• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定位和调整研究证据有助于公共卫生决策。

Localising and tailoring research evidence helps public health decision making.

机构信息

School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.

Public Health, Northumberland County Council, Morpeth, UK.

出版信息

Health Info Libr J. 2018 Sep;35(3):202-212. doi: 10.1111/hir.12219. Epub 2018 May 29.

DOI:10.1111/hir.12219
PMID:29808957
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Published research evidence is typically not readily applicable to practice but needs to be actively mobilised.

OBJECTIVES

This paper explores the mechanisms used by information professionals with a specific knowledge mobilisation role to make evidence useful for local decision making and planning of public health interventions.

METHODS

Data are drawn from a NIHR project that studied how, when, where and by whom published research evidence is used in commissioning and planning across two sites (one in England and one in Scotland). Data included 11 in-depth interviews with information professionals, observations at meetings and documentary analysis.

RESULTS

Published research evidence is made fit for local commissioning and planning purposes by information professionals through two mechanisms. They localise evidence (relate evidence to local context and needs) and tailor it (present actionable messages).

DISCUSSION

Knowledge mobilisation roles of information professionals are not recognised and researched. Information professionals contribute to the 'inform' and 'relational' functions of knowledge mobilisation; however, they are less involved in improving the institutional environment for sustainable knowledge sharing.

CONCLUSION

Information professionals are instrumental in shaping what evidence enters local decision making processes. Identifying and supporting knowledge mobilisation roles within health libraries should be the focus of future research and training.

摘要

背景

已发表的研究证据通常不易应用于实践,需要积极调动。

目的

本文探讨了具有特定知识调动角色的信息专业人员使用的机制,以使证据对当地决策和公共卫生干预规划有用。

方法

数据来自于一项 NIHR 项目,该项目研究了在两个地点(一个在英格兰,一个在苏格兰)的委托和规划中,何时、何地以及由谁使用了已发表的研究证据。数据包括对 11 名信息专业人员的深入访谈、会议观察和文件分析。

结果

信息专业人员通过两种机制使发表的研究证据适用于当地的委托和规划目的。他们使证据本地化(将证据与当地背景和需求联系起来)并对其进行调整(提供可操作的信息)。

讨论

信息专业人员的知识调动角色尚未得到认可和研究。信息专业人员为知识调动的“告知”和“关系”功能做出了贡献;然而,他们在改善可持续知识共享的制度环境方面的参与度较低。

结论

信息专业人员在塑造哪些证据进入当地决策过程方面具有重要作用。确定和支持卫生图书馆中的知识调动角色应该是未来研究和培训的重点。

相似文献

1
Localising and tailoring research evidence helps public health decision making.定位和调整研究证据有助于公共卫生决策。
Health Info Libr J. 2018 Sep;35(3):202-212. doi: 10.1111/hir.12219. Epub 2018 May 29.
2
Tools to support evidence-informed public health decision making.支持循证公共卫生决策的工具。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 18;14:728. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-728.
3
Innovation and diversity in public health team engagement in local alcohol premises licensing: qualitative interview findings from the ExILEnS study.公共卫生团队参与当地酒精场所许可的创新与多样性:ExILEnS研究的定性访谈结果
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jan;13(2):1-19. doi: 10.3310/RNVD1542.
4
Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23.快速证据综述知识转化以在公共卫生紧急情况下为卫生和社会保健政策和实践提供信息:2021-2023 年威尔士 COVID-19 证据中心流程和影响评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 26;19(11):e0314461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314461. eCollection 2024.
5
Factors influencing public health engagement in alcohol licensing in England and Scotland including legal and structural differences: comparative interview analysis.影响英格兰和苏格兰酒精许可中公众健康参与度的因素,包括法律和结构差异:比较访谈分析
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;13(2):1-42. doi: 10.3310/BGTR4277.
6
Incorporation of a health economic modelling tool into public health commissioning: Evidence use in a politicised context.将健康经济建模工具纳入公共卫生委托代理:政治化背景下的证据使用。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;186:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
7
Obstacles and opportunities to using research evidence in local public health decision-making in England.在英格兰,将研究证据用于地方公共卫生决策的障碍和机遇。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 28;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0446-x.
8
Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in healthcare. study protocol.在管理决策中理解证据:基于研究的知识在医疗保健中的创新采用和实施的作用。研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-22.
9
10
Promoting Evidence-Based Decision Making in a Local Health Department, Pueblo City-County, Colorado.在科罗拉多州普韦布洛市县的地方卫生部门推动循证决策
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 25;12:E100. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140507.

引用本文的文献

1
"Who's got the infants in mind?" A qualitative exploration of the barriers and enablers to commissioning parent-infant relationship services in England.“谁在为婴儿着想?”对英格兰委托开展亲子关系服务的障碍与促进因素的质性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):1020. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13215-5.
2
Performance Metrics for Measles Response Optimization in the United States: Considerations for Public Health Research, Policy, and Practice.美国麻疹应对优化的绩效指标:公共卫生研究、政策与实践的考量
Public Health Rep. 2025 Jul 5:333549251322667. doi: 10.1177/00333549251322667.
3
Quality, Usability, and Trust Challenges to Effective Data Use in the Deployment and Use of the Bangladesh Nutrition Information System Dashboard: Qualitative Study.
质量、可用性和信任挑战对孟加拉营养信息系统仪表板的部署和使用中的有效数据使用的影响:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 30;26:e48294. doi: 10.2196/48294.
4
Research outcomes informing the selection of public health interventions and strategies to implement them: A cross-sectional survey of Australian policy-maker and practitioner preferences.研究结果为公共卫生干预措施和实施策略的选择提供信息:澳大利亚政策制定者和实践者偏好的横断面调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 14;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01144-4.
5
Influencing policy and practice is work in progress.影响政策和实践是一个持续进行的工作。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Feb 3;6(3):1714. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1714. eCollection 2021.
6
Co-production in local government: process, codification and capacity building of new knowledge in collective reflection spaces. Workshops findings from a UK mixed methods study.地方政府中的共同生产:集体反思空间中新知识的形成过程、编纂与能力建设。英国一项混合方法研究的研讨会结果
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jan 29;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00677-2.
7
Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England.地方身体活动利益相关者面临的挑战、机遇和解决方案:英格兰东北部跨部门身体活动网络的实施案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1760. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09847-3.
8
Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services.推进范围综述方法学:一项范围文献综述(SLR)提出的建议,以推动儿童和青少年心理健康服务的变革。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01127-3.
9
Mechanisms and pathways to impact in public health research: a preliminary analysis of research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).影响公共卫生研究的机制和途径:对英国国家卫生研究所(NIHR)资助的研究的初步分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 19;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0905-7.