• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾向评分加权分析与处理效应发现。

Propensity score weighting analysis and treatment effect discovery.

机构信息

1 Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.

2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2439-2454. doi: 10.1177/0962280218781171. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1177/0962280218781171
PMID:29921162
Abstract

Inverse probability weighting can be used to estimate the average treatment effect in propensity score analysis. When there is lack of overlap in the propensity score distributions between the treatment groups under comparison, some weights may be excessively large, causing numerical instability and bias in point and variance estimation. We study a class of modified inverse probability weighting estimators that can be used to avoid this problem. These weights cause the estimand to deviate from the average treatment effect. We provide some justification for this deviation from the perspective of treatment effect discovery. We show that when lack of overlap occurs, the modified weights can achieve substantial gains in statistical power compared with inverse probability weighting and other propensity score methods. We develop analytical variance estimates that properly adjust for the sampling variability of the estimated propensity scores, and augment the modified inverse probability weighting estimator with outcome models for improved efficiency, a property that resembles double robustness. Results from extensive simulations and a real data application support our conclusions. The proposed methodology is implemented in R package PSW.

摘要

逆概率加权(Inverse probability weighting,简称 IPS)可用于倾向评分分析中的平均处理效应估计。当比较组之间的倾向评分分布缺乏重叠时,一些权重可能过大,导致点估计和方差估计的数值不稳定和有偏差。我们研究了一类可用于避免此问题的修正逆概率加权估计量。这些权重会导致估计值偏离平均处理效应。我们从处理效应发现的角度为这种偏差提供了一些理由。我们表明,当缺乏重叠时,与逆概率加权和其他倾向评分方法相比,修正权重可以在统计功效方面取得实质性的提高。我们开发了分析方差估计量,适当地调整了估计倾向评分的抽样变异性,并通过为提高效率的结果模型来增强修正逆概率加权估计量,这一特性类似于双重稳健性。广泛的模拟和实际数据应用的结果支持了我们的结论。所提出的方法学在 R 包 PSW 中实现。

相似文献

1
Propensity score weighting analysis and treatment effect discovery.倾向评分加权分析与处理效应发现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2439-2454. doi: 10.1177/0962280218781171. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
2
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
On variance estimation of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator: A tutorial for different types of propensity score weights.逆处理概率加权估计量的方差估计:不同类型倾向评分权重的教程。
Stat Med. 2024 Jun 15;43(13):2672-2694. doi: 10.1002/sim.10078. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.倾向评分加权在有限重叠和模型误设定下。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3721-3756. doi: 10.1177/0962280220940334. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
6
Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.通过重叠权重解决极端倾向评分对反事实生存函数估计的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 May 20;191(6):1140-1151. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac043.
7
Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?倾向评分分析与部分观测协变量:应如何使用多重插补?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/0962280217713032. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
8
On the propensity score weighting analysis with survival outcome: Estimands, estimation, and inference.基于生存结局的倾向评分加权分析:目标值、估计和推断。
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 20;37(26):3745-3763. doi: 10.1002/sim.7839. Epub 2018 May 31.
9
Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights.通过重叠权重解决极端倾向评分。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 1;188(1):250-257. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy201.
10
On variance estimation of target population created by inverse probability weighting.基于逆概率加权法的目标人群方差估计
J Biopharm Stat. 2024 Aug;34(5):661-679. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2244593. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling Versus Balancing Approaches to Addressing Instrumental Variables in Weighting: A Comparison of the Outcome-Adaptive Lasso, Stable Balancing Weighting, and Stable Confounder Selection.加权中处理工具变量的建模与平衡方法:结果自适应套索法、稳定平衡加权法和稳定混杂因素选择法的比较
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70173. doi: 10.1002/pds.70173.
2
Effectiveness of chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy for stage IVb esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based target trial emulation study.化疗联合或不联合放疗治疗IVb期食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效:一项基于人群的目标试验模拟研究
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 6;16(1):672. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02451-0.
3
Assessing racial disparities in healthcare expenditure using generalized propensity score weighting.
使用广义倾向得分加权法评估医疗保健支出中的种族差异。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02508-2.
4
Social Protection and HIV risk Factors among Youth in Southern Africa: An Analysis of Cross-sectional Population-based HIV Impact Assessment Surveys.南部非洲青年的社会保护与艾滋病毒风险因素:基于人群的艾滋病毒影响评估横断面调查分析
AIDS Behav. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04638-6.
5
Evaluation of two luteal support regimens, intramuscular progesterone and progesterone vaginal gel, for vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in women with chronic salpingitis: a single-center 8-year retrospective study.两种黄体支持方案(肌肉注射黄体酮和阴道用黄体酮凝胶)用于慢性输卵管炎女性冻融胚胎移植的评估:一项单中心8年回顾性研究
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Dec 23;29(1):619. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02231-6.
6
Propensity Score Analysis With Baseline and Follow-Up Measurements of the Outcome Variable.对结果变量进行基线和随访测量的倾向得分分析。
Pharm Stat. 2025 Jan-Feb;24(1):e2436. doi: 10.1002/pst.2436. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
7
Causal meta-analysis by integrating multiple observational studies with multivariate outcomes.基于多变量结局的整合多个观察性研究的因果性荟萃分析。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae070.
8
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for clinical early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based study.立体定向消融放疗与常规分割放疗治疗临床早期非小细胞肺癌:一项基于人群的研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2024 Aug;15(24):1779-1791. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15404. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
9
Efficacy of Definitive Radiotherapy for Patients with Clinical Stage IIIB or IIIC Lung Adenocarcinoma and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations Treated Using First- or Second-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.接受第一代或第二代表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的具有临床 IIIB 期或 IIIC 期肺腺癌和 EGFR 突变的患者的根治性放疗疗效。
Can Respir J. 2024 Mar 5;2024:8889536. doi: 10.1155/2024/8889536. eCollection 2024.
10
Effectiveness of subcutaneous monoclonal antibody treatment in emergency department outpatients with COVID-19.皮下注射单克隆抗体治疗急诊科COVID-19门诊患者的有效性。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Feb 21;5(1):e13116. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13116. eCollection 2024 Feb.