Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房中床边超声与膀胱扫描测量膀胱容量的差异:一项初步研究。

Discrepancies in measuring bladder volumes with bedside ultrasound and bladder scanning in the intensive care unit: A pilot study.

作者信息

Prentice Donna M, Sona Carrie, Wessman Brian T, Ablordeppey Enyo A, Isakow Warren, Arroyo Cassandra, Schallom Marilyn

机构信息

1Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.

2Department of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 May;19(2):122-126. doi: 10.1177/1751143717740805. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Intensive care unit patients are at risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Earlier removal of catheters may be possible with accurate measurement of bladder volume. The purpose was to compare measured bladder volumes with bedside ultrasound, bladder scanner, and urine volume.

DESIGN

Prospective correlational descriptive study.

SETTING

Surgical/trauma intensive care unit and medical intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Renal dialysis patients with less than 100 ml of urine in 24 h prior to urinary catheter removal and patients with suspected catheter obstruction.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A physician trained in ultrasound and an advanced practice registered nurse trained in bladder scanning measured bladder volume; each blinded to the other's measurement. Device used first (ultrasound or bladder scanner) alternated daily. The intensive care unit team determined need for intermittent catheterization or treatment for suspected obstruction. Fifty-one measurements from 13 patients were obtained with results reported in milliliters. Ultrasound measurements were a mean volume of 72.1 ± 127 (range: 1.7-666) and the bladder scanner measurements were 117 ± 131 (0-529). On six occasions in five dialysis patients, urine volume measurement was available. The mean difference in ultrasound-urine volume mean difference was 0.5 ± 37.8 (range: -68 to 38.2) and the bladder scanner-urine volume was 132 ± 167 (-72 to 397). Two patients with suspected catheter obstructions had ultrasound, bladder scanner, urine volume measurements, respectively: (1) 539, 51, >300 (began voiding before catheter replaced); (2) 666, 68, 1000 with catheter replacement. Conditions leading to greatest differences were obesity, indwelling catheter and ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the inaccuracy of the bladder scanner. Ultrasound measurements appear more accurate. To remove urinary catheters in patients with minimal to low urine output, serial ultrasound measurements can be used to monitor bladder volumes and return of renal function.

摘要

目的

重症监护病房患者存在导尿管相关尿路感染的风险。通过准确测量膀胱容量,可能更早拔除导尿管。本研究旨在比较床边超声、膀胱扫描仪测量的膀胱容量与尿量。

设计

前瞻性相关性描述性研究。

地点

外科/创伤重症监护病房和内科重症监护病房。

患者

拔除导尿管前24小时尿量少于100毫升的肾透析患者以及疑似导尿管梗阻的患者。

测量与主要结果

一名接受过超声培训的医生和一名接受过膀胱扫描培训的高级执业注册护士测量膀胱容量;两人均对对方的测量结果不知情。每天交替使用超声或膀胱扫描仪。重症监护病房团队确定是否需要间歇性导尿或对疑似梗阻进行治疗。共获得13例患者的51次测量结果,结果以毫升为单位报告。超声测量的平均容量为72.1±127(范围:1.7 - 666),膀胱扫描仪测量的平均容量为117±131(0 - 529)。5例透析患者有6次可获得尿量测量值。超声测量尿量的平均差值为0.5±37.8(范围:-68至38.2),膀胱扫描仪测量尿量的平均差值为132±167(-72至397)。两名疑似导尿管梗阻的患者分别进行了超声、膀胱扫描仪和尿量测量:(1)539、51、>300(在更换导尿管前开始排尿);(2)666、68、1000(更换导尿管)。导致差异最大的情况是肥胖、留置导尿管和腹水。

结论

这些结果表明膀胱扫描仪测量不准确。超声测量似乎更准确。对于尿量极少至低尿量的患者,可采用连续超声测量来监测膀胱容量和肾功能恢复情况,以拔除导尿管。

相似文献

5
Detecting postoperative urinary retention with an ultrasound scanner.使用超声扫描仪检测术后尿潴留。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Mar;46(3):279-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.t01-1-460309.x.
8

引用本文的文献

5
False Elevation of Volume Determined by Bladder Scanner Secondary to Bowel Obstruction.肠梗阻继发膀胱扫描仪测定的容积假性升高
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 24;4(2):158-160. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2019.12.45103. eCollection 2020 May.
6
The TIE fighter sign on point of care ultrasonography.即时超声检查中的TIE战斗机征。
CEN Case Rep. 2020 Feb;9(1):91-93. doi: 10.1007/s13730-019-00428-x. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验