Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Int J Med Sci. 2019 Nov 9;16(12):1614-1620. doi: 10.7150/ijms.37040. eCollection 2019.
To examine the incidence of cirrhosis patients with high-risk esophageal varices (EV) who show hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) < 10 mmHg and to identify their hemodynamic features. This prospective study consisted of 110 cirrhosis patients with EV, all with the candidate for primary or secondary prophylaxis. Sixty-one patients had red sign, and 49 patients were bleeders. All patients underwent both Doppler ultrasound and HVPG measurement. There were 18 patients (16.4%) with HVPG < 10 mmHg. The presence of venous-venous communication (VVC) was more frequent in patients with HVPG < 10 mmHg (10/18) than in those with HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg (19/92; p = 0.0021). The flow volume in the left gastric vein (LGV) and the incidence of red sign were higher in the former (251.9 ± 150.6 mL/min; 16/18) than in the latter (181 ± 100.5 mL/min, p = 0.02; 45/92; p = 0.0018). The patients with red sign had lower HVPG (13.3 ± 4.5) but advanced LGV hemodynamics (velocity 13.2 ± 3.8 cm/s; flow volume 217.5 ± 126.6 mL/min), whereas those without red sign had higher HVPG (16.2 ± 4.6, p = 0.001) but poorer LGV hemodynamics (10.9 ± 2.3, p = 0.002; 160.1 ± 83.1, p = 0.02). Patients with high-risk EV with HVPG < 10 mmHg showed 16.4% incidence. Although low HVPG may be underestimated by the presence of VVC, the increased LGV hemodynamics compensates for the severity of portal hypertension, which may contribute to the development of red sign.
研究肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)<10mmHg 的肝硬化高危食管静脉曲张(EV)患者的发生率,并确定其血流动力学特征。
这是一项前瞻性研究,共纳入 110 例 EV 肝硬化患者,所有患者均有原发性或继发性预防的适应证。61 例患者有红色征,49 例患者为出血者。所有患者均行多普勒超声和 HVPG 测量。有 18 例(16.4%)患者的 HVPG<10mmHg。HVPG<10mmHg 的患者静脉-静脉交通(VVC)的发生率高于 HVPG≥10mmHg 的患者(10/18 比 19/92;p=0.0021)。前者的胃左静脉(LGV)流量和红色征发生率更高(251.9±150.6mL/min;16/18),而后者的 LGV 流量和红色征发生率更低(181±100.5mL/min,p=0.02;45/92;p=0.0018)。有红色征的患者 HVPG 较低(13.3±4.5),但 LGV 血流动力学较差(速度 13.2±3.8cm/s;流量 217.5±126.6mL/min),而无红色征的患者 HVPG 较高(16.2±4.6,p=0.001),但 LGV 血流动力学较差(10.9±2.3,p=0.002;160.1±83.1,p=0.02)。
高危 EV 合并 HVPG<10mmHg 的患者发生率为 16.4%。尽管 VVC 可能使 HVPG 低估,但增加的 LGV 血流动力学可补偿门静脉高压的严重程度,这可能有助于红色征的发展。