Suppr超能文献

分娩特定患者报告结局测量指标概念框架的构建与初步条目库

The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Preliminary Item Bank for Childbirth-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

机构信息

Childbirth Research Associates, LLC, Los Angeles, CA.

AMF Consulting, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3373-3399. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12856. Epub 2018 May 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a conceptual framework and preliminary item bank for childbirth-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains.

DATA SOURCES

Women, who were U.S. residents, ≥18 years old, and ≥20 weeks pregnant, were surveyed regarding their childbirth values and preferences (V&P) using online panels.

STUDY DESIGN

Using community-based research techniques and Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System (PROMIS ) methodology, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify self-reported survey items regarding patient-reported V&P and childbirth experiences and outcomes (PROs). The V&P/PRO domains were validated by focus groups. We conducted a cross-sectional observational study and fitted a multivariable logistic regression model to each V&P item to describe "who" wanted each item.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We identified 5,880 V&P/PRO items that mapped to 19 domains and 58 subdomains. We present results for the 2,250 survey respondents who anticipated a vaginal delivery in a hospital. Wide variation existed regarding each V&P item, and personal characteristics, such as maternal confidence and ability to cope well with pain, were frequent predictors in the models. The resulting preliminary item bank consisted of 60 key personal characteristics and 63 V&P/PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

The conceptual framework and preliminary (PROMIS ) item bank presented here provide a foundation for the development of childbirth-specific V&P/PROs.

摘要

目的

开发一个针对分娩特定患者报告结局(PRO)领域的概念框架和初步条目库。

数据来源

通过在线小组调查,对居住在美国、年龄≥18 岁且怀孕≥20 周的女性进行了关于其分娩价值观和偏好(V&P)的调查。

研究设计

使用基于社区的研究技术和患者报告结局管理信息系统(PROMIS)方法,我们进行了全面的文献回顾,以确定关于患者报告的 V&P 和分娩经历和结局(PROs)的自我报告调查项目。V&P/PRO 领域通过焦点小组进行了验证。我们进行了一项横断面观察性研究,并对每个 V&P 项目进行了多变量逻辑回归模型拟合,以描述“谁”想要每个项目。

主要发现

我们确定了 5880 个 V&P/PRO 项目,这些项目映射到 19 个领域和 58 个子领域。我们展示了预期在医院进行阴道分娩的 2250 名调查受访者的结果。每个 V&P 项目之间存在很大差异,个人特征,如母亲的信心和应对疼痛的能力,在模型中经常是预测因素。由此产生的初步条目库由 60 个关键个人特征和 63 个 V&P/PROs 组成。

结论

本文提出的概念框架和初步(PROMIS)条目库为开发分娩特定的 V&P/PRO 提供了基础。

相似文献

1
The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Preliminary Item Bank for Childbirth-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3373-3399. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12856. Epub 2018 May 24.
2
3
Childbirth-specific patient-reported outcomes as predictors of hospital satisfaction.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;220(2):201.e1-201.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.093. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
4
Childbirth Fear: Relation to Birth and Care Provider Preferences.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):58-67. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12675. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Variation in childbirth services in California: a cross-sectional survey of childbirth hospitals.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):523.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
10
Use of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life Instrument.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct 1;143(10):975-982. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1182.

引用本文的文献

2
The Childbirth Experience Survey (CBEX): An Analysis of Qualitative Survey data.
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Apr;29(4):457-464. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04043-4. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
The Relationship Between Mental Health Literacy, Overall Adaptation and Mental Health of University Freshers [Letter].
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Dec 21;16:5139-5140. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S454768. eCollection 2023.
5
Capacity-Building for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences (PRO) Data Across Hospitals.
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Sep;27(9):1460-1471. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03720-6. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Person-Centered Maternity Care and Health Outcomes at 1 and 6 Months Postpartum.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Oct;31(10):1411-1421. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0643. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Birth Plans: What Matters for Birth Experience Satisfaction.
Birth. 2016 Jun;43(2):144-50. doi: 10.1111/birt.12226. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
2
Births: Final Data for 2014.
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Dec;64(12):1-64.
3
Obstetric Care Consensus No. 2: Levels of maternal care.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;125(2):502-515. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000460770.99574.9f.
5
Monitoring childbirth morbidity using hospital discharge data: further development and application of a composite measure.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;211(3):268.e1-268.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
6
Patient reports of the outcomes of treatment: a structured review of approaches.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jan 14;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-5.
7
Trends in maternal morbidity before and during pregnancy in California.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S49-57. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301583. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
8
Development of an online library of patient-reported outcome measures in gastroenterology: the GI-PRO database.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):234-48. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.401. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
9
Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity: a multistate analysis, 2008-2010.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;210(5):435.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.039. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验