Havey Renee, Aebersold Cassandra, Terrasi Jason
Adult Emergency Services, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2018 Jul/Sep;41(3):302-311. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000216.
Nelson and Baptiste noted that a standard approach to safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) cannot be generalized to all patient care areas because the unique, high-risk tasks of each area require specific intervention. Matching the SPHM program to the setting, tasks, and roles is important in developing a program that will prevent harm. However, there is little evidence related to the use of SPHM programs in nontraditional care environments, such as emergency departments (EDs). A such, there is no standardized method for training ED nurses in safe patient handling. An SPHM challenge unique to the ED is extricating patients out of vehicles. There are several ways to extricate patients from vehicles, with some requiring more resources, people, and equipment than others. These resources vary depending on the patient's level of activity and acuity. The purpose of this article is to articulate the importance of SPHM programs in EDs and the unique challenges and workflows that complicate implementation in this chaotic environment through a review of manual and equipment-assisted methods of extricating patients from the vehicle.
尼尔森和巴普蒂斯特指出,安全患者搬运与移动(SPHM)的标准方法不能推广到所有患者护理区域,因为每个区域独特的高风险任务需要特定干预措施。使SPHM计划与环境、任务和角色相匹配,对于制定预防伤害的计划很重要。然而,几乎没有证据表明SPHM计划在非传统护理环境(如急诊科)中的应用情况。因此,没有针对急诊科护士进行安全患者搬运培训的标准化方法。急诊科特有的SPHM挑战之一是将患者从车辆中解救出来。将患者从车辆中解救出来有几种方法,有些方法比其他方法需要更多资源、人力和设备。这些资源因患者的活动水平和 acuity 而异。本文的目的是通过回顾将患者从车辆中解救出来的手动和设备辅助方法来阐明SPHM计划在急诊科中的重要性,以及在这种混乱环境中使实施复杂化的独特挑战和工作流程。