Pace F, Bröker H J, Caspary W, Domschke W, Feurle G, Fimmel C J, Hackenberg K, Hammer B, Holtermüller K H, Hotz J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1985 Feb 22;110(8):283-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1068813.
In a multi-centre double-blind (double-dummy) trial the effectiveness of low-dose antacid gel (6 X 12 ml/d; neutralisation capacity 120 mmol) was compared with that of a standard dose of cimetidine (1 g/d) in the curative treatment of gastric ulcer. Antacid gel was given to 65 patients, cimetidine to 60. Diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy, which was also employed in a serial follow-up. After 4 weeks antacid gel and cimetidine produced cures in 43% and 52%, respectively; after 8 weeks 76% and 89%, respectively, the difference between the two methods not being statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference with regard to ulcer pain. In one case each in the antacid and cimetidine groups, the treatment had to be stopped because of side effects. Diarrhoea was more common on cimetidine than on antacid gel. It is concluded that both low-dose antacids gels and cimetidine are suitable in the treatment of gastric ulcers.
在一项多中心双盲(双模拟)试验中,比较了低剂量抗酸凝胶(6×12毫升/天;中和能力120毫摩尔)与标准剂量西咪替丁(1克/天)治疗胃溃疡的疗效。65例患者给予抗酸凝胶,60例患者给予西咪替丁。通过内镜活检确诊,内镜活检也用于系列随访。4周后,抗酸凝胶和西咪替丁的治愈率分别为43%和52%;8周后分别为76%和89%,两种方法之间的差异无统计学意义。在溃疡疼痛方面也无统计学显著差异。抗酸凝胶组和西咪替丁组各有1例因副作用而不得不停止治疗。西咪替丁组腹泻比抗酸凝胶组更常见。结论是低剂量抗酸凝胶和西咪替丁均适用于胃溃疡的治疗。