Ryschawy J, Disenhaus C, Bertrand S, Allaire G, Aznar O, Plantureux S, Josien E, Guinot C, Lasseur J, Perrot C, Tchakerian E, Aubert C, Tichit M
1AGIR,Université de Toulouse,INP-ENSAT,INP-Purpan,INRA,31320 Auzeville,France.
2UMR 1348 PEGASE,INRA-AGROCAMPUS-OUEST,35042 Rennes,France.
Animal. 2017 Oct;11(10):1861-1872. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000829. Epub 2017 May 11.
Livestock farming is an essential activity in many rural areas, where it contributes to the maintenance of soil fertility and farmland biodiversity, as well as to a set of social public goods including food security, rural vitality and culture. However, livestock sustainability assessments tend to focus primarily on environmental and economic dimensions; therefore, these valuations might be limited because they do not consider the complete set of associated goods and services (GS). Hence, a need exists to recognise the multiple contributions provided by livestock to human well-being and society. The objective of this study was to analyse the provision of multiple GS derived from livestock across regions in France and empirically demonstrate sets of GS that repeatedly appeared together. We designated these multiple GS provided by livestock as contributions to productive, environmental, rural vitality and cultural benefits that human populations derive directly or indirectly from livestock agroecosystems. First, we combined expert knowledge with results of a literature review to define a bundle of GS provided by livestock. We then described indicators that quantified each good or service and screened national databases to determine the availability of supporting data. Finally, we assessed the GS and their relationships (synergies or trade-offs) on a nation-wide gradient in France at the department level (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics 3). Four main categories of GS were considered: provisioning (e.g. food quantity and quality), environmental quality (e.g. biodiversity, landscape heterogeneity, water quality), rural vitality (e.g. employment, rural dynamism) and culture (e.g. gastronomy and landscape heritage). Four major types of GS bundles were identified, which suggested strong contrasts among French rural areas in terms of the nature of the GS that occurred together and their levels of provision. GS bundles in France had a non-random spatial distribution. This study represents an initial step towards developing a methodology to consider GS bundles provided by livestock. Nonetheless, further research is needed to understand socio-economic, environmental, political and geographic determinants of the composition of GS bundles.
畜牧业在许多农村地区都是一项重要活动,它有助于维持土壤肥力和农田生物多样性,还能提供一系列社会公共产品,包括粮食安全、农村活力和文化。然而,畜牧业可持续性评估往往主要侧重于环境和经济层面;因此,这些评估可能存在局限性,因为它们没有考虑到所有相关的商品和服务。因此,有必要认识到畜牧业对人类福祉和社会的多重贡献。本研究的目的是分析法国各地区畜牧业提供的多种商品和服务,并通过实证证明反复同时出现的商品和服务组合。我们将畜牧业提供的这些多种商品和服务指定为对人类直接或间接从畜牧农业生态系统中获得的生产、环境、农村活力和文化效益的贡献。首先,我们将专家知识与文献综述结果相结合,以定义畜牧业提供的一系列商品和服务。然后,我们描述了量化每种商品或服务的指标,并筛选国家数据库以确定支持数据的可用性。最后,我们在法国全国范围内按部门级别(统计领土单位命名法3)评估了商品和服务及其关系(协同作用或权衡取舍)。我们考虑了四类主要的商品和服务:供给(如食品数量和质量)、环境质量(如生物多样性、景观异质性、水质)、农村活力(如就业、农村活力)和文化(如美食和景观遗产)。确定了四种主要类型的商品和服务组合,这表明法国农村地区在同时出现的商品和服务的性质及其提供水平方面存在强烈差异。法国的商品和服务组合具有非随机的空间分布。本研究是朝着开发一种考虑畜牧业提供的商品和服务组合的方法迈出的第一步。尽管如此,仍需要进一步研究以了解商品和服务组合构成的社会经济、环境、政治和地理决定因素。