Haller J, Czembirek H, Salomonowitz E, Laggner A, Sommer G, Tscholakoff D, Leitner H, Kleinberger G
Rofo. 1985 Jan;142(1):68-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052602.
Radiological staging of pulmonary oedema was compared with the determination of extra-vascular lung water by means of a double indicator dilution technique. One hundred and forty-six ward chest radiographs were evaluated and compared with the results of simultaneous measurements of lung water. Seventy-seven cases could be evaluated statistically. Chest x-rays regarded as normal corresponded to extra-vascular lung water of 5 to 9 ml./kg. body weight. Interstitial oedema (radiological stage I and II) corresponded to extravascular lung water levels of 8 to 12 ml./kg. Differentiation of stages I and II was not possible. During stage III, extra-vascular lung water was 15 to 21 ml./kg. A comparative analyses of these findings revealed a discrepancy of 34%. The reasons for this are discussed.
通过双指示剂稀释技术,将肺水肿的放射学分期与血管外肺水的测定结果进行了比较。对146张病房胸部X光片进行了评估,并与同时测量的肺水结果进行了比较。其中77例可进行统计学评估。被视为正常的胸部X光片对应的血管外肺水为5至9毫升/千克体重。间质性水肿(放射学分期I和II)对应的血管外肺水水平为8至12毫升/千克。I期和II期无法区分。在III期,血管外肺水为15至21毫升/千克。对这些结果的比较分析显示差异为34%。文中讨论了其原因。