Institute for Breathing and Sleep and Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
School of Health & Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Jun 15;14(6):941-951. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7156.
To assess whether poor sleep quality experienced by regular shift workers and individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects neurobehavioral function similarly, or whether the different etiologies have distinct patterns of impairment.
Thirty-seven shift workers (> 24 hours after their last shift), 36 untreated patients with OSA, and 39 healthy controls underwent assessment of sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]), mood (Beck Depression Index, State Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI], Profile of Mood States), vigilance (Psychomotor Vigilance Task [PVT], Oxford Sleep Resistance Test [OSLER], driving simulation), neurocognitive function (Logical Memory, Trails Making Task, Digit Span Task, Victoria Stroop Test) and polysomnography.
Sleepiness (ESS score; median, interquartile range) did not differ between the OSA (10.5, 6.3-14) and shift work (7, 5-11.5) groups, but both had significantly elevated scores relative to the control group (5, 3-6). State anxiety (STAI-S) was the only mood variable that differed significantly between the OSA (35, 29-43) and shift work (30, 24-33.5) groups, however both demonstrated several mood deficits relative to the control group. The shift work and control groups performed similarly on neurobehavioral tasks (simulated driving, PVT, OSLER and neurocognitive tests), whereas the OSA group performed worse. On the PVT, lapses were significantly greater for the OSA group (3, 2-6) than both the shift work (2, 0-3.5) and control (1, 0-4) groups.
Shift workers and patients with OSA had similar sleepiness and mood deficits relative to healthy individuals. However, only the patients with OSA showed deficits on vigilance and neurocognitive function relative to healthy individuals. These findings suggest that distinct causes of sleep disturbance likely result in different patterns of neurobehavioral dysfunction.
评估经常倒班的工人和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的睡眠质量差是否会对神经行为功能产生相似的影响,或者不同的病因是否会有不同的损害模式。
37 名倒班工人(上次轮班后超过 24 小时)、36 名未经治疗的 OSA 患者和 39 名健康对照者接受了睡眠质量评估(嗜睡评估量表 [ESS])、情绪(贝克抑郁指数、状态特质焦虑量表 [STAI]、心境状态问卷)、警觉性(精神运动警觉任务 [PVT]、牛津睡眠抵抗测试 [OSLER]、驾驶模拟)、神经认知功能(逻辑记忆、连线测试、数字跨度测试、维多利亚斯特鲁普测试)和多导睡眠图。
OSA(10.5,6.3-14)和轮班工作(7,5-11.5)组的嗜睡(ESS 评分;中位数,四分位间距)没有差异,但均显著高于对照组(5,3-6)。状态焦虑(STAI-S)是唯一显著不同于 OSA(35,29-43)和轮班工作(30,24-33.5)组的情绪变量,然而,两组相对于对照组都表现出几种情绪缺陷。轮班工作和对照组在神经行为任务(模拟驾驶、PVT、OSLER 和神经认知测试)上表现相似,而 OSA 组表现较差。在 PVT 上,OSA 组的失误明显多于轮班工作(3,2-6)和对照组(1,0-4)。
与健康个体相比,倒班工人和 OSA 患者的嗜睡和情绪缺陷相似。然而,只有 OSA 患者在警觉性和神经认知功能方面相对于健康个体存在缺陷。这些发现表明,睡眠障碍的不同原因可能导致不同的神经行为功能障碍模式。