Schreiner Constanze, Appel Markus, Isberner Maj-Britt, Richter Tobias
Psychology Department, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Psychology Department, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Discourse Process. 2017 Jan 23;55(4):371-386. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2016.1257406. eCollection 2018.
Stories are a powerful means to change people's attitudes and beliefs. The aim of the current work was to shed light on the role of argument strength (argument quality) in narrative persuasion. The present study examined the influence of strong versus weak arguments on attitudes in a low or high narrative context. Moreover, baseline attitudes, interindividual differences in working memory capacity, and recipients' transportation were examined. Stories with strong arguments were more persuasive than stories with weak arguments. This main effect was qualified by a two-way interaction with baseline attitude, revealing that argument strength had a greater impact on individuals who initially were particularly doubtful toward the story claim. Furthermore, we identified a three-way interaction showing that argument strength mattered most for recipients who were deeply transported into the story world in stories that followed a typical narrative structure. These findings provide an important specification of narrative persuasion theory.
故事是改变人们态度和信念的有力手段。当前研究的目的是阐明论据强度(论据质量)在叙事说服中的作用。本研究考察了强弱论据在低或高叙事语境中对态度的影响。此外,还考察了基线态度、工作记忆容量的个体差异以及接受者的沉浸感。有强论据的故事比有弱论据的故事更具说服力。这一主要效应受到与基线态度的双向交互作用的影响,表明论据强度对最初对故事主张特别怀疑的个体影响更大。此外,我们还发现了一个三向交互作用,表明在遵循典型叙事结构的故事中,论据强度对深深沉浸于故事世界的接受者最为重要。这些发现为叙事说服理论提供了重要的具体说明。