Suppr超能文献

2015年8月,英国上班族中爆发鹦鹉热,这些上班族很少或几乎没有接触过鸟类。

A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015.

作者信息

Mair-Jenkins John, Lamming Tracey, Dziadosz Andy, Flecknoe Daniel, Stubington Thomas, Mentasti Massimo, Muir Peter, Monk Philip

机构信息

Field Epidemiology Training Programme, Public Health England, Nottingham, United Kingdom; European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden; Field Epidemiology Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Public Health England East Midlands, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Curr. 2018 Apr 27;10:ecurrents.outbreaks.b646c3bb2b4f0e3397183f31823bbca6. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.b646c3bb2b4f0e3397183f31823bbca6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

On 14th August 2015 an office manager informed Public Health England of five employees known to have been diagnosed with pneumonia over the previous three weeks. We investigated to establish whether an outbreak occurred and to identify and control the source of infection.

METHODS

We undertook case finding for self-reported pneumonia cases at local businesses (July-August 2015). Clinical samples from a hospitalised case were tested for common respiratory pathogens, but returned negative results. Further testing confirmed infection in this case (serology and PCR).  We subsequently undertook testing for all cases, redefining them as confirmed ( PCR or high antibody titre via serology) or probable (inconclusive serology). Twenty-eight day exposure histories informed descriptive epidemiological analysis. We conducted an environmental investigation at the office to identify potential sources of exposure.

RESULTS

We identified six office workers with pneumonia; four met case definitions (three confirmed, one probable) with symptom onset between 29th July and 4th August 2015. Workplace was the only epidemiological link and only one case reported limited, indirect bird contact. Environmental investigations identified pigeons roosting near the office which were being fed by workers (none cases).

DISCUSSION

This was a probable outbreak of psittacosis with no direct bird-to-human contact reported. Cases recovered after receiving appropriate antibiotics. Feeding of pigeons was stopped. A deep clean of office ventilation systems was conducted and workers were advised to avoid bird contact.  We hypothesised that indirect environmental exposure to infected pigeons was to the source of this outbreak. This work provides evidence that health professionals should consider psittacosis in the differential diagnosis of cases of severe or atypical respiratory illness even without overt bird contact.

摘要

引言

2015年8月14日,一名办公室经理向英国公共卫生部门通报,在过去三周内,已知有五名员工被诊断患有肺炎。我们展开调查,以确定是否发生了疫情,并查明和控制感染源。

方法

我们对当地企业自报的肺炎病例进行了病例排查(2015年7月至8月)。对一名住院病例的临床样本进行了常见呼吸道病原体检测,但结果为阴性。进一步检测确诊了该病例感染(血清学和聚合酶链反应)。随后,我们对所有病例进行了检测,将其重新定义为确诊病例(聚合酶链反应或血清学检测显示高抗体滴度)或可能病例(血清学检测结果不明确)。通过28天暴露史进行描述性流行病学分析。我们在办公室进行了环境调查,以确定潜在的暴露源。

结果

我们确定了六名患有肺炎的办公室工作人员;其中四人符合病例定义(三例确诊,一例可能),症状出现时间为2015年7月29日至8月4日。工作场所是唯一的流行病学关联因素,只有一例报告有有限的、间接的鸟类接触。环境调查发现,办公室附近有鸽子栖息,有工作人员投喂(投喂者均非病例)。

讨论

这可能是一起鹦鹉热疫情,未报告有直接的鸟类与人接触情况。病例在接受适当抗生素治疗后康复。停止了投喂鸽子的行为。对办公室通风系统进行了彻底清洁,并建议工作人员避免接触鸟类。我们推测,间接环境暴露于受感染的鸽子是此次疫情的源头。这项工作提供了证据,表明即使没有明显的鸟类接触,卫生专业人员在对严重或非典型呼吸道疾病病例进行鉴别诊断时也应考虑鹦鹉热。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/5951689/65a2c5ebd5f6/Psitt-timeline.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验