Suppr超能文献

一项关于钛过敏的回顾性研究:斑贴试验材料与表现。

A retrospective study on titanium sensitivity: Patch test materials and manifestations.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Oral Cell Biology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Aug;79(2):85-90. doi: 10.1111/cod.13010. Epub 2018 May 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Titanium is being increasingly used. Although it is considered to be a non-allergenic material, allergic reactions to it have been reported. Titanium dioxide has been found to be an unreliable patch test material. Few studies to date have profiled titanium allergy, and it therefore remains difficult to distinguish its manifestations.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate alternatives for titanium dioxide as a patch test preparation, and to profile titanium reactions and manifestations.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted with 458 patients who underwent patch testing with at least 1 of 5 different titanium salts.

RESULTS

At least 1 positive result was noted in 5.7% of the patients. The frequency of positive results for the tested salts ranged from 0.9% to 7.9%. Titanium(IV) oxalate hydrate had the highest yield and titanium dioxide the lowest. Erythema, dermatitis and local swelling were the most common objective complaints. In 16 (61.5%) patients, the test result had partial or full clinical relevance.

CONCLUSIONS

No titanium-specific risk factors and clinical picture could be identified. Titanium dioxide is not adequately sensitive for identifying titanium allergy. The titanium salts seem to be possible superior patch test preparations, but appear to be unsuitable if used singly. The patient's medical history and clinical picture remain crucial in the diagnostic work-up.

摘要

背景

钛的应用越来越广泛。尽管它被认为是非致敏材料,但也有报道称其会引起过敏反应。二氧化钛已被发现是一种不可靠的斑贴试验材料。迄今为止,很少有研究对钛过敏进行分析,因此仍然难以区分其表现。

目的

评估替代二氧化钛作为斑贴试验制剂的方法,并对钛的反应和表现进行分析。

方法

对 458 名接受至少 1 种 5 种不同钛盐斑贴试验的患者进行回顾性图表审查。

结果

5.7%的患者至少有 1 个阳性结果。测试盐的阳性结果频率从 0.9%到 7.9%不等。草酸氧钛水合物的阳性结果最高,而二氧化钛的阳性结果最低。红斑、皮炎和局部肿胀是最常见的客观投诉。在 16 名(61.5%)患者中,测试结果具有部分或全部临床相关性。

结论

无法确定钛的特定风险因素和临床表现。二氧化钛不能充分敏感地识别钛过敏。钛盐似乎是更好的斑贴试验制剂,但如果单独使用则不合适。患者的病史和临床表现仍然是诊断工作的关键。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Wound Healing Splinting Devices for Faster Access and Use.用于更快取用和使用的伤口愈合夹板装置。
JID Innov. 2024 Nov 28;5(2):100332. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100332. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
A Patch Test-Positive Titanium Hypersensitivity Reaction.斑贴试验阳性的钛过敏反应。
Dermatitis. 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):229-30. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000206.
5
Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review.植入生物材料:全面综述。
World J Clin Cases. 2015 Jan 16;3(1):52-7. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52.
6
Hypersensitivity reactions to titanium: diagnosis and management.对钛的超敏反应:诊断与管理
Dermatitis. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):7-25. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000091.
9
Painful hip arthroplasty: definition.疼痛性髋关节置换术:定义
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2011 May;8(2):19-22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验