Hocquette Jean-François, Ellies-Oury Marie-Pierre, Lherm Michel, Pineau Christele, Deblitz Claus, Farmer Linda
Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Bordeaux Science Agro, 1 cours du Général de Gaulle, CS 40201, 33175 Gradignan, France.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018 Jul;31(7):1017-1035. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0196. Epub 2018 May 24.
The European Union (EU) is the world's third largest producer of beef. This contributes to the economy, rural development, social life, culture and gastronomy of Europe. The diversity of breeds, animal types (cows, bulls, steers, heifers) and farming systems (intensive, extensive on permanent or temporary pastures, mixed, breeders, feeders, etc) is a strength, and a weakness as the industry is often fragmented and poorly connected. There are also societal concerns regarding animal welfare and environmental issues, despite some positive environmental impacts of farming systems. The EU is amongst the most efficient for beef production as demonstrated by a relative low production of greenhouse gases. Due to regional differences in terms of climate, pasture availability, livestock practices and farms characteristics, productivity and incomes of beef producers vary widely across regions, being among the lowest of the agricultural systems. The beef industry is facing unprecedented challenges related to animal welfare, environmental impact, origin, authenticity, nutritional benefits and eating quality of beef. These may affect the whole industry, especially its farmers. It is therefore essential to bring the beef industry together to spread best practice and better exploit research to maintain and develop an economically viable and sustainable beef industry. Meeting consumers' expectations may be achieved by a better prediction of beef palatability using a modelling approach, such as in Australia. There is a need for accurate information and dissemination on the benefits and issues of beef for human health and for environmental impact. A better objective description of goods and services derived from livestock farming is also required. Putting into practice "agroecology" and organic farming principles are other potential avenues for the future. Different future scenarios can be written depending on the major driving forces, notably meat consumption, climate change, environmental policies and future organization of the supply chain.
欧盟是世界第三大牛肉生产地。这对欧洲的经济、农村发展、社会生活、文化和美食都有贡献。品种、动物类型(母牛、公牛、阉牛、小母牛)和养殖系统(集约化、在永久或临时牧场上的粗放式、混合式、饲养繁殖者、饲养者等)的多样性既是优势,也是劣势,因为该行业往往分散且联系不佳。尽管养殖系统对环境有一些积极影响,但社会上仍存在对动物福利和环境问题的担忧。欧盟在牛肉生产方面效率颇高,温室气体排放量相对较低就证明了这一点。由于气候、牧场可利用性、畜牧 practices 和农场特征方面的区域差异,牛肉生产者的生产力和收入在各地区差异很大,是农业系统中最低的之一。牛肉行业正面临与动物福利、环境影响、牛肉来源、真实性、营养价值和食用品质相关的前所未有的挑战。这些可能会影响整个行业,尤其是农民。因此,将牛肉行业聚集起来传播最佳实践并更好地利用研究成果,以维持和发展经济上可行且可持续的牛肉行业至关重要。通过采用建模方法,如在澳大利亚那样,更好地预测牛肉的适口性,或许可以满足消费者的期望。需要准确提供关于牛肉对人类健康的益处和问题以及对环境影响的信息并进行传播。还需要对畜牧养殖产生的商品和服务进行更客观的描述。将“农业生态学”和有机农业原则付诸实践是未来的其他潜在途径。根据主要驱动力,特别是肉类消费、气候变化、环境政策和供应链的未来组织形式,可以描绘出不同的未来情景。