Prentice Donna M, Sona Carrie, Wessman Brian T, Ablordeppey Enyo A, Isakow Warren, Arroyo Cassandra, Schallom Marilyn
1Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
2Department of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 May;19(2):122-126. doi: 10.1177/1751143717740805. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
Intensive care unit patients are at risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Earlier removal of catheters may be possible with accurate measurement of bladder volume. The purpose was to compare measured bladder volumes with bedside ultrasound, bladder scanner, and urine volume.
Prospective correlational descriptive study.
Surgical/trauma intensive care unit and medical intensive care unit.
Renal dialysis patients with less than 100 ml of urine in 24 h prior to urinary catheter removal and patients with suspected catheter obstruction.
A physician trained in ultrasound and an advanced practice registered nurse trained in bladder scanning measured bladder volume; each blinded to the other's measurement. Device used first (ultrasound or bladder scanner) alternated daily. The intensive care unit team determined need for intermittent catheterization or treatment for suspected obstruction. Fifty-one measurements from 13 patients were obtained with results reported in milliliters. Ultrasound measurements were a mean volume of 72.1 ± 127 (range: 1.7-666) and the bladder scanner measurements were 117 ± 131 (0-529). On six occasions in five dialysis patients, urine volume measurement was available. The mean difference in ultrasound-urine volume mean difference was 0.5 ± 37.8 (range: -68 to 38.2) and the bladder scanner-urine volume was 132 ± 167 (-72 to 397). Two patients with suspected catheter obstructions had ultrasound, bladder scanner, urine volume measurements, respectively: (1) 539, 51, >300 (began voiding before catheter replaced); (2) 666, 68, 1000 with catheter replacement. Conditions leading to greatest differences were obesity, indwelling catheter and ascites.
These results demonstrate the inaccuracy of the bladder scanner. Ultrasound measurements appear more accurate. To remove urinary catheters in patients with minimal to low urine output, serial ultrasound measurements can be used to monitor bladder volumes and return of renal function.
重症监护病房患者存在导尿管相关尿路感染的风险。通过准确测量膀胱容量,可能更早拔除导尿管。本研究旨在比较床边超声、膀胱扫描仪测量的膀胱容量与尿量。
前瞻性相关性描述性研究。
外科/创伤重症监护病房和内科重症监护病房。
拔除导尿管前24小时尿量少于100毫升的肾透析患者以及疑似导尿管梗阻的患者。
一名接受过超声培训的医生和一名接受过膀胱扫描培训的高级执业注册护士测量膀胱容量;两人均对对方的测量结果不知情。每天交替使用超声或膀胱扫描仪。重症监护病房团队确定是否需要间歇性导尿或对疑似梗阻进行治疗。共获得13例患者的51次测量结果,结果以毫升为单位报告。超声测量的平均容量为72.1±127(范围:1.7 - 666),膀胱扫描仪测量的平均容量为117±131(0 - 529)。5例透析患者有6次可获得尿量测量值。超声测量尿量的平均差值为0.5±37.8(范围:-68至38.2),膀胱扫描仪测量尿量的平均差值为132±167(-72至397)。两名疑似导尿管梗阻的患者分别进行了超声、膀胱扫描仪和尿量测量:(1)539、51、>300(在更换导尿管前开始排尿);(2)666、68、1000(更换导尿管)。导致差异最大的情况是肥胖、留置导尿管和腹水。
这些结果表明膀胱扫描仪测量不准确。超声测量似乎更准确。对于尿量极少至低尿量的患者,可采用连续超声测量来监测膀胱容量和肾功能恢复情况,以拔除导尿管。