• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Defending eugenics : From cryptic choice to conscious selection.捍卫优生学:从隐秘选择到有意识的挑选。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul;35(1-4):24-35. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0081-2.
2
The post-humanist embryo: genetic manipulation, assisted reproductive technologies and the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.后人文主义胚胎:基因操纵、辅助生殖技术与生殖利他主义原则
Cuad Bioet. 2014 Sep-Dec;25(85):427-43.
3
In defense of prenatal genetic interventions.为产前基因干预辩护。
Bioethics. 2014 Sep;28(7):335-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02009.x. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
4
The nonidentity problem, disability, and the role morality of prospective parents.
Ethics. 2005 Oct;116(1):132-52. doi: 10.1086/454369.
5
A sketch of L'avenir de la nature humaine.
APA Newsl Philos Med. 2003 Fall;3(1):155-7.
6
Procreative altruism: beyond individualism in reproductive selection.生殖利他主义:超越生殖选择中的个人主义
J Med Philos. 2013 Aug;38(4):400-19. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht022.
7
[Polygenic scores: towards designer babies?].[多基因评分:会走向设计婴儿吗?]
Med Sci (Paris). 2020 Mar;36(3):289-291. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2020028. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
The protection of the human embryo in vitro. Report by the Working Party of the Human Embryo and Fetus.体外人类胚胎的保护。人类胚胎与胎儿工作小组报告
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2004;10(1):5-35.
9
Moral issues arising from genetics.遗传学引发的道德问题。
Listening. 1987 Winter;22(1):65-85.
10
Medical study: aspiring parents, genotypes and phenotypes: the unexamined myth of the perfect baby.医学研究:准父母、基因型与表型:完美婴儿的未经审视的神话
Albany Law Rev. 2005;68(4):1097-111.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations.胚胎多基因疾病风险筛查:流行病学、临床和伦理考虑的综述。
Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Oct 1;30(5):529-557. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae012.
2
Values in Psychometrics.心理测量学中的价值观。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 May;17(3):788-804. doi: 10.1177/17456916211014183. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
3
Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique.生殖载体筛查:回应优生学批判。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Dec;48(12):1060-1067. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107343. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Enhancing the collectivist critique: accounts of the human enhancement debate.增强的集体主义批判:人类增强辩论的观点。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Dec;24(4):721-730. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10030-7. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
5
Can 'eugenics' be defended?“优生学”可以被辩护吗?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jul;39(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Lives Not Worth Living in Modern Euthanasia Regimes.现代安乐死制度下不值得活下去的生命。
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2019 Jun;16(2):134-136. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12300. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Ethical Challenges of Germline Genetic Enhancement.生殖系基因增强的伦理挑战。
Front Genet. 2019 Sep 3;10:767. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00767. eCollection 2019.
8
The problem with reproductive freedom. Procreation beyond procreators' interests.生育自由的问题。超出生育者意愿的生育行为。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Mar;23(1):131-140. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09917-3.
9
Eugenics Undefended.优生学无辩护之力。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct;37(1-2):68-75. doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00094-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics.行为遗传学的十大重复研究发现。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;11(1):3-23. doi: 10.1177/1745691615617439.
2
Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies.基于五十年双胞胎研究的人类特征遗传力的荟萃分析。
Nat Genet. 2015 Jul;47(7):702-9. doi: 10.1038/ng.3285. Epub 2015 May 18.
3
Public goods and procreation.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2014 Sep-Dec;32(3-4):172-88. doi: 10.1007/s40592-014-0011-x.
4
Breaking evolution's chains: the prospect of deliberate genetic modification in humans.打破进化的枷锁:人类进行蓄意基因改造的前景。
J Med Philos. 2011 Feb;36(1):6-27. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq057. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
5
Wealth, intelligence, politics and global fertility differentials.
J Biosoc Sci. 2009 Jul;41(4):519-35. doi: 10.1017/S0021932009003344. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
6
The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life.创造拥有过上最佳生活的最大机会的孩子的道德义务。
Bioethics. 2009 Jun;23(5):274-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00687.x.
7
Natural history of Ashkenazi intelligence.德系犹太人智力的自然史。
J Biosoc Sci. 2006 Sep;38(5):659-93. doi: 10.1017/S0021932005027069.

捍卫优生学:从隐秘选择到有意识的挑选。

Defending eugenics : From cryptic choice to conscious selection.

作者信息

Anomaly Jonathan

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul;35(1-4):24-35. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0081-2.

DOI:10.1007/s40592-018-0081-2
PMID:29804244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6096849/
Abstract

For most of human history children have been a byproduct of sex rather than a conscious choice by parents to create people with traits that they care about. As our understanding of genetics advances along with our ability to control reproduction and manipulate genes, prospective parents have stronger moral reasons to consider how their choices are likely to affect their children, and how their children are likely to affect other people. With the advent of cheap and effective contraception, and the emergence of new technologies for in vitro fertilization, embryo selection, and genetic engineering, it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify rolling the genetic dice by having children without thinking about the traits they will have. It is time to face up to the awesome responsibilities that accompany our reproductive choices.

摘要

在人类历史的大部分时间里,孩子都是性行为的副产品,而非父母有意识地选择生育出具有他们所看重特质的人。随着我们对遗传学的理解不断进步,以及我们控制生育和操纵基因能力的提升,准父母们有了更强的道德理由去思考他们的选择可能如何影响自己的孩子,以及他们的孩子可能如何影响他人。随着廉价且有效的避孕措施的出现,以及体外受精、胚胎选择和基因工程等新技术的诞生,毫无顾忌地生育孩子而不考虑他们将会拥有的特质变得越来越难以自圆其说。是时候直面我们生殖选择所带来的重大责任了。