• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“优生学”可以被辩护吗?

Can 'eugenics' be defended?

机构信息

University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jul;39(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1. Epub 2021 May 25.

DOI:10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1
PMID:34033008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8321981/
Abstract

In recent years, bioethical discourse around the topic of 'genetic enhancement' has become increasingly politicized. We fear there is too much focus on the semantic question of whether we should call particular practices and emerging bio-technologies such as CRISPR 'eugenics', rather than the more important question of how we should view them from the perspective of ethics and policy. Here, we address the question of whether 'eugenics' can be defended and how proponents and critics of enhancement should engage with each other.

摘要

近年来,围绕“基因增强”这一主题的生物伦理讨论变得越来越政治化。我们担心人们过于关注某些特定实践和新兴生物技术(如 CRISPR)是否应被称为“优生学”的语义问题,而不是从伦理和政策角度看待它们的更重要问题。在这里,我们探讨了“优生学”是否可以被辩护以及增强的支持者和批评者应该如何相互交往的问题。

相似文献

1
Can 'eugenics' be defended?“优生学”可以被辩护吗?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jul;39(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00129-1. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
Eugenics offended.优生学受到冒犯。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Oct;39(2):169-176. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00145-1. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Shaping the CRISPR Gene-Editing Debate: Questions About Enhancement and Germline Modification.塑造CRISPR基因编辑辩论:关于增强和生殖系修饰的问题
Perspect Biol Med. 2020;63(1):141-154. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2020.0011.
4
In vitro eugenics.体外优生学
J Med Ethics. 2014 Nov;40(11):725-31. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101200. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
5
Realigning gene editing with clinical research ethics: What the "CRISPR Twins" debacle means for Chinese and international research ethics governance.重新调整基因编辑与临床研究伦理的关系:“CRISPR 双胞胎”事件对中西方研究伦理治理的启示
Account Res. 2019 May;26(4):257-264. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1617138. Epub 2019 May 17.
6
How We Got to CRISPR: The Dilemma of Being Human.我们如何走向CRISPR:身为人类的困境。
Perspect Biol Med. 2020;63(1):28-43. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2020.0002.
7
[Application of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats- associated protein 9 gene editing technology for treatment of HBV infection].[成簇规律间隔短回文重复序列相关蛋白9基因编辑技术在治疗乙型肝炎病毒感染中的应用]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 20;26(11):860-864. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2018.11.012.
8
The Moral Choices on CRISPR Babies.关于基因编辑婴儿的道德抉择。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Oct;19(10):15-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1644824.
9
Looking into the shadow: the eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices.审视阴影:生殖技术与实践辩论中的优生学观点
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Dec;36(1-4):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0086-x.
10
Moving Beyond 'Therapy' and 'Enhancement' in the Ethics of Gene Editing.超越基因编辑伦理中的“治疗”与“增强”
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Oct;28(4):695-707. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000641.

引用本文的文献

1
Modular Ontologies for Genetically Modified People and their Bioethical Implications.转基因人类的模块化本体及其生物伦理意义。
Nanoethics. 2024;18(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s11569-024-00459-4. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations.胚胎多基因疾病风险筛查:流行病学、临床和伦理考虑的综述。
Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Oct 1;30(5):529-557. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae012.

本文引用的文献

1
Recognizing the Diversity of Cognitive Enhancements.认识到认知增强的多样性。
AJOB Neurosci. 2020 Oct-Dec;11(4):250-253. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1830878.
2
In vivo base editing restores sensory transduction and transiently improves auditory function in a mouse model of recessive deafness.在体内进行碱基编辑可恢复隐性耳聋小鼠模型中的感觉转导,并短暂改善听觉功能。
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Jun 3;12(546). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay9101.
3
Eugenics Undefended.优生学无辩护之力。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct;37(1-2):68-75. doi: 10.1007/s40592-019-00094-w.
4
Great minds think different: Preserving cognitive diversity in an age of gene editing.高瞻远瞩,见异思迁:在基因编辑时代保持认知多样性。
Bioethics. 2020 Jan;34(1):81-89. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12585. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
5
Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics.为何我们应将基因编辑捍卫为优生学。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 Jan;28(1):9-19. doi: 10.1017/S0963180118000336.
6
Looking into the shadow: the eugenics argument in debates on reproductive technologies and practices.审视阴影:生殖技术与实践辩论中的优生学观点
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Dec;36(1-4):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0086-x.
7
Defending eugenics : From cryptic choice to conscious selection.捍卫优生学:从隐秘选择到有意识的挑选。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul;35(1-4):24-35. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0081-2.
8
Moderate eugenics and human enhancement.适度优生学与人类增强
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Feb;17(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9485-1.
9
Breaking evolution's chains: the prospect of deliberate genetic modification in humans.打破进化的枷锁:人类进行蓄意基因改造的前景。
J Med Philos. 2011 Feb;36(1):6-27. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq057. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
10
"Eugenics talk" and the language of bioethics.“优生学言论”与生物伦理学语言
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jun;34(6):467-71. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021592.