• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以人为中心的产妇护理与产后 1 个月和 6 个月的健康结果。

Person-Centered Maternity Care and Health Outcomes at 1 and 6 Months Postpartum.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.

Cooley Dickinson ObGyn and Midwifery, Cooley Dickinson Medical Group, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Oct;31(10):1411-1421. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0643. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2021.0643
PMID:36067084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9618378/
Abstract

Person-centered care has been increasingly recognized as an important aspect of health care quality, including in maternity care. Little is known about correlates and outcomes of person-centered care in maternity care in the United States. Data were from a prospective cohort of more than 3000 individuals who gave birth to a first baby in a Pennsylvania hospital. Person-centered maternity care was measured a 13-item rating scale administered 1-month postpartum. Content validity was established through exploratory factor analysis. The resulting scale had scores ranging from 13 to 54, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.86. Using linear and logistic regression models to control for covariates, we examined associations between participants' characteristics and person-centered maternity care and between person-centered maternity care and postpartum outcomes. Participants had a mean total score of 47.80 on the person-centered maternity care scale. Patient factors independently associated with more person-centered maternity care included older age, more positive attitude toward vaginal birth during pregnancy, and spontaneous vaginal birth. In adjusted models, higher person-centered maternity scale scores were strongly associated with many positive physical and mental health outcomes at 1 and 6 months postpartum. Our findings underscore the importance of person-centered maternity not just due to its intrinsic value but also because it may be associated with both mental and physical health outcomes through the postpartum period. Results suggest that policy efforts are necessary to ensure person-centered maternity care, especially for delivery hospitalization experience.

摘要

人本护理越来越被视为医疗质量的一个重要方面,包括在产科护理中。在美国,关于人本护理与产科护理的相关性和结果的了解甚少。

本研究的数据来自宾夕法尼亚州一家医院的 3000 多名初产妇的前瞻性队列研究。人本护理通过产后 1 个月的 13 项评分量表进行测量。通过探索性因子分析确定内容效度。该量表的评分范围为 13 至 54 分,克朗巴赫系数为 0.86。我们使用线性和逻辑回归模型来控制协变量,研究了参与者特征与人本护理的关系以及人本护理与产后结果的关系。

参与者在人本护理量表上的平均总分为 47.80 分。与更人本化的产科护理独立相关的患者因素包括年龄较大、怀孕期间对阴道分娩更积极的态度以及自然阴道分娩。在调整后的模型中,人本护理量表得分较高与产后 1 个月和 6 个月时许多身体和心理健康结果呈强相关。

我们的研究结果强调了人本护理的重要性,不仅因为其内在价值,还因为它可能通过产后期间与心理健康和身体健康结果相关。结果表明,有必要采取政策措施来确保人本护理,特别是分娩住院体验。

相似文献

1
Person-Centered Maternity Care and Health Outcomes at 1 and 6 Months Postpartum.以人为中心的产妇护理与产后 1 个月和 6 个月的健康结果。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Oct;31(10):1411-1421. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0643. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
Association between the person-centered maternity care experience and mental health after delivery in urban and rural Dhading, Nepal: a cross-sectional study.尼泊尔达丁城乡产妇以人为主导的孕产护理体验与产后心理健康的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 30;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05709-z.
3
Person-centered maternity care during childbirth and associated factors at selected public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2021: a cross-sectional study.2021 年,在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的选定公立医院中进行的以产妇为中心的分娩护理及其相关因素的横断面研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Oct 4;19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01503-w.
4
Person-centered maternity care and postnatal health: associations with maternal and newborn health outcomes.以人为主导的孕产护理与产后健康:与孕产妇和新生儿健康结局的关联
AJOG Glob Rep. 2021 Feb;1(1):100005. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100005.
5
Integrating support persons into maternity care and associations with quality of care: a postpartum survey of mothers and support persons in Kenya.将支持人员纳入产时保健并与护理质量相关联:肯尼亚母婴产后调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06611-y.
6
Turkish validity and reliability study for the person-centered maternity care scale.土耳其人本位分娩照护量表的效度和信度研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Sep;47(9):3211-3222. doi: 10.1111/jog.14913. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
7
Toward the development of a short multi-country person-centered maternity care scale.朝着开发一个简短的多国以人为主的产时护理量表迈进。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;146(1):80-87. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12827. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale at governmental health facilities in Cambodia.柬埔寨政府医疗机构中以个人为中心的孕产护理量表的验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0288051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288051. eCollection 2023.
9
Psychometric assessment of the US person-centered prenatal and maternity care scales in a low-income predominantly Latinx population in California.在美国加利福尼亚州的一个以拉丁裔为主的低收入人群中,对以个人为中心的产前和产妇护理量表进行心理测量评估。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02721-5.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Person-Centered Maternity Care Scale.《以人为主的孕产照顾量表中文版的跨文化调适与心理计量特性》。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 9;23(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05959-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Respectful maternity care experiences of South Asian refugees in the US: a qualitative study.美国南亚难民的尊重式孕产护理经历:一项定性研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;13:1613249. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613249. eCollection 2025.
2
How Woman-Centred Care Is Experienced and Understood in Maternity Services by Women and Professionals: A Rapid Review.女性和专业人员如何在产科服务中体验和理解以女性为中心的护理:一项快速综述。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70086. doi: 10.1111/scs.70086.
3
Person-Centered Perinatal Health Care and Empowerment During Pregnancy, Birth, and Postpartum: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Analysis.以人为主的围产期保健与孕期、分娩期及产后的赋权:一项横断面混合方法分析
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2025 May-Jun;70(3):476-485. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13760. Epub 2025 May 19.
4
Discrimination, racism, and bias in childbirth pain management in the United States: a scoping review and directions for research and clinical care.美国分娩疼痛管理中的歧视、种族主义和偏见:一项范围综述及研究与临床护理方向
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2025 Aug;63:104379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104379. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
5
Self-Advocacy Among Black Women During the Perinatal Period: Prevalence and Relationship to Patient Experiences.围产期黑人女性的自我倡导:患病率及其与患者体验的关系。
Birth. 2025 Jun;52(2):291-298. doi: 10.1111/birt.12885. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
6
A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of the 'Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience' (CPIPE) intervention in Kenya and Ghana: study protocol.一项在肯尼亚和加纳评估“关爱提供者以改善患者体验”(CPIPE)干预措施影响的整群随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):2509. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20023-9.
7
Translation and adaptation of the person-centered maternity care scale to a Persian-speaking population: a confirmatory factor analysis.将以人为中心的孕产护理量表翻译成波斯语人群:验证性因素分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):1619. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19117-1.
8
A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of the 'Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience' intervention on person-centered maternity care in Kenya and Ghana: Study Protocol.一项整群随机对照试验,旨在评估“关爱医护人员以改善患者体验”干预措施对肯尼亚和加纳以患者为中心的孕产妇护理的影响:研究方案。
Res Sq. 2024 May 10:rs.3.rs-4344678. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4344678/v1.
9
Patient and Provider Perspectives About the Use of Patient-Generated Health Data During Pregnancy: Qualitative Exploratory Study.患者与医疗服务提供者对孕期使用患者生成的健康数据的看法:定性探索性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 8;8:e52397. doi: 10.2196/52397.
10
The Social Context of Pregnancy, Respectful Maternity Care, Biomarkers of Weathering, and Postpartum Mental Health Inequities: A Scoping Review.怀孕的社会背景、尊重孕产妇护理、健康状况的生物标志物以及产后心理健康不平等:一项范围综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 15;21(4):480. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040480.

本文引用的文献

1
Antiracism Training in Medicine.医学领域的反种族主义培训
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 Dec 1;1(12):e201477. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.1477.
2
Will Improvements in Patient Experience With Care Impact Clinical and Quality of Care Outcomes?: A Systematic Review.患者对护理的体验改善是否会影响临床和护理质量结果?:系统评价。
Med Care. 2021 Sep 1;59(9):843-856. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001598.
3
Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color.发展以人为中心的有色人种产前护理量表。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):427.e1-427.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.216. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
A prospective cohort study of post-traumatic stress disorder and maternal-infant bonding after first childbirth.一项关于首次分娩后创伤后应激障碍和母婴联系的前瞻性队列研究。
J Psychosom Res. 2021 May;144:110424. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110424. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
5
Informed Consent and Shared Decision Making in Obstetrics and Gynecology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 819.知情同意和妇产科中的共同决策:美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见,第 819 号。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):e34-e41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004247.
6
Adjustment of Patient Experience Surveys for How People Respond.调整患者体验调查以适应人们的反应方式。
Med Care. 2021 Mar 1;59(3):202-205. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001489.
7
Community-informed models of perinatal and reproductive health services provision: A justice-centered paradigm toward equity among Black birthing communities.以社区为基础的围产期和生殖健康服务提供模式:以公正为中心的模式,实现黑人生育社区之间的公平。
Semin Perinatol. 2020 Aug;44(5):151267. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151267. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
8
Listening to Women: Recommendations from Women of Color to Improve Experiences in Pregnancy and Birth Care.倾听女性的声音:有色人种女性的建议,以改善怀孕和分娩护理体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jul;65(4):466-473. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13102. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
Births: Final Data for 2018.出生情况:2018年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Nov;68(13):1-47.
10
Association Between Mode of First Delivery and Subsequent Fecundity and Fertility.首次分娩方式与后续生育力和生育率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203076. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3076.