Carey Timothy A, Sirett David, Wakerman John, Russell Deborah, Humphreys John S
Centre for Remote Health, Flinders University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Flinders NT, Flinders University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health. 2018 Jun;26(3):146-156. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12425. Epub 2018 May 29.
Visiting health services are a feature of health care delivery in rural and remote contexts. These services are often described as 'fly-in fly-out' or 'drive-in drive-out'. Posing the question 'What are the different types of visiting models of primary health care being used in rural and remote communities?', the objective of this article was to describe a typology of models of health services that visit remote communities. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature from established databases was undertaken. Data were extracted from 20 papers (16 peer-reviewed papers and four from other sources), which met the inclusion criteria. From the available evidence, it was difficult to develop a typology of services. The central feature of service providers visiting rural and remote districts on a regular basis was consistent, although the service provider's geographical base varied and the extent to which the same service provider should be providing the service was not consistently endorsed. While a clear typology did not emerge from the systematic review, it became apparent that a set of guiding principles might be more helpful to service providers and planners. Focusing policy and decision-making on important principles of visiting services, rather than their typological features, is likely to be of ultimately more benefit to the health outcomes of people who live in rural and remote communities.
上门医疗服务是农村和偏远地区医疗服务提供的一个特点。这些服务通常被描述为“飞来飞去”或“开车往返”模式。本文提出“农村和偏远社区正在使用的初级卫生保健上门模式有哪些不同类型?”这一问题,目的是描述为偏远社区提供服务的卫生服务模式类型。我们对来自知名数据库的同行评审文献进行了系统综述。从符合纳入标准的20篇论文(16篇同行评审论文和4篇其他来源的论文)中提取了数据。根据现有证据,很难形成一种服务类型。定期到农村和偏远地区提供服务的服务提供者的核心特点是一致的,尽管服务提供者的地理基地不同,而且同一服务提供者提供服务的程度也未得到一致认可。虽然系统综述没有得出明确的类型,但很明显,一套指导原则可能对服务提供者和规划者更有帮助。将政策和决策重点放在上门服务的重要原则上,而不是其类型特征上,最终可能会对农村和偏远社区居民的健康结果更有益。