Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States.
Elife. 2018 May 29;7:e36629. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36629.
CLC channels mediate passive Cl conduction, while CLC transporters mediate active Cl transport coupled to H transport in the opposite direction. The distinction between CLC-0/1/2 channels and CLC transporters seems undetectable by amino acid sequence. To understand why they are different functionally we determined the structure of the human CLC-1 channel. Its 'glutamate gate' residue, known to mediate proton transfer in CLC transporters, adopts a location in the structure that appears to preclude it from its transport function. Furthermore, smaller side chains produce a wider pore near the intracellular surface, potentially reducing a kinetic barrier for Cl conduction. When the corresponding residues are mutated in a transporter, it is converted to a channel. Finally, Cl at key sites in the pore appear to interact with reduced affinity compared to transporters. Thus, subtle differences in glutamate gate conformation, internal pore diameter and Cl affinity distinguish CLC channels and transporters.
CLC 通道介导被动氯离子传导,而 CLC 转运体则介导与质子逆向转运相偶联的主动氯离子转运。CLC-0/1/2 通道和 CLC 转运体之间的区别似乎无法通过氨基酸序列检测到。为了了解它们在功能上为什么不同,我们测定了人 CLC-1 通道的结构。其“谷氨酸门”残基,已知在 CLC 转运体中介导质子转移,在结构中采用了一种似乎排除其转运功能的位置。此外,较小的侧链在胞内表面附近产生更宽的孔,可能会降低氯离子传导的动力学障碍。当转运体中的相应残基发生突变时,它会转变为通道。最后,在孔中的关键位置的氯离子似乎与转运体相比亲和力降低。因此,谷氨酸门构象、内部孔径和氯离子亲和力的细微差异将 CLC 通道和转运体区分开来。