• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 Facebook 的动机和青少年使用 Facebook 存在问题。

Motives to use Facebook and problematic Facebook use in adolescents.

机构信息

1 Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione, Università degli Studi di Padova , Padova, Italy.

2 Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University , London, UK.

出版信息

J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):276-283. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.32. Epub 2018 May 30.

DOI:10.1556/2006.7.2018.32
PMID:29846087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6174593/
Abstract

Background and aims There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that problematic Facebook use (PFU) is an emerging problem, particularly among adolescents. Although a number of motivations explaining why people engage in frequent Facebook use have been identified, less is known about the specific psychological needs underlying PFU. The aim of this study is to test a model designed to assess the unique contribution of psychological motives for using Facebook to the different PFU dimensions in a sample of adolescents. Methods A total of 864 Italian adolescents participated in the study. Multivariate multiple regression was run to test whether the four motives were differently associated with problematic dimensions. Results The results showed that the two motives with negative valence (coping and conformity) were significantly linked to the five dimensions of PFU, whereas the two motives with positive valence (enhancement and social) appeared to be weaker predictors for three out of these five dimensions. Discussion and conclusion In conclusion, psychological motives for using Facebook appeared to significantly contribute to explaining PFU among adolescents, and should be considered by researchers and educational practitioners.

摘要

背景与目的 越来越多的证据表明,问题性 Facebook 使用(PFU)是一个新兴问题,尤其是在青少年中。尽管已经确定了一些解释人们频繁使用 Facebook 的动机,但对于 PFU 背后的特定心理需求知之甚少。本研究旨在测试一个模型,该模型旨在评估使用 Facebook 的心理动机对青少年样本中不同 PFU 维度的独特贡献。 方法 共有 864 名意大利青少年参与了这项研究。进行了多元多重回归分析,以检验这四个动机是否与问题性维度有不同的关联。 结果 结果表明,两个具有负面效价的动机(应对和从众)与 PFU 的五个维度显著相关,而两个具有正面效价的动机(增强和社交)对于这五个维度中的三个维度似乎是较弱的预测因素。 讨论与结论 总之,使用 Facebook 的心理动机似乎可以显著解释青少年中的 PFU,因此研究人员和教育工作者应该考虑这些动机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c812/6174593/53219e36aca0/jba-07-02-32_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c812/6174593/e9a229083ba6/jba-07-02-32_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c812/6174593/53219e36aca0/jba-07-02-32_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c812/6174593/e9a229083ba6/jba-07-02-32_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c812/6174593/53219e36aca0/jba-07-02-32_f002.jpg

相似文献

1
Motives to use Facebook and problematic Facebook use in adolescents.使用 Facebook 的动机和青少年使用 Facebook 存在问题。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):276-283. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.32. Epub 2018 May 30.
2
Modeling the contribution of personality, social identity and social norms to problematic Facebook use in adolescents.模拟人格、社会身份和社会规范对青少年Facebook使用问题的影响。
Addict Behav. 2016 Dec;63:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
3
Attachment and problematic Facebook use in adolescents: The mediating role of metacognitions.青少年的依恋与问题性 Facebook 使用:元认知的中介作用。
J Behav Addict. 2019 Mar 1;8(1):63-78. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.07. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
4
Modeling Problematic Facebook Use: Highlighting the role of mood regulation and preference for online social interaction.建模问题性 Facebook 使用:强调情绪调节和对在线社交互动的偏好的作用。
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Gender and Facebook motives as predictors of specific types of Facebook use: A latent growth curve analysis in adolescence.性别与脸书使用动机作为特定类型脸书使用的预测因素:一项青少年潜在增长曲线分析
J Adolesc. 2016 Oct;52:182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
6
[Drinking motivates, depending on the use of tobacco and cannabis among adolescents].[饮酒对青少年的影响取决于其烟草和大麻的使用情况]
Przegl Lek. 2014;71(11):592-6.
7
Identifying problematic Internet users: development and validation of the Internet Motive Questionnaire for Adolescents (IMQ-A).识别有问题的互联网用户:青少年互联网动机问卷(IMQ-A)的编制与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 9;16(10):e230. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3398.
8
Factorial validity of the Problematic Facebook Use Scale for adolescents and young adults.青少年和青年群体中问题性脸书使用量表的因素效度
J Behav Addict. 2017 Mar 1;6(1):5-10. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.004. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
9
Boredom and problematic Facebook use in adolescents: What is the relationship considering trait or state boredom?青少年的无聊感与Facebook使用问题:考虑特质无聊或状态无聊时,二者关系如何?
Addict Behav. 2022 Feb;125:107132. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107132. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
10
The impact of motives for Facebook use on Facebook addiction among ordinary users in Jordan.动机对约旦普通用户 Facebook 使用成瘾的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;64(6):528-535. doi: 10.1177/0020764018784616. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between self-control and internet gaming disorder and problematic social networking site use: the mediation effects of internet use motives.自我控制与网络游戏障碍及社交网站使用问题之间的关系:网络使用动机的中介作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 26;15:1369973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369973. eCollection 2024.
2
Scrolling for fun or to cope? Associations between social media motives and social media disorder symptoms in adolescents and young adults.是为了娱乐还是为了排解压力而刷社交媒体?青少年和年轻人的社交媒体使用动机与社交媒体紊乱症状之间的关联。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 2;15:1437109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1437109. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale.社交网络成瘾、依恋风格与意大利版卑尔根社交媒体成瘾量表的效度验证
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):178-186. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.023. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
Factorial validity of the Problematic Facebook Use Scale for adolescents and young adults.青少年和青年群体中问题性脸书使用量表的因素效度
J Behav Addict. 2017 Mar 1;6(1):5-10. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.004. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Problematic Social Media Use: Results from a Large-Scale Nationally Representative Adolescent Sample.
Parenting stress, anxiety, and sources of acquiring knowledge in Taiwanese caregivers of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
台湾地区 ADHD 儿童照顾者的育儿压力、焦虑及其知识来源
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):1675. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18761-x.
4
Smartphones, social Media and Adolescent mental well-being: the impact of school policies Restricting dayTime use-protocol for a natural experimental observational study using mixed methods at secondary schools in England (SMART Schools Study).智能手机、社交媒体与青少年心理健康:限制日间使用学校政策的影响——利用英格兰中学的混合方法进行自然实验观察性研究的方案(智能学校研究)
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 5;13(7):e075832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075832.
5
Using Social Media for Social Motives Moderates the Relationship between Post-Traumatic Symptoms during a COVID-19-Related Lockdown and Improvement of Distress after Lockdown.出于社交动机使用社交媒体可调节新冠疫情封锁期间创伤后症状与封锁后痛苦缓解之间的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;13(1):53. doi: 10.3390/bs13010053.
6
Vulnerable Narcissism and Problematic Social Networking Sites Use: Focusing the Lens on Specific Motivations for Social Networking Sites Use.脆弱型自恋与社交网站的问题使用:聚焦于使用社交网站的特定动机
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 8;10(9):1719. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091719.
7
Friendship quality in adolescence: the role of social media features, online social support and e-motions.青少年时期的友谊质量:社交媒体功能、在线社交支持与情绪的作用。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 12:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03564-3.
8
Problematic Social Media Use in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.青少年和年轻人中社交媒体使用问题:系统评价与荟萃分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 14;9(4):e33450. doi: 10.2196/33450.
9
Predicting comments on Facebook photos: Who posts might matter more than what type of photo is posted.预测脸书照片上的评论:发布者可能比所发布照片的类型更重要。
Addict Behav Rep. 2022 Feb 25;15:100417. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100417. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of the Social Network Site Use Motives Scale.社交网站使用动机量表的探索性结构方程模型分析
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Feb;19(2):146-153. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0092. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
社交媒体使用问题:来自全国具有代表性的大规模青少年样本的结果。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169839. eCollection 2017.
4
Modeling the contribution of personality, social identity and social norms to problematic Facebook use in adolescents.模拟人格、社会身份和社会规范对青少年Facebook使用问题的影响。
Addict Behav. 2016 Dec;63:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
5
Dysfunction of Self-Regulation and Self-Control in Facebook Addiction.脸书成瘾中的自我调节与自我控制功能障碍。
Psychiatr Q. 2016 Sep;87(3):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9403-1.
6
Can Facebook informational use foster adolescent civic engagement?脸书的信息使用能促进青少年的公民参与吗?
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Jun;55(3-4):444-54. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9723-1.
7
The mediating effect of gaming motivation between psychiatric symptoms and problematic online gaming: an online survey.精神症状与网络成瘾问题之间游戏动机的中介作用:一项在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 7;17(4):e88. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3515.
8
How do impulsivity traits influence problem gambling through gambling motives? The role of perceived gambling risk/benefits.冲动性特质如何通过赌博动机影响问题赌博?感知到的赌博风险/益处的作用。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;29(3):813-23. doi: 10.1037/adb0000060. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
9
The uses and abuses of Facebook: A review of Facebook addiction.《Facebook 的用途与滥用:对 Facebook 成瘾的综述》。
J Behav Addict. 2014 Sep;3(3):133-48. doi: 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.016. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
10
Identifying problematic Internet users: development and validation of the Internet Motive Questionnaire for Adolescents (IMQ-A).识别有问题的互联网用户:青少年互联网动机问卷(IMQ-A)的编制与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 9;16(10):e230. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3398.