Sydney Medical School - Northern, University of Sydney & Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Department of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Center for Health and Medical Psychology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9784-8.
Purpose (1) to examine the ability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire-short version (ÖMPSQ-SF) to predict time to return to pre-injury work duties (PID) following a work-related soft tissue injury (regardless of body location); and (2) to examine the appropriateness of 50/100 as a suitable cut-off score for case identification. Methods Injured workers (IW) from six public hospitals in Sydney, Australia, who had taken medically-sanctioned time off work due to their injury, were recruited by insurance case managers within 5-15 days of their injury. Eligible participants (N = 213 in total) were administered the ÖMPSQ-SF over the telephone by the case manager. For objective (1) Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to predict days to return to PID using the ÖMPSQ-SF. For objective (2) receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the ÖMPSQ-SF total score that optimises sensitivity and specificity in detecting whether or not participants had returned to PID within 2-7 weeks. Results The total ÖMPSQ-SF score significantly predicted number of days to return to PID, such that for every 1-point increase in the total ÖMPSQ-SF score the predicted chance of returning to work reduced by 4% (i.e., hazard ratio = 0.96), p < 0.001. Sensitivity and specificity for the ROC analysis comparing ÖMPSQ-SF total score to return to PID within 2-7 weeks suggested 48 as the optimal cut off (sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.79). Conclusion The results provide strong support for the use of the ÖMPSQ-SF in an applied setting for identifying those IW likely to have delayed RTW when administered within 15 days of the injury. While a score of 48/100 was the optimal cut point for sensitivity and specificity, pragmatically, 50/100 should be acceptable as a cut-off in future studies of this type.
目的 (1) 检验 Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷-短版 (ÖMPSQ-SF) 预测与工作相关的软组织损伤后返回受伤前工作职责 (PID) 时间的能力(无论身体部位如何);(2)检验 50/100 作为病例识别合适截断值的适宜性。方法 澳大利亚悉尼六家公立医院的受伤工人 (IW) 在受伤后因受伤获得医疗批准的休假时间,由保险案件经理在受伤后 5-15 天内通过电话招募。合格的参与者(总共 213 人)由案件经理通过电话管理 ÖMPSQ-SF。对于目标 (1),使用 Cox 比例风险回归分析预测使用 ÖMPSQ-SF 返回 PID 的天数。对于目标 (2),使用接收者操作特征 (ROC) 分析确定 ÖMPSQ-SF 总分,以优化在 2-7 周内检测参与者是否返回 PID 的敏感性和特异性。结果 ÖMPSQ-SF 总分显著预测返回 PID 的天数,即 ÖMPSQ-SF 总分每增加 1 分,返回工作的预测机会就会降低 4%(即风险比 = 0.96),p < 0.001。ROC 分析比较 ÖMPSQ-SF 总分与 2-7 周内返回 PID 的敏感性和特异性表明,48 是最佳截断值(敏感性= 0.65,特异性= 0.79)。结论 这些结果为在受伤后 15 天内使用 ÖMPSQ-SF 识别可能延迟 RTW 的 IW 提供了强有力的支持。虽然 48/100 是敏感性和特异性的最佳截断点,但在这种类型的未来研究中,50/100 作为截断值应该是可以接受的。