Suppr超能文献

[低剂量抗酸凝胶与西咪替丁治疗胃溃疡。一项多中心双盲研究]

[Therapy of stomach ulcer with low-dose antacid gel and cimetidine. A multicenter double-blind study].

作者信息

Pace F, Bröker H J, Caspary W, Domschke W, Feurle G, Fimmel C J, Hackenberg K, Hammer B, Holtermüller K H, Hotz J

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1985 Feb 22;110(8):283-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1068813.

Abstract

In a multi-centre double-blind (double-dummy) trial the effectiveness of low-dose antacid gel (6 X 12 ml/d; neutralisation capacity 120 mmol) was compared with that of a standard dose of cimetidine (1 g/d) in the curative treatment of gastric ulcer. Antacid gel was given to 65 patients, cimetidine to 60. Diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic biopsy, which was also employed in a serial follow-up. After 4 weeks antacid gel and cimetidine produced cures in 43% and 52%, respectively; after 8 weeks 76% and 89%, respectively, the difference between the two methods not being statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference with regard to ulcer pain. In one case each in the antacid and cimetidine groups, the treatment had to be stopped because of side effects. Diarrhoea was more common on cimetidine than on antacid gel. It is concluded that both low-dose antacids gels and cimetidine are suitable in the treatment of gastric ulcers.

摘要

在一项多中心双盲(双模拟)试验中,比较了低剂量抗酸凝胶(6×12毫升/天;中和能力120毫摩尔)与标准剂量西咪替丁(1克/天)治疗胃溃疡的疗效。65例患者给予抗酸凝胶,60例患者给予西咪替丁。通过内镜活检确诊,内镜活检也用于系列随访。4周后,抗酸凝胶和西咪替丁的治愈率分别为43%和52%;8周后分别为76%和89%,两种方法之间的差异无统计学意义。在溃疡疼痛方面也无统计学显著差异。抗酸凝胶组和西咪替丁组各有1例因副作用而不得不停止治疗。西咪替丁组腹泻比抗酸凝胶组更常见。结论是低剂量抗酸凝胶和西咪替丁均适用于胃溃疡的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验