Department of Psychiatry,Christian Medical College,Vellore,Tamil Nadu,India.
Department of Community Health,Christian Medical College,Vellore,Tamil Nadu,India.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Jan;31(1):133-138. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000625. Epub 2018 May 25.
ABSTRACTBackground and Aims:The changes in DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for dementia (Major neurocognitive disorder (NCD)) and mild cognitive impairment (mild NCD) mandate a re-evaluation of screening instruments. This study attempted to validate screening instruments, identify optimum threshold, and describe their indices of efficacy.
Consecutive people above the age of 65 years attending the outpatient department of a general hospital were recruited. They were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Vellore Screening Instruments for Dementia and were evaluated against the DSM-5 standard. Bivariate and multivariate statistics were obtained. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were drawn, optimum thresholds obtained, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values calculated.
One hundred and thirty four older people were recruited. The majority were women, married, with low levels of education, not employed, living with family, and had medical co-morbidity. A minority satisfied DSM-5 criteria for major (1.5%) and mild NCD (36.5%). The factors associated with NCD were older age, fewer years of education, and lower socio-economic status. MMSE, VSID patient, and VSID informant scores were significantly associated with NCD. The indices of efficacy for the MMSE and VSID patient version were modest for identifying Mild NCD. However, their performance in identifying major NCD was better. Nevertheless, optimal thresholds for recognition differed markedly from their originally recommended cut-offs.
The DSM-5 standards, with new and different cognitive domains, mandate a revaluation and recalibration of existing screening instruments. Ideally, new screening instruments, which match the cognitive domains and DSM-5 standard should be developed.
摘要
DSM-5 痴呆(主要神经认知障碍(NCD))和轻度认知障碍(轻度 NCD)的诊断标准的变化需要重新评估筛查工具。本研究试图验证筛查工具,确定最佳阈值,并描述其疗效指标。
连续招募年龄在 65 岁以上的综合医院门诊患者。他们使用简易精神状态检查(Mini-Mental State Examination)和维洛尔痴呆筛查工具(Vellore Screening Instruments for Dementia)进行评估,并与 DSM-5 标准进行对照。获得双变量和多变量统计数据。绘制受试者工作特征曲线,获得最佳阈值,计算灵敏度、特异性和预测值。
共招募了 134 名老年人。大多数是女性,已婚,受教育程度低,没有工作,与家人同住,并有多种医疗合并症。少数人符合 DSM-5 标准的主要(1.5%)和轻度 NCD(36.5%)。与 NCD 相关的因素是年龄较大、受教育年限较少和社会经济地位较低。简易精神状态检查、VSID 患者和 VSID 知情者评分与 NCD 显著相关。简易精神状态检查和 VSID 患者版本的疗效指标对识别轻度 NCD 的效果适中。然而,它们在识别主要 NCD 方面的表现更好。然而,识别的最佳阈值与最初推荐的截止值有很大差异。
DSM-5 标准具有新的和不同的认知领域,需要重新评估和重新校准现有的筛查工具。理想情况下,应该开发与认知领域和 DSM-5 标准相匹配的新的筛查工具。