199,67.3%;p=0.0002)。在整个队列和代偿组(n=127)中,LGV 阳性检测对大 EV 的诊断具有 100%的敏感性和阴性预测值(NPV)。LGV 直径的最佳截断值为 5.35mm 时,对大 EV 的诊断具有 0.753 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC),灵敏度为 90%,NPV 为 96.5%。Plt/Spl 的灵敏度为 62.1%,NPV 为 87.1%,最佳截断值为 442.9 时,对大 EV 的诊断具有 0.658 的 AUROC,与 LGV 为基础的评估相当(p=0.162)。

结论

本同日比较研究表明,LGV 为基础的非侵入性检测在肝硬化患者中具有较高的敏感性和 NPV,可用于诊断大 EV,成本更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验