Suppr超能文献

捍卫优生学:从隐秘选择到有意识的挑选。

Defending eugenics : From cryptic choice to conscious selection.

作者信息

Anomaly Jonathan

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul;35(1-4):24-35. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0081-2.

Abstract

For most of human history children have been a byproduct of sex rather than a conscious choice by parents to create people with traits that they care about. As our understanding of genetics advances along with our ability to control reproduction and manipulate genes, prospective parents have stronger moral reasons to consider how their choices are likely to affect their children, and how their children are likely to affect other people. With the advent of cheap and effective contraception, and the emergence of new technologies for in vitro fertilization, embryo selection, and genetic engineering, it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify rolling the genetic dice by having children without thinking about the traits they will have. It is time to face up to the awesome responsibilities that accompany our reproductive choices.

摘要

在人类历史的大部分时间里,孩子都是性行为的副产品,而非父母有意识地选择生育出具有他们所看重特质的人。随着我们对遗传学的理解不断进步,以及我们控制生育和操纵基因能力的提升,准父母们有了更强的道德理由去思考他们的选择可能如何影响自己的孩子,以及他们的孩子可能如何影响他人。随着廉价且有效的避孕措施的出现,以及体外受精、胚胎选择和基因工程等新技术的诞生,毫无顾忌地生育孩子而不考虑他们将会拥有的特质变得越来越难以自圆其说。是时候直面我们生殖选择所带来的重大责任了。

相似文献

3
In defense of prenatal genetic interventions.为产前基因干预辩护。
Bioethics. 2014 Sep;28(7):335-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02009.x. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
5
A sketch of L'avenir de la nature humaine.
APA Newsl Philos Med. 2003 Fall;3(1):155-7.
7
[Polygenic scores: towards designer babies?].[多基因评分:会走向设计婴儿吗?]
Med Sci (Paris). 2020 Mar;36(3):289-291. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2020028. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

2
Values in Psychometrics.心理测量学中的价值观。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 May;17(3):788-804. doi: 10.1177/17456916211014183. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
3
Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique.生殖载体筛查:回应优生学批判。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Dec;48(12):1060-1067. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107343. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Enhancing the collectivist critique: accounts of the human enhancement debate.增强的集体主义批判:人类增强辩论的观点。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):721-730. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10030-7. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
5
Can 'eugenics' be defended?“优生学”可以被辩护吗?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jul;39(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Lives Not Worth Living in Modern Euthanasia Regimes.现代安乐死制度下不值得活下去的生命。
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2019 Jun;16(2):134-136. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12300. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Ethical Challenges of Germline Genetic Enhancement.生殖系基因增强的伦理挑战。
Front Genet. 2019 Sep 3;10:767. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00767. eCollection 2019.
9
Eugenics Undefended.优生学无辩护之力。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct;37(1-2):68-75. doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00094-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics.行为遗传学的十大重复研究发现。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;11(1):3-23. doi: 10.1177/1745691615617439.
3
Public goods and procreation.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2014 Sep-Dec;32(3-4):172-88. doi: 10.1007/s40592-014-0011-x.
5
Wealth, intelligence, politics and global fertility differentials.
J Biosoc Sci. 2009 Jul;41(4):519-35. doi: 10.1017/S0021932009003344. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
7
Natural history of Ashkenazi intelligence.德系犹太人智力的自然史。
J Biosoc Sci. 2006 Sep;38(5):659-93. doi: 10.1017/S0021932005027069.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验