• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于生存结局的倾向评分加权分析:目标值、估计和推断。

On the propensity score weighting analysis with survival outcome: Estimands, estimation, and inference.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2018 Nov 20;37(26):3745-3763. doi: 10.1002/sim.7839. Epub 2018 May 31.

DOI:10.1002/sim.7839
PMID:29855060
Abstract

Propensity score analysis is widely used in observational studies to adjust for confounding and estimate the causal effect of a treatment on the outcome. When the outcome is survival time, there are special considerations on the definition of the causal estimand, point, and variance estimation that have not been thoroughly studied in the literature. We investigate propensity score analysis of survival data with a class of weighting methods. We consider the following estimands in the two-sample context: average survival time, restricted average survival time, survival probability, survival quantile, and the marginal hazard ratio. We propose a unified analytic framework to obtain the point and variance estimators. The proposed methodology properly adjusts for the sampling variability in the estimated propensity scores. Extensive simulations show that the point and variance estimators possess desired finite sample properties and demonstrate better numerical performance than some existing weighting and matching methods commonly used in the literature. The proposed methodology is illustrated with data from a breast cancer study.

摘要

倾向评分分析广泛应用于观察性研究中,以调整混杂因素并估计治疗对结局的因果效应。当结局是生存时间时,在因果估计量、点估计和方差估计的定义方面,文献中尚未进行彻底研究。我们研究了一类加权方法对生存数据的倾向评分分析。在两样本情况下,我们考虑以下估计量:平均生存时间、受限平均生存时间、生存概率、生存分位数和边缘危险比。我们提出了一个统一的分析框架来获得点估计和方差估计。所提出的方法适当地调整了估计倾向得分的抽样变异性。广泛的模拟表明,点估计和方差估计具有理想的有限样本性质,并表现出比文献中常用的一些现有加权和匹配方法更好的数值性能。该方法通过乳腺癌研究的数据进行了说明。

相似文献

1
On the propensity score weighting analysis with survival outcome: Estimands, estimation, and inference.基于生存结局的倾向评分加权分析:目标值、估计和推断。
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 20;37(26):3745-3763. doi: 10.1002/sim.7839. Epub 2018 May 31.
2
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
3
Flexible regression approach to propensity score analysis and its relationship with matching and weighting.灵活回归方法在倾向评分分析中的应用及其与匹配和加权的关系。
Stat Med. 2020 Jul 10;39(15):2017-2034. doi: 10.1002/sim.8526. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
4
Propensity score weighting analysis and treatment effect discovery.倾向评分加权分析与处理效应发现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2439-2454. doi: 10.1177/0962280218781171. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
Propensity score estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated may yield very different estimates.平均治疗效果以及对接受治疗者的平均治疗效果的倾向得分估计量可能会产生非常不同的估计值。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Oct;25(5):1938-1954. doi: 10.1177/0962280213507034. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
6
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?倾向评分分析与部分观测协变量:应如何使用多重插补?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/0962280217713032. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
8
On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.关于倾向得分分析中协变量调整的方差估计
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 10;35(20):3537-48. doi: 10.1002/sim.6943. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Bayesian estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated using inverse weighting.使用逆加权法对接受治疗者的平均治疗效果进行贝叶斯估计。
Stat Med. 2019 Jun 15;38(13):2447-2466. doi: 10.1002/sim.8121. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
10
The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.倾向评分方法在生存或事件发生时间结局中的应用:报告与随机试验中使用的效应测量指标相似的指标。
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 30;33(7):1242-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.5984. Epub 2013 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Sectoral Comparisons of Process Quality Indicators of Health Care Across Residential Regions Using Restricted Mean Survival Time.使用受限平均生存时间对不同居住区域的医疗保健过程质量指标进行跨部门比较。
Med Care. 2024 Nov 1;62(11):748-756. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002057. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
Performance of modeling and balancing approach methods when using weights to estimate treatment effects in observational time-to-event settings.在观察性生存时间设置中使用权重估计治疗效果时,建模和平衡方法的性能。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0289316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289316. eCollection 2023.
3
Multiply robust estimator for the difference in survival functions using pseudo-observations.
使用伪观测值的生存函数差异的多重稳健估计量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02065-6.
4
causalCmprsk: An R package for nonparametric and Cox-based estimation of average treatment effects in competing risks data.因果风险模型:一个用于在竞争风险数据中进行非参数和 Cox 基于估计的平均治疗效果的 R 包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Dec;242:107819. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107819. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
5
Analysis of survival data with nonproportional hazards: A comparison of propensity-score-weighted methods.非比例风险生存数据分析:倾向评分加权法的比较。
Biom J. 2024 Jan;66(1):e202200099. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200099. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
6
Causal inference in medical records and complementary systems pharmacology for metformin drug repurposing towards dementia.基于病历的因果推断和补充系统药理学在二甲双胍药物重用到痴呆症的研究
Nat Commun. 2022 Dec 10;13(1):7652. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35157-w.
7
A Review of Causal Inference for External Comparator Arm Studies.外部对照臂研究的因果推断综述。
Drug Saf. 2022 Aug;45(8):815-837. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01206-y. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
8
Bootstrap vs asymptotic variance estimation when using propensity score weighting with continuous and binary outcomes.当使用倾向评分加权法处理连续和二分类结局时,自举法与渐近方差估计。
Stat Med. 2022 Sep 30;41(22):4426-4443. doi: 10.1002/sim.9519. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
9
Uncovering interpretable potential confounders in electronic medical records.揭示电子病历中可解释的潜在混杂因素。
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 23;13(1):1014. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28546-8.
10
Statistical Issues and Recommendations for Clinical Trials Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Stat Biopharm Res. 2020 Jul 6;12(4):399-411. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1779122.