• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of the effectiveness of midazolam and diazepam in lipid emulsion as sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

作者信息

Bullimore D W, Mulley B A, Cooke P, Miloszewski K J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, St James's Hospital, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1987 Oct;1(5):409-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1987.tb00641.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.1987.tb00641.x
PMID:2979684
Abstract

In a study of 101 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 90% of patients had complete amnesia for the procedure after intravenous midazolam (average dose 10 mg), but only 61% had complete amnesia after intravenous diazepam in lipid emulsion (average dose 18.4 mg) (P = 0.0006). However, when assessed by two different tests, recovery within the first hour was significantly more rapid after diazepam (P less than 0.0001). Prolonged sedation (over 20 hours after injection) was reported occasionally by patients who had received either drug. Thus, as with patients who have been sedated with diazepam, those who have been sedated with midazolam should also be advised to avoid driving or operating machinery for at least 24 hours after injection.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effectiveness of midazolam and diazepam in lipid emulsion as sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1987 Oct;1(5):409-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1987.tb00641.x.
2
Midazolam versus diazepam for combined esophogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.咪达唑仑与地西泮用于食管胃十二指肠镜检查和结肠镜检查联合操作的比较
Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Aug;34(8):1265-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01537276.
3
Sedation for endoscopy: midazolam or diazepam and pethidine?内镜检查的镇静:咪达唑仑或地西泮与哌替啶?
Br J Anaesth. 1988 Dec;61(6):698-701. doi: 10.1093/bja/61.6.698.
4
A comparison of oral diazepam versus midazolam, administered with intravenous meperidine, as premedication to sedation for pediatric endoscopy.口服地西泮与咪达唑仑联合静脉注射哌替啶作为小儿内镜检查镇静术前用药的比较。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002 Jul;35(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200207000-00012.
5
The effect of sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.上消化道内镜检查时的镇静效果。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct-Dec;16(4):280-4. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.70616.
6
Midazolam-induced sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: assessment of endoscopist and patient satisfaction.咪达唑仑用于上消化道内镜检查的镇静:内镜医师和患者满意度评估。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2003 Jul-Aug;26(4):164-7. doi: 10.1097/00001610-200307000-00007.
7
A randomized comparison of midazolam and diazepam injectable emulsion in cataract surgery.
Can J Anaesth. 1990 Jul;37(5):528-33. doi: 10.1007/BF03006320.
8
A randomized comparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Nov;55(11):1095-101. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.11.1095.
9
The effect of age on the relative potency of midazolam and diazepam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990 Apr;12(2):145-7. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199004000-00006.
10
Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparison of alfentanil-midazolam and meperidine-diazepam.
Can J Anaesth. 1994 Dec;41(12):1161-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03020654.

引用本文的文献

1
Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparison of alfentanil-midazolam and meperidine-diazepam.
Can J Anaesth. 1994 Dec;41(12):1161-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03020654.
2
A comparison of diazepam and midazolam as endoscopy premedication assessing changes in ventilation and oxygen saturation.地西泮和咪达唑仑作为内镜检查术前用药的比较:评估通气和血氧饱和度的变化
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Nov;26(5):595-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb05300.x.