School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
School of Social Work, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Aug;103:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 14.
In line with ICD-11 new conceptualization of Adjustment disorder (AjD), a self-report Adjustment Disorder-New Module (ADNM) was developed and validated. Nevertheless, the ADNM-20 is a long research tool and potentially problematic in the use in epidemiological and clinical studies. The present study introduces the brief ADNM-8 and the ultra-brief ADNM-4, examines their validity and establishes cut-off scores for their clinical use. The study used a representative national sample of 1003 Israelis who reported on the ICD-11 stress spectrum ranging from AjD, PTSD, complex PTSD and complicated grief. Construct validity was assessed via confirmatory factor analysis and cut-off scores were established through ROC analysis. The original and brief instruments were highly correlated (r > 0.918 or better). Cronbach's Alpha for the Brief ADNM-8 and the Ultra-Brief ADNM-4 were above 0.800. Correlations with stress related conditions indicated a good convergent and construct validity for both instruments as well. The ultra-brief ADNM-4 was found to have a very good fit with the data. These findings indicate that the brief ADNM-8 and the ultra-brief ADNM-4 can serve as a brief screening tools for assessing AjD symptoms according to the ICD-11 definition.
根据 ICD-11 对适应障碍(AjD)的新概念,开发并验证了一个自我报告的适应障碍新模块(ADNM)。然而,ADNM-20 是一个冗长的研究工具,在流行病学和临床研究中的使用可能存在问题。本研究介绍了简短的 ADNM-8 和超简短的 ADNM-4,检验了它们的有效性,并为其临床应用建立了截断分数。该研究使用了一个代表全国的 1003 名以色列人的样本,他们报告了 ICD-11 压力谱,范围从 AjD、PTSD、复杂 PTSD 和复杂悲伤。通过验证性因素分析评估结构效度,并通过 ROC 分析确定截断分数。原始和简短的工具高度相关(r > 0.918 或更好)。简短的 ADNM-8 和超简短的 ADNM-4 的克朗巴赫的 Alpha 值均高于 0.800。与应激相关疾病的相关性表明,这两种工具都具有良好的聚合效度和结构效度。超简短的 ADNM-4 与数据非常吻合。这些发现表明,简短的 ADNM-8 和超简短的 ADNM-4 可以作为根据 ICD-11 定义评估 AjD 症状的简短筛选工具。