Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, University of Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
INSERM U1219, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1049-1058. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0686-7.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with a dose and duration-dependent coronary risk. There is little information concerning analgesic-dose ibuprofen, among the most widely used drugs worldwide.
Our objective was to measure the risks of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after dispensing of ibuprofen, versus paracetamol.
Propensity score 1:2-matched cohorts of ibuprofen or paracetamol treatment episodes (TEs) in Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires (EGB), the 1/97 sample of Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS), the French nationwide claims database, from 2009 to 2014, were compared. Outcomes were hospital admissions for ACS during the 3 months after the dispensing of ibuprofen or paracetamol. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated overall and stratified on low-dose aspirin dispensing.
A total of 315,269 ibuprofen TEs in 168,400 persons were matched to 630,457 paracetamol TEs in 395,952 patients. Event rates were 50-100 times higher in low-dose aspirin users (27 vs 0.28 per 1000 patient years). Overall there was no difference in risk of ACS at 3 months (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.20) despite a transient increase in the first 2 weeks in ibuprofen users (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11-2.59). In the stratified analysis, this short-term risk was only found in aspirin users (5% of population, HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.24-3.24), but not in non-aspirin users (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.40-2.94).
There was no evidence for an increased risk of ACS in patients dispensed ibuprofen compared to paracetamol.
非甾体抗炎药与剂量和时间相关的冠状动脉风险有关。关于全球应用最广泛的药物之一——镇痛剂量的布洛芬,相关信息很少。
我们的目的是测量与扑热息痛相比,开具布洛芬后的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)风险。
2009 年至 2014 年,在法国全国性索赔数据库——Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires(EGB)和 Système National des Données de Santé(SNDS)的 1/97 样本中,对倾向评分 1:2 匹配的布洛芬或扑热息痛治疗期(TE)队列进行比较。结果是在开具布洛芬或扑热息痛后的 3 个月内因 ACS 住院的情况。总体计算和低剂量阿司匹林给药分层的危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
共匹配了 168400 人开具的 315269 次布洛芬 TE 和 395952 名患者的 630457 次扑热息痛 TE。低剂量阿司匹林使用者的事件发生率高 50-100 倍(27 与 0.28/1000 患者年)。尽管布洛芬使用者在头 2 周内风险短暂增加(HR 1.70,95%CI 1.11-2.59),但在 3 个月时,ACS 风险无差异(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.74-1.20)。在分层分析中,这种短期风险仅见于阿司匹林使用者(人群中的 5%,HR 1.84,95%CI 1.24-3.24),而非阿司匹林使用者则没有(HR 1.09,95%CI 0.40-2.94)。
与扑热息痛相比,开具布洛芬的患者发生 ACS 的风险没有增加的证据。